intelligent e supply chain decision support pdf

33 232 0
intelligent e supply chain decision support pdf

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

Thông tin tài liệu

University of Minnesota – Digital Technology Center December 2002 Intelligent e-Supply Chain Decision Support Norman M. Sadeh Norman M. Sadeh e e - - Supply Chain Management Laboratory Supply Chain Management Laboratory School of Computer Science School of Computer Science Carnegie Mellon University Carnegie Mellon University Copyright © 2002 Norman Sadeh Outline   Supply Chain Management: New Context Supply Chain Management: New Context   Agent Agent - - Based Collaborative Decision Support Based Collaborative Decision Support   Mascot Mascot   Available Available - - To To - - Promise/Capacity Promise/Capacity - - To To - - Promise Promise Functionality Functionality   Empirical Results Empirical Results   Dynamic Supply Chain Management Practices Dynamic Supply Chain Management Practices   Early Results Early Results   TAC TAC ’ ’ 03: A Supply Chain Trading Competition 03: A Supply Chain Trading Competition   Summary and Concluding Remarks Summary and Concluding Remarks Copyright © 2002 Norman Sadeh Supply Chain Management   Planning and coordinating procurement, production and Planning and coordinating procurement, production and distribution activities distribution activities   From raw material suppliers to manufacturers From raw material suppliers to manufacturers … … to to distribution centers distribution centers … … to retailers and consumers to retailers and consumers   Trillions of dollars annually Trillions of dollars annually   Good practices directly impact the competitiveness of Good practices directly impact the competitiveness of companies companies   Timely and cost Timely and cost - - effective delivery of products to effective delivery of products to customers customers   Extends to product design and configuration Extends to product design and configuration Copyright © 2002 Norman Sadeh Why is SCM Difficult?   Involves multiple organizations Involves multiple organizations   Each organization tries to satisfy multiple objectives Each organization tries to satisfy multiple objectives   Cost, timeliness, quality, market share, etc. Cost, timeliness, quality, market share, etc.   Each organization operates subject to: Each organization operates subject to:   Internal Considerations Internal Considerations : :   Finite capacity, existing inventory, etc. Finite capacity, existing inventory, etc.   External Considerations External Considerations   Available suppliers and their capacities, order Available suppliers and their capacities, order quantities and due dates, contractual quantities and due dates, contractual arrangements, transportation constraints, etc. arrangements, transportation constraints, etc.   Numerous sources of uncertainty Numerous sources of uncertainty   Capacity, supplies, demand, etc. Capacity, supplies, demand, etc. Copyright © 2002 Norman Sadeh Historical Perspective Purchasing Production Sales Distribution Materials Management Manufacturing Management Distribution Customers Suppliers Suppliers Internal Supply Chain Customers Buyers/ Sellers Buyers/ Sellers Buyers/ Sellers Buyers/ Sellers Inventory Control e-Commerce e-Markets/Exchanges e-Supply Chains Functional Silos Enterprise Integration Dynamic Internet-enabled Supply Chain Supply Chain Integration Copyright © 2002 Norman Sadeh Beyond the Early eMarket Hype   Dynamic business practices are mainly confined to Dynamic business practices are mainly confined to MRO MRO   Suppliers don Suppliers don ’ ’ t like being evaluated solely based on t like being evaluated solely based on price price   Covisint Covisint , E2open exchanges: more emphasis , E2open exchanges: more emphasis on supporting collaboration on supporting collaboration   Requires richer environments Requires richer environments • • Multiple attributes Multiple attributes – – not just price not just price   Lack of adequate standards Lack of adequate standards   Lack of adequate decision support tools Lack of adequate decision support tools   Evaluate a large number of options Evaluate a large number of options   Standardization efforts are taking time Standardization efforts are taking time Copyright © 2002 Norman Sadeh Some Open Research Issues   Long vs. Short term contracts Long vs. Short term contracts   Information exchange Information exchange   Collaborative decision support Collaborative decision support   Multi Multi - - attribute negotiation attribute negotiation   Peer Peer - - To To - - Peer/local view vs. more Peer/local view vs. more lobal lobal view view   P2P Challenge P2P Challenge : Coordinating negotiation across : Coordinating negotiation across multiple tiers multiple tiers   Challenge for the Global View Challenge for the Global View : :   Creating the right incentives for information sharing Creating the right incentives for information sharing   How global? How often do you clear? etc. How global? How often do you clear? etc. Copyright © 2002 Norman Sadeh MASCOT: Collaborative Decision Support   Decisions are evaluated in Decisions are evaluated in collaboration collaboration with with potential business partners potential business partners   Supply chains can be Supply chains can be dynamically dynamically set up in set up in response to changing market requirements response to changing market requirements   Emphasis on Mixed Initiative Decision Emphasis on Mixed Initiative Decision Support Support   Don Don ’ ’ t try to automate everything! t try to automate everything! Copyright © 2002 Norman Sadeh MASCOT Supply Chain Agent Bidding & Order Mgmt. Planning & Scheduling Procurement Business Entity Enterprise Level Mascot Agent Tier 1 Suppliers eMarket eMarket eMarket Site Level Mascot Agent Site Level Mascot Agent Prospective Customer Request for Quote eMarket Copyright © 2002 Norman Sadeh MASCOT: Overall Objectives   Leverage benefits of finite scheduling Leverage benefits of finite scheduling   Rapid and accurate evaluation of partner Rapid and accurate evaluation of partner - - dependent dependent decisions : decisions :   Bids & Requests for Quotes Bids & Requests for Quotes • • including real including real - - time ATP/CTP time ATP/CTP   Alternative product/subcomponent designs Alternative product/subcomponent designs   Make Make - - or or - - buy decisions buy decisions   Customizable mixed Customizable mixed - - initiative functionality initiative functionality   Collaborative solution development, Collaborative solution development, workflow management workflow management   Facilitate integration with legacy systems Facilitate integration with legacy systems [...]... Context Modified Copy of Context U/C: Modify Assumptions within Context (“What-if”) U/C: Select Unresolved Issue to Resolve Unresolved Issue Selected Unresolved Issue Selected Resolution Method Blackboard: Update Unresolved Issues Modified Context KS: Execute Resolution Method Activated Agenda Item U/C = User or Controller Copyright ©2002 Norman Sadeh U/C: Select Resolution Method Controller: Activate... policies and different order promising policies Copyright ©2002 Norman Sadeh Dynamic Supply Chain Coordination •orders •requests for bid •bid acceptance/rejection •order cancelation/modification Supply chain entity Supply chain entity Supply chain entity Copyright ©2002 Norman Sadeh Supply chain entity •products •bid submissions •revised delivery dates The Coordination Challenge    Generate robust yet... uncertainty at each tier due to resource breakdowns and variations in processing times  Stochastic order arrival  Finite capacity schedules regenerated daily    Micro-Boss scheduling system JIT objective: minimize sum of tardiness & inventory costs Execution priority in accordance with the latest released schedule Copyright ©2002 Norman Sadeh Evaluation Criteria  Number of bids refused or rejected... materials, in-process, finished goods), late delivery penalties, etc  Takes into account impact on prior commitments  e. g late delivery penalty when another order gets bumped  Bid only if overall profit increases  Other variations can be considered  e. g strategic customers, market share considerations Copyright ©2002 Norman Sadeh  Empirical Study: Multiple RFQ Processing Policies   Response:... Customer Main Architectural Features    Blackboard Contexts: “What-if”  Different assumptions (e. g demand, resources, suppliers) and different solutions  Unresolved issues Extensible set of Knowledge Sources (KSs)  Allows for modular & reusable KSs  Provides for easy integration with legacy systems Mixed Initiative Control  Customizable user profile Copyright ©2002 Norman Sadeh Unresolved Issues... Customizable Agent Wrapper Controller Control Profile Control KB Agenda GUI Bidding/Order Mgmt KS Current working context Blackboard BOM/Flow Config KS Demand Explosion KS Contexts Scheduling/CTP KS RFQ/Procurement KS Knowledge Sources Event Queue Communication KS Outgoing messages Enterprise System External Systems Incoming Events Copyright ©2002 Norman Sadeh eMarket Portal Potential Business Partner Potential... Resolution Method Status   Customized to support coordination between a machine shop and a tool shop at Raytheon  Over 150 machine centers & over 100 people  50% of incoming orders require new tools  alternative BOM & process planning options  Reduced tardiness by 23 percent  Integration of process planning & scheduling  Tighter coordination Used to study the benefits of different supply chain. .. Considerations     Net Demand: Inventory Allocation & Demand Explosion Scheduling  Available vs modified capacity  Schedule around prior commitments vs reoptimization  Schedule Reoptimization  Assess impact on prior commitments  Costs & Priorities: order priorities, late delivery penalties, inventory costs, etc  Other Tradeoff: Speed versus “optimality” Assess desirability & decide whether to... that date The manufacturer’s capacity is finite Each order requires a number of components for which suppliers have submitted bids  Supply bids include a price and delivery date Copyright ©2002 Norman Sadeh Supplier Bid Selection Supplier Bid Supplier Bid Supplier Bid Component 11 (Price, Delivery Date) Order 1 Supplier Bid Supplier Bid Supplier Bid Component 12 Supplier Bid Supplier Bid Supplier Bid... rejected  Number of tardy orders  Average utilization of the most utilized resource  Average supply chain leadtimes  Average due-date adjustment (as part of bid negotiation)  Profit (sales revenue minus costs)    Total in-system inventory costs (WIP and finished goods) Total tardiness costs Promise date accuracy Copyright ©2002 Norman Sadeh Basic Supply Chain Configuration Supply chain External . 1 Suppliers eMarket eMarket eMarket Site Level Mascot Agent Site Level Mascot Agent Prospective Customer Request for Quote eMarket Copyright © 2002 Norman Sadeh MASCOT: Overall Objectives   Leverage. University of Minnesota – Digital Technology Center December 2002 Intelligent e- Supply Chain Decision Support Norman M. Sadeh Norman M. Sadeh e e - - Supply Chain Management Laboratory Supply Chain. like being evaluated solely based on t like being evaluated solely based on price price   Covisint Covisint , E2 open exchanges: more emphasis , E2 open exchanges: more emphasis on supporting

Ngày đăng: 28/06/2014, 18:20

Tài liệu cùng người dùng

Tài liệu liên quan