Using comepensation attenuated genetics to understand underlying networks governing cellular robustness

195 723 0
Using comepensation attenuated genetics to understand underlying networks governing cellular robustness

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

Thông tin tài liệu

USING COMPENSATION-ATTENUATED GENETICS TO UNDERSTAND UNDERLYING NETWORKS GOVERNING CELLULAR ROBUSTNESS WANG SIHUI (B.Sc. (Hons)), NUS A THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY NUS GRADUATE SCHOOL FOR INTEGRATIVE SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE 2013 Declaration I hereby declare that the thesis is my original work and it has been written by me in its entirety. I have duly acknowledged all the sources of information which have been used in the thesis. This thesis has also not been submitted for any degree in any university previously. 22/11/13 ------------------------------------- Wang Sihui i Acknowledgements I would like to express my gratitude to my supervisor, Associate Professor Davis Ng T.W., for his guidance and advice throughout the course of this research project. I would also like to thank Dr. Guillaume Thibault for helpful discussion and his willingness to share his knowledge and expertise. Special thanks go to members of the Cell Stress and Homeostasis group, Dr. Rupali Prasad, Dr. Shinichi Kawaguchi, Mr Anthony Tran, Mr Xu Cheng Chao, Ms Liu Ying and Ms Nassira Bedford, for their assistance these years in one way or another. I am grateful for the scholarship awarded by NUS Graduate School for Integrative Sciences and Engineering, without which this journey would not have been possible. I would also like to extend my thanks to the academic and technical staff at Temasek Life Sciences Laboratory for their invaluable help in my research. ii Table of Contents Declaration i Acknowledgements ii Abstract . vi List of Tables vii List of Figures viii List of Abbreviations . xi Chapter 1.Introduction 1.1.The secretory pathway in eukaryotes 1.1.1. Protein folding in the secretory pathway 1.1.2. Protein quality control . 16 1.2. The unfolded protein response 19 1.2.1. Sensing ER stress 21 1.2.2. UPR activation and regulation . 25 1.3. The UPR compensatory mechanism masks the phenotype of a loss in gene function 46 1.4. Using genetic screening as a means to dissect molecular pathways . 48 1.5. Thesis Rationale 51 Chapter 2. Materials and Methods 52 2.1. Yeast Strains, Media, and Cell Culture 52 2.1.1. Yeast strains . 52 2.1.2. Cell culture and media . 56 2.2. General molecular and biochemical techniques 58 2.2.1. Plasmids . 58 2.2.2. Primers used in this study 61 2.2.3. Reagents and Antibodies . 62 2.2.4. Cell Labeling and Immunoprecipitation (Pulse chase analysis) . 62 2.2.5. Growth Assay (Spotting) 63 2.2.6. Assessment of CPY folding using MalPEG conjugation to cysteine sulfhydryl groups 64 2.2.7. Western Analysis 64 2.2.8. Quantitative PCR 65 2.2.9. DNA Microarray . 66 2.3. Synthetic Lethality Screen . 67 2.3.1. UV Mutagenesis . 67 iii 2.3.2. Determining kill rate 67 2.3.3. Screening for temperature-sensitive synthetic lethal mutants . 68 2.3.4. Identifying Recessive Mutants . 69 2.3.5. Cloning and Sequencing Temperature-sensitive Mutants . 69 Chapter 3. Genetic screening for temperature-sensitive mutants displaying synthetic lethality with an ire1 null mutation . 73 3.1. Introduction 73 3.2. Genetic screening . 73 3.2.1. Screening by colony colour phenotype 74 3.2.2. Screening by counter-selection using 5-fluoroorotic acid (5-FOA) . 77 3.2.3. Screening by temperature sensitivity 79 3.3. Cloning by complementation 81 3.4. Secondary screen for biosynthetic and ERAD mutants 82 3.5. Results of genetic screens . 82 3.5.1. Summary of colony colour assay . 83 3.5.2. Summary of 5-FOA screen . 86 3.5.3. Summary of TS screen 88 3.6. Discussion 90 Chapter 4. The UPR buffers against a lethal pdi1 dysfunction 92 4.1. Introduction 92 4.2. Generating the pdi1-2 mutant in the W303 background . 93 4.3. Characterization of the pdi1-2 mutant . 96 4.3.1. pdi1-2Δire1 displays conditional lethality and retains endogenous proteins in the ER . 96 4.3.2. Pdi1pts is stable at the restrictive temperature 99 4.3.3. ER-retention of endogenous proteins is due to misfolding and not a general trafficking defect 100 4.3.4. Effect of pdi1 mutation on ERAD of misfolded substrates 102 4.4. UPR induction via Ire1p/Hac1p is necessary for viability of pdi1-2 106 4.5. Oxidation is not defective in pdi1-2 110 4.6. Other members of the PDI family are dispensable for pdi1-2 survival with UPR induction 113 4.7. High-copy suppressor screen identified NOP56 as a suppressor . 116 4.8. Microarray analysis 120 4.9. Verification of microarray data by quantitative PCR 126 iv 4.10. Expression of KAR2 suppresses defects in pdi1-2Δire1 128 4.11. Co-expression of KAR2 interacting factors has no additive effect over KAR2 expression alone 131 4.12. The Hsp70-like Lhs1p alone does not compensate for defects in pdi1-2Δire1 135 4.13. KAR2 and pdi1ts work synergistically in pdi1-2Δire1 . 138 4.14. Characterizing the functional interaction between KAR2 and pdi1ts 141 4.15. Discussion . 144 Chapter 5. Characterization of other mutants from the screen 152 5.1. Secondary screen for protein biogenesis defect 152 5.2. Secondary screen for ERAD defect . 159 5.3. tssl36 is a tip20 mutant . 163 5.4. tssl30 causes enhanced ERAD of CPY* 167 5.5. Discussion 169 Chapter 6. Conclusion and future direction . 171 7. References . 173 v Abstract The unfolded protein response (UPR) is a homeostatic mechanism in cells which is activated in response to accumulation of unfolded/misfolded proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). The Ire1/Hac1 signaling pathway relays the UPR signal and activates a transcriptional programme which helps restore equilibrium in the ER by alleviating ER stress. Using compensation-attenuated genetics, a novel allele of protein disulfide isomerase (PDI), pdi1-2, was isolated. Pdi1p is an essential protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae involved in the catalytic oxidation, reduction and isomerization of disulfide bonds in secretory and membrane proteins. pdi1-2 is inviable in the absence of the UPR, but UPR activation suppressed lethality and compensated for defects in the biogenesis of endogenous proteins, CPY and Gas1p. Microarray analysis suggested that the UPR is modulated over time and shows plasticity in its output in response to different types of stress. Surprisingly, PDI family members that are UPR target genes were dispensable for suppression of lethality in pdi1-2, suggesting they are not functionally interchangeable. pdi1-2 is oxidationcompetent, suggesting that the CPY folding defect may be due to a defect in its chaperone function. Upregulation of the Hsp70 chaperone Kar2p and its Hsp40 cofactors by the UPR helped buffer the lethal pdi1 dysfunction. Interestingly, coexpression of KAR2 and pdi1ts synergistically restored cell viability and CPY maturation to a level comparable to the UPR. It is likely that KAR2 specifically compensates for the chaperone defect in pdi1-2 during protein folding. This suggests that different chaperone networks in the ER can buffer one another during ER stress, and may work in synergy to contribute to cellular robustness. vi List of Tables Table 1. List of UPR target genes and their functional categories 28 Table 2. List of genes synthetic lethal with Δire1/Δhac1 based on SGA analysis 47 Table 3. Yeast strains used in this study 52 Table 4. Components of yeast culture media 57 Table 5. Plasmids used in this study 58 Table 6. List of primers used in this study . 61 Table 7. List of high-copy suppressor plasmids isolated and the genes encoded . 116 Table 8. List of genes encoded by the complementing plasmid . 165 vii List of Figures Figure 1. Overview of protein folding in the ER and the chaperones involved . Figure 2. Co-translational and post-translational translocation Figure 3. Domain organization of Hsp70 . Figure 4. Domain organization of Hsp40 . Figure 5. Substrate-binding cycle of Kar2p 11 Figure 6. Domain organization of PDI family members . 15 Figure 7. The Hrd1 and Doa10 complexes involved in ERAD . 18 Figure 8. The UPR signaling pathway in S.cerevisiae . 29 Figure 9. The three branches of the UPR in higher eukaryotes . 35 Figure 10. Diagrammatic representation of the ER stress response in higher eukaryotes . 41 Figure 11. Schematic representation of the BCL2 family of proteins under resting conditions and during ER stress . 44 Figure 12. Steps in the secretory pathway defined by temperature-sensitive yeast sec mutants deficient in protein secretion 49 Figure 13. Diagrammatic representation of the yeast adenine biosynthesis pathway 74 Figure 14. Primary genetic screen using colony colour phenotype 76 Figure 15. Primary genetic screen by counter-selection using 5-FOA . 78 Figure 16. Primary genetic screen by temperature sensitivity 80 Figure 17. Workflow of genetic screen using colony colour and the number of mutants obtained at each step 84 Figure 18. Workflow of genetic screen using 5-FOA and the number of mutants obtained at each step 87 Figure 19. Workflow of genetic screen using temperature sensitivity and the number of mutants obtained at each step 89 Figure 20. pdi1-2 contains a L476S point mutation in the a' domain of PDI1 . 92 Figure 21. Integrating the ts allele into the W303 genome 95 Figure 22. pdi1-2 is inviable at the restrictive temperature in the absence of the UPR 96 viii Figure 23. The ER forms of CPY and Gas1p accumulate in pdi1-2Δire1 at the restrictive temperature 98 Figure 24. Pdi1pts is stable at the restrictive temperature 99 Figure 25. The retention of CPY and Gas1p in the ER is not due to a general ER-golgi transport defect . 100 Figure 26. CPY is misfolded in pdi1-2 Δire1 at the restrictive temperature 102 Figure 27. CPY* is stabilized in the pdi1 mutant and the UPR does not fully compensate for this defect 103 Figure 28. ERAD of PrA* is affected in pdi1-2Δire1 . 104 Figure 29. ERAD of a non-glycosylated substrate is similarly affected in pdi1-2Δire1 105 Figure 30. The UPR is induced in pdi1-2 at the restrictive temperature . 106 Figure 31. Viability is mediated by Ire1p/Hac1p signaling branch 107 Figure 32. UPR activation fixes the defect in CPY maturation . 108 Figure 33. Deletion of the lumenal domain of IRE1 abolished suppression of lethality 109 Figure 34. Oxidation is not defective in pdi1-2Δire1 . 111 Figure 35. Addition of diamide did not improve oxidative protein folding . 112 Figure 36. Deletion of PDI family members has no effect on viability when the UPR is activated. . 114 Figure 37. The UPR sufficiently compensates for the defect in CPY processing in the absence of PDI family members. . 115 Figure 38. Isolates from high-copy suppressor screen 118 Figure 39. High-copy plasmids HC5 and HC7 partially suppressed cell lethality . 119 Figure 40. UPR target genes are differentially induced in pdi1-2, compared to WT 123 Figure 41. Microarray analysis identified UPR genes differentially upregulated in pdi1-2 at various time points after shifting to the restrictive temperature 125 Figure 42. Correlation between qPCR data with microarray data 127 Figure 43. Expression of KAR2 suppresses lethality 129 Figure 44. KAR2 improved CPY maturation in vivo 130 ix Figure 58. UPR activation inhibits enhanced degradation of CPY* WT, Δire1, tssl30Δire1, and tssl30 were pre-incubated at 37°C for 15 min, pulse labeled for 10 with [35S] methionine/cysteine, and chased for 60 min. Immunoprecipitation of CPY* was performed using anti-HA monoclonal antibody and normalized by total TCA precipitable counts. Proteins were separated by SDSPAGE, visualized by autoradiography, and quantified by phosphorimager analysis. Results are depicted in the graph above. Preliminary analysis suggested that the enhanced degradation is corrected by the UPR. When IRE1 was expressed, CPY* degradation proceeded at WT rate (Fig. 58). Since the mutant is synthetic lethal with Δire1, it suggests that the mutation causing enhanced degradation is detrimental to the cell. This could be because of indiscriminate degradation of all proteins, not just misfolded ones, resulting in the disruption of protein homeostasis. It would be interesting to identify the mutated gene and study its role in regulation of protein degradation, but unfortunately I was unable to clone this gene due to the extremely low transformation efficiency of this mutant. 168 5.5. Discussion Secondary screening for desired phenotypes is necessary for identifying mutants of interest. In this study, I screened the tssl mutants for defects in bioprocessing of CPY and Gas1p, as well as ERAD of CPY*. I identified two mutants that showed defects in protein folding/trafficking. The first mutant, tssl3, was later identified as pdi1-2 and described in detail in Chapter 4; the second mutant, tssl36, is a tip20 mutant and also has defects in ERAD. In addition, three other ERAD mutants were identified, two of which stabilized CPY*. Of interest is tssl30, which showed enhanced degradation of CPY*. It is unclear why the tip20 mutant (tssl36) has defects in both protein folding/trafficking, and ERAD, since it is known to be involved in retrograde transport. Perhaps it has an undiscovered function in anterograde transport, or the defects could be indirect effects arising from the disruption to normal recycling of factors that are involved in these processes. Initial characterization of tssl30 surprisingly showed enhanced degradation of the model ERAD substrate, CPY*. This could be due to the loss of quality control mechanisms governing degradation of misfolded proteins, or just proteins in general. Such a defect could cause a loss of protein homeostasis in the cell, which could lead to cell death. The role of the UPR in ensuring survival of these mutants needs to be further characterized, which would provide greater insights into the functions of these genes in protein trafficking and protein degradation. Unexpectedly, the number of colonies that needed to be screened to identify mutants of interest was much greater than initially thought. This is due to the high 169 proportion of false positives as well as the rarity of temperature-sensitive synthetic lethal mutants. As such, a more extensive screen is required if a broader range of mutants is to be identified. 170 Chapter 6. Conclusion and future direction The UPR provides an important buffer against dysregulation of protein homeostasis in the secretory pathway. In S.cerevisiae, the UPR is non-essential during non-stress conditions, but studies identifying the broad range of genes displaying synthetic lethality with the UPR underscore the importance of this stress response when cells undergo internal and external perturbations. In chapter and chapter of this thesis, I described the genetic system that was set up to allow us to study loss of gene functions in the absence of compensatory mechanisms of the UPR, as well as to examine how the UPR buffers against such physiologic stress. Chapter focuses on one of the mutants identified from the screen, pdi1-2, which exhibited a mild ERAD defect with the UPR on but was completely inviable in its absence. Analysis of this mutant suggested that even though there is only one UPR transducer in the budding yeast, the UPR displays plasticity and modifies its output according to the needs of the cell. As far as we know, Hac1p is the sole transcription factor activating the UPR target genes. How the cell regulates transcription of a specific subset of UPR genes when Hac1p is expressed remains an open question. One way we can study this is to examine the gene promoters that are bound by Hac1p over time using chromatin immunoprecipitation coupled to high throughput sequencing (ChIP-SEQ). This will give us an idea whether Hac1p remains bound to all UPR target gene promoters over time, or whether its binding varies with time. Constant binding would signal the action of other repressors and additional signaling mechanisms that modifies the UPR output. 171 Interestingly, analysis of pdi1-2 revealed the cooperation between Kar2p and Pdi1p in protein folding. It is not known if this synergistic action occurs under normal condition, or is simply the result of buffering between different chaperone networks carrying out the same function of protein folding. Further association studies need to be carried out to understand the mechanism through which Kar2p fixes the folding defect in pdi1-2. It would also be interesting to study if this relationship is reciprocal and whether PDI family members can buffer against defects in the HSP chaperone network. 172 7. References Araki, K., Nagata, K., 2011. Protein folding and quality control in the er. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol (11), a007526. Araki, K., Nagata, K., 2012. Protein folding and quality control in the er. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol (8), a015438. Baxter, B.K., James, P., Evans, T., Craig, E.A., 1996. Ssi1 encodes a novel hsp70 of the saccharomyces cerevisiae endoplasmic reticulum. Mol Cell Biol 16 (11), 6444-56. Beh, C.T., Rose, M.D., 1995. Two redundant systems maintain levels of resident proteins within the yeast endoplasmic reticulum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92 (21), 9820-3. Bertolotti, A., Zhang, Y., Hendershot, L.M., Harding, H.P., Ron, D., 2000. Dynamic interaction of bip and er stress transducers in the unfolded-protein response. Nat Cell Biol (6), 326-32. Brizzio, V., Khalfan, W., Huddler, D., Beh, C.T., Andersen, S.S., Latterich, M., Rose, M.D., 1999. Genetic interactions between kar7/sec71, kar8/jem1, kar5, and kar2 during nuclear fusion in saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 10 (3), 609-26. Brodsky, J.L., Goeckeler, J., Schekman, R., 1995. Bip and sec63p are required for both co- and posttranslational protein translocation into the yeast endoplasmic reticulum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92 (21), 9643-6. Brodsky, J.L., Skach, W.R., 2011. Protein folding and quality control in the endoplasmic reticulum: Recent lessons from yeast and mammalian cell systems. Curr Opin Cell Biol 23 (4), 464-75. Buck, T.M., Kolb, A.R., Boyd, C.R., Kleyman, T.R., Brodsky, J.L., 2010. The endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation of the epithelial sodium channel requires a unique complement of molecular chaperones. Mol Biol Cell 21 (6), 1047-58. Byrd, A.E., Aragon, I.V., Brewer, J.W., 2012. Microrna-30c-2* limits expression of proadaptive factor xbp1 in the unfolded protein response. J Cell Biol 196 (6), 689-98. Cai, H., Wang, C.C., Tsou, C.L., 1994. Chaperone-like activity of protein disulfide isomerase in the refolding of a protein with no disulfide bonds. J Biol Chem 269 (40), 24550-2. Carrara, M., Prischi, F., Ali, M.M., 2013. Upr signal activation by luminal sensor domains. Int J Mol Sci 14 (3), 6454-66. Chakrabarti, A., Chen, A.W., Varner, J.D., 2011. A review of the mammalian unfolded protein response. Biotechnol Bioeng 108 (12), 2777-93. Chang, S.C., Wooden, S.K., Nakaki, T., Kim, Y.K., Lin, A.Y., Kung, L., Attenello, J.W., Lee, A.S., 1987. Rat gene encoding the 78-kda glucose-regulated protein grp78: Its regulatory sequences and the effect of protein glycosylation on its expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 84 (3), 680-4. Chawla, A., Chakrabarti, S., Ghosh, G., Niwa, M., 2011. Attenuation of yeast upr is essential for survival and is mediated by ire1 kinase. J Cell Biol 193 (1), 41-50. Chen, X., Shen, J., Prywes, R., 2002. The luminal domain of atf6 senses endoplasmic reticulum (er) stress and causes translocation of atf6 from the er to the golgi. J Biol Chem 277 (15), 13045-52. Corsi, A.K., Schekman, R., 1997. The lumenal domain of sec63p stimulates the atpase activity of bip and mediates bip recruitment to the translocon in saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol 137 (7), 1483-93. Costanzo, M., Baryshnikova, A., Bellay, J., Kim, Y., Spear, E.D., Sevier, C.S., Ding, H., Koh, J.L., Toufighi, K., Mostafavi, S., Prinz, J., St Onge, R.P., Vandersluis, B., Makhnevych, T., Vizeacoumar, F.J., Alizadeh, S., Bahr, S., Brost, R.L., Chen, Y., Cokol, M., Deshpande, R., Li, Z., Lin, Z.Y., Liang, W., Marback, M., Paw, J., San Luis, B.J., Shuteriqi, E., Tong, A.H., Van Dyk, N., Wallace, I.M., Whitney, J.A., Weirauch, M.T., Zhong, G., Zhu, H., Houry, W.A., Brudno, M., Ragibizadeh, S., Papp, B., Pal, C., Roth, F.P., Giaever, G., Nislow, C., Troyanskaya, O.G., Bussey, H., Bader, G.D., Gingras, A.C., Morris, Q.D., 173 Kim, P.M., Kaiser, C.A., Myers, C.L., Andrews, B.J., Boone, C., 2010. The genetic landscape of a cell. Science 327 (5964), 425-31. Cox, J.S., Shamu, C.E., Walter, P., 1993. Transcriptional induction of genes encoding endoplasmic reticulum resident proteins requires a transmembrane protein kinase. Cell 73 (6), 1197-206. Cox, J.S., Walter, P., 1996. A novel mechanism for regulating activity of a transcription factor that controls the unfolded protein response. Cell 87 (3), 391-404. Craven, R.A., Egerton, M., Stirling, C.J., 1996. A novel hsp70 of the yeast er lumen is required for the efficient translocation of a number of protein precursors. EMBO J 15 (11), 2640-50. Credle, J.J., Finer-Moore, J.S., Papa, F.R., Stroud, R.M., Walter, P., 2005. On the mechanism of sensing unfolded protein in the endoplasmic reticulum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102 (52), 18773-84. Cui, W., Li, J., Ron, D., Sha, B., 2011. The structure of the perk kinase domain suggests the mechanism for its activation. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 67 (Pt 5), 423-8. De Hoon, M.J., Imoto, S., Nolan, J., Miyano, S., 2004. Open source clustering software. Bioinformatics 20 (9), 1453-4. De Maio, A., 1999. Heat shock proteins: Facts, thoughts, and dreams. Shock 11 (1), 1-12. Deshaies, R.J., Schekman, R., 1987. A yeast mutant defective at an early stage in import of secretory protein precursors into the endoplasmic reticulum. J Cell Biol 105 (2), 63345. Ding, W.X., Yin, X.M., 2008. Sorting, recognition and activation of the misfolded protein degradation pathways through macroautophagy and the proteasome. Autophagy (2), 141-50. Doering, T.L., Schekman, R., 1996. Gpi anchor attachment is required for gas1p transport from the endoplasmic reticulum in cop ii vesicles. EMBO J 15 (1), 182-91. Ellgaard, L., Helenius, A., 2003. Quality control in the endoplasmic reticulum. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol (3), 181-91. Ellgaard, L., Molinari, M., Helenius, A., 1999. Setting the standards: Quality control in the secretory pathway. Science 286 (5446), 1882-8. Farhan, H., Rabouille, C., 2011. Signalling to and from the secretory pathway. J Cell Sci 124 (Pt 2), 171-80. Farquhar, R., Honey, N., Murant, S.J., Bossier, P., Schultz, L., Montgomery, D., Ellis, R.W., Freedman, R.B., Tuite, M.F., 1991. Protein disulfide isomerase is essential for viability in saccharomyces cerevisiae. Gene 108 (1), 81-9. Fawcett, T.W., Martindale, J.L., Guyton, K.Z., Hai, T., Holbrook, N.J., 1999. Complexes containing activating transcription factor (atf)/camp-responsive-element-binding protein (creb) interact with the ccaat/enhancer-binding protein (c/ebp)-atf composite site to regulate gadd153 expression during the stress response. Biochem J 339 ( Pt 1), 135-41. Feldheim, D., Rothblatt, J., Schekman, R., 1992. Topology and functional domains of sec63p, an endoplasmic reticulum membrane protein required for secretory protein translocation. Mol Cell Biol 12 (7), 3288-96. Ferro-Novick, S., Novick, P., Field, C., Schekman, R., 1984. Yeast secretory mutants that block the formation of active cell surface enzymes. J Cell Biol 98 (1), 35-43. Finger, A., Knop, M., Wolf, D.H., 1993. Analysis of two mutated vacuolar proteins reveals a degradation pathway in the endoplasmic reticulum or a related compartment of yeast. Eur J Biochem 218 (2), 565-74. Fonseca, S.G., Ishigaki, S., Oslowski, C.M., Lu, S., Lipson, K.L., Ghosh, R., Hayashi, E., Ishihara, H., Oka, Y., Permutt, M.A., Urano, F., 2010. Wolfram syndrome gene negatively regulates er stress signaling in rodent and human cells. J Clin Invest 120 (3), 744-55. 174 Forsburg, S.L., 2001. The art and design of genetic screens: Yeast. Nat Rev Genet (9), 65968. Frand, A.R., Kaiser, C.A., 1998. The ero1 gene of yeast is required for oxidation of protein dithiols in the endoplasmic reticulum. Mol Cell (2), 161-70. Gaddam, D., Stevens, N., Hollien, J., 2013. Comparison of mrna localization and regulation during endoplasmic reticulum stress in drosophila cells. Mol Biol Cell 24 (1), 14-20. Gardner, B.M., Walter, P., 2011. Unfolded proteins are ire1-activating ligands that directly induce the unfolded protein response. Science 333 (6051), 1891-4. Gauss, R., Kanehara, K., Carvalho, P., Ng, D.T., Aebi, M., 2011. A complex of pdi1p and the mannosidase htm1p initiates clearance of unfolded glycoproteins from the endoplasmic reticulum. Mol Cell 42 (6), 782-93. Gautier, T., Berges, T., Tollervey, D., Hurt, E., 1997. Nucleolar kke/d repeat proteins nop56p and nop58p interact with nop1p and are required for ribosome biogenesis. Mol Cell Biol 17 (12), 7088-98. Ghaemmaghami, S., Huh, W.K., Bower, K., Howson, R.W., Belle, A., Dephoure, N., O'shea, E.K., Weissman, J.S., 2003. Global analysis of protein expression in yeast. Nature 425 (6959), 737-41. Gillece, P., Luz, J.M., Lennarz, W.J., De La Cruz, F.J., Romisch, K., 1999. Export of a cysteinefree misfolded secretory protein from the endoplasmic reticulum for degradation requires interaction with protein disulfide isomerase. J Cell Biol 147 (7), 1443-56. Girrbach, V., Strahl, S., 2003. Members of the evolutionarily conserved pmt family of protein o-mannosyltransferases form distinct protein complexes among themselves. J Biol Chem 278 (14), 12554-62. Grubb, S., Guo, L., Fisher, E.A., Brodsky, J.L., 2012. Protein disulfide isomerases contribute differentially to the endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation of apolipoprotein b and other substrates. Mol Biol Cell 23 (4), 520-32. Guo, J., Polymenis, M., 2006. Dcr2 targets ire1 and downregulates the unfolded protein response in saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO Rep (11), 1124-7. Gupta, S., Deepti, A., Deegan, S., Lisbona, F., Hetz, C., Samali, A., 2010. Hsp72 protects cells from er stress-induced apoptosis via enhancement of ire1alpha-xbp1 signaling through a physical interaction. PLoS Biol (7), e1000410. Guthrie, C., Fink, G.R. , 1991. Methods in enzymology: Guide to yeast genetics and molecular biology. pp. 933. Hamilton, T.G., Flynn, G.C., 1996. Cer1p, a novel hsp70-related protein required for posttranslational endoplasmic reticulum translocation in yeast. J Biol Chem 271 (48), 30610-3. Harding, H.P., Novoa, I., Zhang, Y., Zeng, H., Wek, R., Schapira, M., Ron, D., 2000. Regulated translation initiation controls stress-induced gene expression in mammalian cells. Mol Cell (5), 1099-108. Harding, H.P., Zhang, Y., Ron, D., 1999. Protein translation and folding are coupled by an endoplasmic-reticulum-resident kinase. Nature 397 (6716), 271-4. Harding, H.P., Zhang, Y., Zeng, H., Novoa, I., Lu, P.D., Calfon, M., Sadri, N., Yun, C., Popko, B., Paules, R., Stojdl, D.F., Bell, J.C., Hettmann, T., Leiden, J.M., Ron, D., 2003. An integrated stress response regulates amino acid metabolism and resistance to oxidative stress. Mol Cell 11 (3), 619-33. Hasilik, A., Tanner, W., 1978. Biosynthesis of the vacuolar yeast glycoprotein carboxypeptidase y. Conversion of precursor into the enzyme. Eur J Biochem 85 (2), 599-608. Hayano, T., Yanagida, M., Yamauchi, Y., Shinkawa, T., Isobe, T., Takahashi, N., 2003. Proteomic analysis of human nop56p-associated pre-ribosomal ribonucleoprotein 175 complexes. Possible link between nop56p and the nucleolar protein treacle responsible for treacher collins syndrome. J Biol Chem 278 (36), 34309-19. Haze, K., Yoshida, H., Yanagi, H., Yura, T., Mori, K., 1999. Mammalian transcription factor atf6 is synthesized as a transmembrane protein and activated by proteolysis in response to endoplasmic reticulum stress. Mol Biol Cell 10 (11), 3787-99. Hetz, C., 2012. The unfolded protein response: Controlling cell fate decisions under er stress and beyond. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 13 (2), 89-102. Hetz, C., Bernasconi, P., Fisher, J., Lee, A.H., Bassik, M.C., Antonsson, B., Brandt, G.S., Iwakoshi, N.N., Schinzel, A., Glimcher, L.H., Korsmeyer, S.J., 2006. Proapoptotic bax and bak modulate the unfolded protein response by a direct interaction with ire1alpha. Science 312 (5773), 572-6. Hightower, L.E., 1980. Cultured animal cells exposed to amino acid analogues or puromycin rapidly synthesize several polypeptides. J Cell Physiol 102 (3), 407-27. Holkeri, H., Paunola, E., Jamsa, E., Makarow, M., 1998. Dissection of the translocation and chaperoning functions of yeast bip/kar2p in vivo. J Cell Sci 111 ( Pt 6), 749-57. Hollien, J., Lin, J.H., Li, H., Stevens, N., Walter, P., Weissman, J.S., 2009. Regulated ire1dependent decay of messenger rnas in mammalian cells. J Cell Biol 186 (3), 323-31. Hollien, J., Weissman, J.S., 2006. Decay of endoplasmic reticulum-localized mrnas during the unfolded protein response. Science 313 (5783), 104-7. Hosaka, K., Nikawa, J., Kodaki, T., Ishizu, H., Yamashita, S., 1994. Cloning and sequence of the scs3 gene which is required for inositol prototrophy in saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biochem 116 (6), 1317-21. Huang, T., Barclay, B.J., Kalman, T.I., Von Borstel, R.C., Hastings, P.J., 1992. The phenotype of a dihydrofolate reductase mutant of saccharomyces cerevisiae. Gene 121 (1), 167-71. Johnson, N., Powis, K., High, S., 2012. Post-translational translocation into the endoplasmic reticulum. Biochim Biophys Acta. Joseph Sambrook, D.W.R., 2001. Molecular cloning : A laboratory manual, 3rd ed. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. : Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, c2001. Kabani, M., Beckerich, J.M., Gaillardin, C., 2000. Sls1p stimulates sec63p-mediated activation of kar2p in a conformation-dependent manner in the yeast endoplasmic reticulum. Mol Cell Biol 20 (18), 6923-34. Kabani, M., Kelley, S.S., Morrow, M.W., Montgomery, D.L., Sivendran, R., Rose, M.D., Gierasch, L.M., Brodsky, J.L., 2003. Dependence of endoplasmic reticulumassociated degradation on the peptide binding domain and concentration of bip. Mol Biol Cell 14 (8), 3437-48. Kabani, M., Mclellan, C., Raynes, D.A., Guerriero, V., Brodsky, J.L., 2002. Hspbp1, a homologue of the yeast fes1 and sls1 proteins, is an hsc70 nucleotide exchange factor. FEBS Lett 531 (2), 339-42. Kaiser, C.A., Schekman, R., 1990. Distinct sets of sec genes govern transport vesicle formation and fusion early in the secretory pathway. Cell 61 (4), 723-33. Kamena, F., Spang, A., 2004. Tip20p prohibits back-fusion of copii vesicles with the endoplasmic reticulum. Science 304 (5668), 286-9. Kampinga, H.H., Craig, E.A., 2010. The hsp70 chaperone machinery: J proteins as drivers of functional specificity. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11 (8), 579-92. Katiyar, S., Till, E.A., Lennarz, W.J., 2001. Studies on the function of yeast protein disulfide isomerase in renaturation of proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta 1548 (1), 47-56. Kawahara, T., Yanagi, H., Yura, T., Mori, K., 1997. Endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced mrna splicing permits synthesis of transcription factor hac1p/ern4p that activates the unfolded protein response. Mol Biol Cell (10), 1845-62. Kim, S., Sideris, D.P., Sevier, C.S., Kaiser, C.A., 2012. Balanced ero1 activation and inactivation establishes er redox homeostasis. J Cell Biol 196 (6), 713-25. 176 Kimata, Y., Kimata, Y.I., Shimizu, Y., Abe, H., Farcasanu, I.C., Takeuchi, M., Rose, M.D., Kohno, K., 2003. Genetic evidence for a role of bip/kar2 that regulates ire1 in response to accumulation of unfolded proteins. Mol Biol Cell 14 (6), 2559-69. Kimata, Y., Oikawa, D., Shimizu, Y., Ishiwata-Kimata, Y., Kohno, K., 2004. A role for bip as an adjustor for the endoplasmic reticulum stress-sensing protein ire1. J Cell Biol 167 (3), 445-56. Kimmig, P., Diaz, M., Zheng, J., Williams, C.C., Lang, A., Aragon, T., Li, H., Walter, P., 2012. The unfolded protein response in fission yeast modulates stability of select mrnas to maintain protein homeostasis. Elife 1, e00048. Kimura, T., Hosoda, Y., Sato, Y., Kitamura, Y., Ikeda, T., Horibe, T., Kikuchi, M., 2005. Interactions among yeast protein-disulfide isomerase proteins and endoplasmic reticulum chaperone proteins influence their activities. J Biol Chem 280 (36), 3143841. Kitano, H., 2004. Biological robustness. Nat Rev Genet (11), 826-37. Knop, M., Finger, A., Braun, T., Hellmuth, K., Wolf, D.H., 1996. Der1, a novel protein specifically required for endoplasmic reticulum degradation in yeast. EMBO J 15 (4), 753-63. Kojima, E., Takeuchi, A., Haneda, M., Yagi, A., Hasegawa, T., Yamaki, K., Takeda, K., Akira, S., Shimokata, K., Isobe, K., 2003. The function of gadd34 is a recovery from a shutoff of protein synthesis induced by er stress: Elucidation by gadd34-deficient mice. FASEB J 17 (11), 1573-5. Komar, A.A., Hatzoglou, M., 2011. Cellular ires-mediated translation: The war of itafs in pathophysiological states. Cell Cycle 10 (2), 229-40. Korennykh, A., Walter, P., 2012. Structural basis of the unfolded protein response. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 28, 251-77. Korennykh, A.V., Egea, P.F., Korostelev, A.A., Finer-Moore, J., Zhang, C., Shokat, K.M., Stroud, R.M., Walter, P., 2009. The unfolded protein response signals through high-order assembly of ire1. Nature 457 (7230), 687-93. Kosuri, P., Alegre-Cebollada, J., Feng, J., Kaplan, A., Ingles-Prieto, A., Badilla, C.L., Stockwell, B.R., Sanchez-Ruiz, J.M., Holmgren, A., Fernandez, J.M., 2012. Protein folding drives disulfide formation. Cell 151 (4), 794-806. Kozutsumi, Y., Segal, M., Normington, K., Gething, M.J., Sambrook, J., 1988. The presence of malfolded proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum signals the induction of glucoseregulated proteins. Nature 332 (6163), 462-4. Lafontaine, D.L., Tollervey, D., 2000. Synthesis and assembly of the box c+d small nucleolar rnps. Mol Cell Biol 20 (8), 2650-9. Lee, A.H., Iwakoshi, N.N., Glimcher, L.H., 2003. Xbp-1 regulates a subset of endoplasmic reticulum resident chaperone genes in the unfolded protein response. Mol Cell Biol 23 (21), 7448-59. Lee, K.P., Dey, M., Neculai, D., Cao, C., Dever, T.E., Sicheri, F., 2008. Structure of the dual enzyme ire1 reveals the basis for catalysis and regulation in nonconventional rna splicing. Cell 132 (1), 89-100. Leidich, S.D., Drapp, D.A., Orlean, P., 1994. A conditionally lethal yeast mutant blocked at the first step in glycosyl phosphatidylinositol anchor synthesis. J Biol Chem 269 (14), 10193-6. Leidich, S.D., Kostova, Z., Latek, R.R., Costello, L.C., Drapp, D.A., Gray, W., Fassler, J.S., Orlean, P., 1995. Temperature-sensitive yeast gpi anchoring mutants gpi2 and gpi3 are defective in the synthesis of n-acetylglucosaminyl phosphatidylinositol. Cloning of the gpi2 gene. J Biol Chem 270 (22), 13029-35. Lewis, M.J., Rayner, J.C., Pelham, H.R., 1997. A novel snare complex implicated in vesicle fusion with the endoplasmic reticulum. EMBO J 16 (11), 3017-24. 177 Li, H., Korennykh, A.V., Behrman, S.L., Walter, P., 2010. Mammalian endoplasmic reticulum stress sensor ire1 signals by dynamic clustering. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107 (37), 16113-8. Liu, C.Y., Schroder, M., Kaufman, R.J., 2000. Ligand-independent dimerization activates the stress response kinases ire1 and perk in the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum. J Biol Chem 275 (32), 24881-5. Lodish H, B.A., Zipursky Sl, Et Al., 2000. Molecular cell biology section 17.3, overview of the secretory pathway. 4th edition ed. W. H. Freeman, New York. Luo, D., He, Y., Zhang, H., Yu, L., Chen, H., Xu, Z., Tang, S., Urano, F., Min, W., 2008. Aip1 is critical in transducing ire1-mediated endoplasmic reticulum stress response. J Biol Chem 283 (18), 11905-12. Lyman, S.K., Schekman, R., 1995. Interaction between bip and sec63p is required for the completion of protein translocation into the er of saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol 131 (5), 1163-71. Ma, Y., Hendershot, L.M., 2003. Delineation of a negative feedback regulatory loop that controls protein translation during endoplasmic reticulum stress. J Biol Chem 278 (37), 34864-73. Makmura, L., Hamann, M., Areopagita, A., Furuta, S., Munoz, A., Momand, J., 2001. Development of a sensitive assay to detect reversibly oxidized protein cysteine sulfhydryl groups. Antioxid Redox Signal (6), 1105-18. Matlack, K.E., Misselwitz, B., Plath, K., Rapoport, T.A., 1999. Bip acts as a molecular ratchet during posttranslational transport of prepro-alpha factor across the er membrane. Cell 97 (5), 553-64. Mayer, M., Kies, U., Kammermeier, R., Buchner, J., 2000. Bip and pdi cooperate in the oxidative folding of antibodies in vitro. J Biol Chem 275 (38), 29421-5. Merksamer, P.I., Papa, F.R., 2010. The upr and cell fate at a glance. J Cell Sci 123 (Pt 7), 10036. Meusser, B., Hirsch, C., Jarosch, E., Sommer, T., 2005. Erad: The long road to destruction. Nat Cell Biol (8), 766-72. Moir, R.D., Gross, D.A., Silver, D.L., Willis, I.M., 2012. Scs3 and yft2 link transcription of phospholipid biosynthetic genes to er stress and the upr. PLoS Genet (8), e1002890. Mori, K., 2009. Signalling pathways in the unfolded protein response: Development from yeast to mammals. J Biochem 146 (6), 743-50. Neuhaus-Steinmetz, U., Rensing, L., 1997. Heat shock protein induction by certain chemical stressors is correlated with their cytotoxicity, lipophilicity and protein-denaturing capacity. Toxicology 123 (3), 185-95. Ng, D.T., 2005. Screening for mutants defective in secretory protein maturation and er quality control. Methods 35 (4), 366-72. Nguyen, D.T., Kebache, S., Fazel, A., Wong, H.N., Jenna, S., Emadali, A., Lee, E.H., Bergeron, J.J., Kaufman, R.J., Larose, L., Chevet, E., 2004. Nck-dependent activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase-1 and regulation of cell survival during endoplasmic reticulum stress. Mol Biol Cell 15 (9), 4248-60. Nishikawa, S., Endo, T., 1997. The yeast jem1p is a dnaj-like protein of the endoplasmic reticulum membrane required for nuclear fusion. J Biol Chem 272 (20), 12889-92. Nishikawa, S.I., Fewell, S.W., Kato, Y., Brodsky, J.L., Endo, T., 2001. Molecular chaperones in the yeast endoplasmic reticulum maintain the solubility of proteins for retrotranslocation and degradation. J Cell Biol 153 (5), 1061-70. Norgaard, P., Westphal, V., Tachibana, C., Alsoe, L., Holst, B., Winther, J.R., 2001. Functional differences in yeast protein disulfide isomerases. J Cell Biol 152 (3), 553-62. 178 Normington, K., Kohno, K., Kozutsumi, Y., Gething, M.J., Sambrook, J., 1989. S. Cerevisiae encodes an essential protein homologous in sequence and function to mammalian bip. Cell 57 (7), 1223-36. Novick, P., Field, C., Schekman, R., 1980. Identification of 23 complementation groups required for post-translational events in the yeast secretory pathway. Cell 21 (1), 205-15. Novick, P., Schekman, R., 1979. Secretion and cell-surface growth are blocked in a temperature-sensitive mutant of saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 76 (4), 1858-62. Nuoffer, C., Jeno, P., Conzelmann, A., Riezman, H., 1991. Determinants for glycophospholipid anchoring of the saccharomyces cerevisiae gas1 protein to the plasma membrane. Mol Cell Biol 11 (1), 27-37. Okada, T., Yoshida, H., Akazawa, R., Negishi, M., Mori, K., 2002. Distinct roles of activating transcription factor (atf6) and double-stranded rna-activated protein kinase-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (perk) in transcription during the mammalian unfolded protein response. Biochem J 366 (Pt 2), 585-94. Oono, K., Yoneda, T., Manabe, T., Yamagishi, S., Matsuda, S., Hitomi, J., Miyata, S., Mizuno, T., Imaizumi, K., Katayama, T., Tohyama, M., 2004. Jab1 participates in unfolded protein responses by association and dissociation with ire1. Neurochem Int 45 (5), 765-72. Oyadomari, S., Mori, M., 2004. Roles of chop/gadd153 in endoplasmic reticulum stress. Cell Death Differ 11 (4), 381-9. Parlati, F., Dominguez, M., Bergeron, J.J., Thomas, D.Y., 1995. Saccharomyces cerevisiae cne1 encodes an endoplasmic reticulum (er) membrane protein with sequence similarity to calnexin and calreticulin and functions as a constituent of the er quality control apparatus. J Biol Chem 270 (1), 244-53. Pincus, D., Chevalier, M.W., Aragon, T., Van Anken, E., Vidal, S.E., El-Samad, H., Walter, P., 2010. Bip binding to the er-stress sensor ire1 tunes the homeostatic behavior of the unfolded protein response. PLoS Biol (7), e1000415. Plemper, R.K., Bohmler, S., Bordallo, J., Sommer, T., Wolf, D.H., 1997. Mutant analysis links the translocon and bip to retrograde protein transport for er degradation. Nature 388 (6645), 891-5. Ragni, E., Fontaine, T., Gissi, C., Latge, J.P., Popolo, L., 2007. The gas family of proteins of saccharomyces cerevisiae: Characterization and evolutionary analysis. Yeast 24 (4), 297-308. Ram, A.F., Kapteyn, J.C., Montijn, R.C., Caro, L.H., Douwes, J.E., Baginsky, W., Mazur, P., Van Den Ende, H., Klis, F.M., 1998. Loss of the plasma membrane-bound protein gas1p in saccharomyces cerevisiae results in the release of beta1,3-glucan into the medium and induces a compensation mechanism to ensure cell wall integrity. J Bacteriol 180 (6), 1418-24. Richardson, L.A., Reed, B.J., Charette, J.M., Freed, E.F., Fredrickson, E.K., Locke, M.N., Baserga, S.J., Gardner, R.G., 2012. A conserved deubiquitinating enzyme controls cell growth by regulating rna polymerase i stability. Cell Rep (2), 372-85. Rodriguez, D.A., Zamorano, S., Lisbona, F., Rojas-Rivera, D., Urra, H., Cubillos-Ruiz, J.R., Armisen, R., Henriquez, D.R., Cheng, E.H., Letek, M., Vaisar, T., Irrazabal, T., Gonzalez-Billault, C., Letai, A., Pimentel-Muinos, F.X., Kroemer, G., Hetz, C., 2012. Bh3-only proteins are part of a regulatory network that control the sustained signalling of the unfolded protein response sensor ire1alpha. EMBO J 31 (10), 232235. Rose, M.D., Misra, L.M., Vogel, J.P., 1989. Kar2, a karyogamy gene, is the yeast homolog of the mammalian bip/grp78 gene. Cell 57 (7), 1211-21. 179 Rose, M.D., Novick, P., Thomas, J.H., Botstein, D., Fink, G.R., 1987. A saccharomyces cerevisiae genomic plasmid bank based on a centromere-containing shuttle vector. Gene 60 (2-3), 237-43. Rubio, C., Pincus, D., Korennykh, A., Schuck, S., El-Samad, H., Walter, P., 2011. Homeostatic adaptation to endoplasmic reticulum stress depends on ire1 kinase activity. J Cell Biol 193 (1), 171-84. Ruegsegger, U., Leber, J.H., Walter, P., 2001. Block of hac1 mrna translation by long-range base pairing is released by cytoplasmic splicing upon induction of the unfolded protein response. Cell 107 (1), 103-14. Rutkowski, D.T., Kaufman, R.J., 2004. A trip to the er: Coping with stress. Trends Cell Biol 14 (1), 20-8. Saldanha, A.J., 2004. Java treeview--extensible visualization of microarray data. Bioinformatics 20 (17), 3246-8. Saris, N., Holkeri, H., Craven, R.A., Stirling, C.J., Makarow, M., 1997. The hsp70 homologue lhs1p is involved in a novel function of the yeast endoplasmic reticulum, refolding and stabilization of heat-denatured protein aggregates. J Cell Biol 137 (4), 813-24. Sato, Y., Nadanaka, S., Okada, T., Okawa, K., Mori, K., 2011. Luminal domain of atf6 alone is sufficient for sensing endoplasmic reticulum stress and subsequent transport to the golgi apparatus. Cell Struct Funct 36 (1), 35-47. Schindler, A.J., Schekman, R., 2009. In vitro reconstitution of er-stress induced atf6 transport in copii vesicles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106 (42), 17775-80. Schlenstedt, G., Harris, S., Risse, B., Lill, R., Silver, P.A., 1995. A yeast dnaj homologue, scj1p, can function in the endoplasmic reticulum with bip/kar2p via a conserved domain that specifies interactions with hsp70s. J Cell Biol 129 (4), 979-88. Shamaei-Tousi, A., Halcox, J.P., Henderson, B., 2007. Stressing the obvious? Cell stress and cell stress proteins in cardiovascular disease. Cardiovasc Res 74 (1), 19-28. Shen, J., Snapp, E.L., Lippincott-Schwartz, J., Prywes, R., 2005a. Stable binding of atf6 to bip in the endoplasmic reticulum stress response. Mol Cell Biol 25 (3), 921-32. Shen, X., Ellis, R.E., Sakaki, K., Kaufman, R.J., 2005b. Genetic interactions due to constitutive and inducible gene regulation mediated by the unfolded protein response in c. Elegans. PLoS Genet (3), e37. Sidrauski, C., Cox, J.S., Walter, P., 1996. Trna ligase is required for regulated mrna splicing in the unfolded protein response. Cell 87 (3), 405-13. Sidrauski, C., Walter, P., 1997. The transmembrane kinase ire1p is a site-specific endonuclease that initiates mrna splicing in the unfolded protein response. Cell 90 (6), 1031-9. Silberstein, S., Schlenstedt, G., Silver, P.A., Gilmore, R., 1998. A role for the dnaj homologue scj1p in protein folding in the yeast endoplasmic reticulum. J Cell Biol 143 (4), 921-33. Simons, J.F., Ferro-Novick, S., Rose, M.D., Helenius, A., 1995. Bip/kar2p serves as a molecular chaperone during carboxypeptidase y folding in yeast. J Cell Biol 130 (1), 41-9. Song, J.L., Wang, C.C., 1995. Chaperone-like activity of protein disulfide-isomerase in the refolding of rhodanese. Eur J Biochem 231 (2), 312-6. Stearns, T., Ma, H., Botstein, D., 1990. Manipulating yeast genome using plasmid vectors. Methods Enzymol 185, 280-97. Steel, G.J., Fullerton, D.M., Tyson, J.R., Stirling, C.J., 2004. Coordinated activation of hsp70 chaperones. Science 303 (5654), 98-101. Szegezdi, E., Logue, S.E., Gorman, A.M., Samali, A., 2006. Mediators of endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced apoptosis. EMBO Rep (9), 880-5. Tachibana, C., Stevens, T.H., 1992. The yeast eug1 gene encodes an endoplasmic reticulum protein that is functionally related to protein disulfide isomerase. Mol Cell Biol 12 (10), 4601-11. 180 Tachikawa, H., Funahashi, W., Takeuchi, Y., Nakanishi, H., Nishihara, R., Katoh, S., Gao, X.D., Mizunaga, T., Fujimoto, D., 1997. Overproduction of mpd2p suppresses the lethality of protein disulfide isomerase depletion in a cxxc sequence dependent manner. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 239 (3), 710-4. Tachikawa, H., Miura, T., Katakura, Y., Mizunaga, T., 1991. Molecular structure of a yeast gene, pdi1, encoding protein disulfide isomerase that is essential for cell growth. J Biochem 110 (2), 306-13. Tachikawa, H., Takeuchi, Y., Funahashi, W., Miura, T., Gao, X.D., Fujimoto, D., Mizunaga, T., Onodera, K., 1995. Isolation and characterization of a yeast gene, mpd1, the overexpression of which suppresses inviability caused by protein disulfide isomerase depletion. FEBS Lett 369 (2-3), 212-6. Teske, B.F., Wek, S.A., Bunpo, P., Cundiff, J.K., Mcclintick, J.N., Anthony, T.G., Wek, R.C., 2011. The eif2 kinase perk and the integrated stress response facilitate activation of atf6 during endoplasmic reticulum stress. Mol Biol Cell 22 (22), 4390-405. Thibault, G., Ismail, N., Ng, D.T., 2011. The unfolded protein response supports cellular robustness as a broad-spectrum compensatory pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108 (51), 20597-602. Thibault, G., Ng, D.T., 2012. The endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation pathways of budding yeast. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol (12). Thibault, G., Shui, G., Kim, W., Mcalister, G.C., Ismail, N., Gygi, S.P., Wenk, M.R., Ng, D.T., 2012. The membrane stress response buffers lethal effects of lipid disequilibrium by reprogramming the protein homeostasis network. Mol Cell 48 (1), 16-27. Tian, G., Xiang, S., Noiva, R., Lennarz, W.J., Schindelin, H., 2006. The crystal structure of yeast protein disulfide isomerase suggests cooperativity between its active sites. Cell 124 (1), 61-73. Travers, K.J., Patil, C.K., Wodicka, L., Lockhart, D.J., Weissman, J.S., Walter, P., 2000. Functional and genomic analyses reveal an essential coordination between the unfolded protein response and er-associated degradation. Cell 101 (3), 249-58. Tripathi, A., Ren, Y., Jeffrey, P.D., Hughson, F.M., 2009. Structural characterization of tip20p and dsl1p, subunits of the dsl1p vesicle tethering complex. Nat Struct Mol Biol 16 (2), 114-23. Tsvetanova, N.G., Riordan, D.P., Brown, P.O., 2012. The yeast rab gtpase ypt1 modulates unfolded protein response dynamics by regulating the stability of hac1 rna. PLoS Genet (7), e1002862. Tyson, J.R., Stirling, C.J., 2000. Lhs1 and sil1 provide a lumenal function that is essential for protein translocation into the endoplasmic reticulum. EMBO J 19 (23), 6440-52. Van Den Hazel, H.B., Kielland-Brandt, M.C., Winther, J.R., 1996. Review: Biosynthesis and function of yeast vacuolar proteases. Yeast 12 (1), 1-16. Van Huizen, R., Martindale, J.L., Gorospe, M., Holbrook, N.J., 2003. P58ipk, a novel endoplasmic reticulum stress-inducible protein and potential negative regulator of eif2alpha signaling. J Biol Chem 278 (18), 15558-64. Vembar, S.S., Jonikas, M.C., Hendershot, L.M., Weissman, J.S., Brodsky, J.L., 2010. J domain co-chaperone specificity defines the role of bip during protein translocation. J Biol Chem 285 (29), 22484-94. Verghese, J., Abrams, J., Wang, Y., Morano, K.A., 2012. Biology of the heat shock response and protein chaperones: Budding yeast (saccharomyces cerevisiae) as a model system. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 76 (2), 115-58. Vitu, E., Gross, E., Greenblatt, H.M., Sevier, C.S., Kaiser, C.A., Fass, D., 2008. Yeast mpd1p reveals the structural diversity of the protein disulfide isomerase family. J Mol Biol 384 (3), 631-40. 181 Vogel, J.P., Misra, L.M., Rose, M.D., 1990. Loss of bip/grp78 function blocks translocation of secretory proteins in yeast. J Cell Biol 110 (6), 1885-95. Volmer, R., Van Der Ploeg, K., Ron, D., 2013. Membrane lipid saturation activates endoplasmic reticulum unfolded protein response transducers through their transmembrane domains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110 (12), 4628-33. Walter, P., Ron, D., 2011. The unfolded protein response: From stress pathway to homeostatic regulation. Science 334 (6059), 1081-6. Wang, F.M., Chen, Y.J., Ouyang, H.J., 2011. Regulation of unfolded protein response modulator xbp1s by acetylation and deacetylation. Biochem J 433 (1), 245-52. Wang, Q., Chang, A., 1999. Eps1, a novel pdi-related protein involved in er quality control in yeast. EMBO J 18 (21), 5972-82. Wang, Q., Chang, A., 2003. Substrate recognition in er-associated degradation mediated by eps1, a member of the protein disulfide isomerase family. EMBO J 22 (15), 3792-802. Wang, S., Ng, D.T., 2010. Evasion of endoplasmic reticulum surveillance makes wsc1p an obligate substrate of golgi quality control. Mol Biol Cell 21 (7), 1153-65. Welihinda, A.A., Tirasophon, W., Green, S.R., Kaufman, R.J., 1997. Gene induction in response to unfolded protein in the endoplasmic reticulum is mediated through ire1p kinase interaction with a transcriptional coactivator complex containing ada5p. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94 (9), 4289-94. Welihinda, A.A., Tirasophon, W., Green, S.R., Kaufman, R.J., 1998. Protein serine/threonine phosphatase ptc2p negatively regulates the unfolded-protein response by dephosphorylating ire1p kinase. Mol Cell Biol 18 (4), 1967-77. Welihinda, A.A., Tirasophon, W., Kaufman, R.J., 1999. The cellular response to protein misfolding in the endoplasmic reticulum. Gene Expr (4-6), 293-300. Welihinda, A.A., Tirasophon, W., Kaufman, R.J., 2000. The transcriptional co-activator ada5 is required for hac1 mrna processing in vivo. J Biol Chem 275 (5), 3377-81. Xiao, R., Wilkinson, B., Solovyov, A., Winther, J.R., Holmgren, A., Lundstrom-Ljung, J., Gilbert, H.F., 2004. The contributions of protein disulfide isomerase and its homologues to oxidative protein folding in the yeast endoplasmic reticulum. J Biol Chem 279 (48), 49780-6. Xie, W., Kanehara, K., Sayeed, A., Ng, D.T., 2009. Intrinsic conformational determinants signal protein misfolding to the hrd1/htm1 endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation system. Mol Biol Cell 20 (14), 3317-29. Xu, C., Wang, S., Thibault, G., Ng, D.T., 2013. Futile protein folding cycles in the er are terminated by the unfolded protein o-mannosylation pathway. Science 340 (6135), 978-81. Xu, X., Azakami, H., Kato, A., 2004a. P-domain and lectin site are involved in the chaperone function of saccharomyces cerevisiae calnexin homologue. FEBS Lett 570 (1-3), 15560. Xu, X., Kanbara, K., Azakami, H., Kato, A., 2004b. Expression and characterization of saccharomyces cerevisiae cne1p, a calnexin homologue. J Biochem 135 (5), 615-8. Yan, W., Frank, C.L., Korth, M.J., Sopher, B.L., Novoa, I., Ron, D., Katze, M.G., 2002. Control of perk eif2alpha kinase activity by the endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced molecular chaperone p58ipk. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99 (25), 15920-5. Yoshida, H., Matsui, T., Yamamoto, A., Okada, T., Mori, K., 2001. Xbp1 mrna is induced by atf6 and spliced by ire1 in response to er stress to produce a highly active transcription factor. Cell 107 (7), 881-91. Yoshida, H., Uemura, A., Mori, K., 2009. Pxbp1(u), a negative regulator of the unfolded protein response activator pxbp1(s), targets atf6 but not atf4 in proteasomemediated degradation. Cell Struct Funct 34 (1), 1-10. 182 Zhou, J., Liu, C.Y., Back, S.H., Clark, R.L., Peisach, D., Xu, Z., Kaufman, R.J., 2006. The crystal structure of human ire1 luminal domain reveals a conserved dimerization interface required for activation of the unfolded protein response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103 (39), 14343-8. 183 [...]... identified in a study to find genes which complemented a karyogamy mutant (Rose et al 1989) Unexpectedly, this gene was found to be identical to the one cloned by a separate group trying to isolate the yeast homolog of BiP - a mammalian ER Hsp70 believed to help in the folding of membrane and secretory proteins (Normington et al 1989) KAR2 encodes a protein that is 67% identical to that of mouse BiP,... together to perform the important task of producing soluble proteins that are secreted and allow communication or interaction with the external milieu The secretory pathway consists of the rough endoplasmic reticulum (ER), ER exit sites, the ER to golgi intermediate compartment, the golgi complex and the subsequent transport of secretory vesicles The pathway is modulated by intracellular and extracellular... aims to increase ER folding capacity by ER expansion, increasing the number of chaperones and folding factors, increasing degradation of 20 misfolded proteins, and decreasing protein load through translation attenuation When ER homeostasis fails to be restored, apoptosis is initiated 1.2.1 Sensing ER stress Since folding of secretory and transmembrane proteins occur primarily in the ER, perturbations to. .. binds ER targeting sequences on nascent polypeptides, and localizes the ribosome complex to the ER via binding to the SRP receptor The nascent polypeptide is transported across the Sec61 channel while being translated In the post-translational mode, translated polypeptides in the cytosol are targeted to and imported into the ER via the TRC40 (mammalian) or GET (yeast) pathway As nascent polypeptide chains... 1.Introduction 1.1.The secretory pathway in eukaryotes As organisms evolve from prokaryotes to eukaryotes, there is increasing complexity in cellular layout, structure, and function One of the hallmarks of eukaryotes is the compartmentalization of the cell into distinct subcellular organelles, each with its own tailor-made environment that has been optimized for its specific function The secretory pathway in eukaryotes... processing of secretory and transmembrane proteins that pass through the secretory pathway It plays a pivotal role in ensuring that proteins fold into their native structures, and that unfolded/ misfolded proteins are recognized, retained, and targeted for degradation by quality control machineries To ensure that misfolded and unfolded proteins do not accumulate and lead to cell toxicity, the ER regulates... secretory capacity accordingly to deal with the demands of cell growth, survival and homeostasis (Farhan and Rabouille 2011) 1.1.1 Protein folding in the secretory pathway The ER is the main site where folding and processing of secretory and membrane proteins take place It has been estimated that a third of cellular proteins pass through the ER As such, the ER can be regarded as the protein folding factory... stress conditions as well, such as exposure to heavy metals and cytotoxic chemicals (NeuhausSteinmetz and Rensing 1997), oxidative insults, ischaemia/reperfusion and hemorrhagic shock (De Maio 1999) Members of the HSPs are classified according to their molecular weight In the ER of the budding yeast, two main groups of HSPs - Hsp70 and Hsp40, are present to maintain protein homeostasis Each member... glycoproteins in the ER to ensure their proper folding (Ellgaard et al 1999), and its yeast homolog, Cne1p, is believed to be involved in the folding of glycoproteins and their quality control (Parlati et al 1995) Cne1p possesses a conserved lectin domain which has been shown to bind monoglucosylated oligosaccharide, and a P- (proline-rich) domain that was shown to be required for Cne1p's ability to suppress aggregation... and that mammalian Ire1 similarly forms oligomers (Li et al 2010) Taken together, studies to date suggest that in yeast, ER stress is sensed by the direct binding of accumulated unfolded proteins to the cLD of Ire1p and promotes clustering of Ire1p Kar2p plays a modulatory role in this process by tuning the extent of UPR activation to be on par with the severity of the ER stress 1.2.1.2 Ire1, PERK, and . USING COMPENSATION -ATTENUATED GENETICS TO UNDERSTAND UNDERLYING NETWORKS GOVERNING CELLULAR ROBUSTNESS WANG SIHUI (B.Sc. (Hons)),. This suggests that different chaperone networks in the ER can buffer one another during ER stress, and may work in synergy to contribute to cellular robustness. vii List of Tables Table. were occurring (Shamaei-Tousi et al. 2007). HSPs were later found to be induced under other types of stress conditions as well, such as exposure to heavy metals and cytotoxic chemicals (Neuhaus- Steinmetz

Ngày đăng: 10/09/2015, 09:26

Mục lục

  • Declaration

  • Acknowledgements

  • Abstract

  • List of Tables

  • List of Figures

  • List of Abbreviations

  • Chapter 1.Introduction

    • 1.1.The secretory pathway in eukaryotes

      • 1.1.1. Protein folding in the secretory pathway

        • 1.1.1.1. HSP family of chaperones

          • 1.1.1.1.1. ER Hsp70s in S.cerevisiae - Kar2p and Lhs1p

          • 1.1.1.1.2. ER Hsp40s in S.cerevisiae - Sec63p, Jem1p, and Scj1p

          • 1.1.1.1.3. Nucleotide exchange factor in S.cerevisiae - Sil1

          • 1.1.1.2. ER glycoprotein chaperone - Cne1p

          • 1.1.1.3. PDI family of oxidoreductases

            • 1.1.1.3.1. PDI1

            • 1.1.1.3.5. Homologs of PDI1

            • 1.1.2. Protein quality control

            • 1.2. The unfolded protein response

              • 1.2.1. Sensing ER stress

                • 1.2.1.1. Ire1p as the sole stress sensor in yeast

                • 1.2.1.2. Ire1, PERK, and ATF6 stress sensors in metazoans

                  • 1.2.1.2.1. Ire1

                  • 1.2.1.2.2. PERK

                  • 1.2.1.2.3. ATF6

                  • 1.2.2. UPR activation and regulation

                    • 1.2.2.1. Activation via splicing of HAC1 mRNA in yeast

                    • 1.2.2.2. Activation of the UPR in higher eukaryotes

                      • 1.2.2.2.1. Ire1-dependent XBP1 splicing

                      • 1.2.2.2.2. PERK-dependent eIF2α phosphorylation

Tài liệu cùng người dùng

  • Đang cập nhật ...

Tài liệu liên quan