Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)
Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account whendeciding on the punishment.Discuss bot
Overall band score 9+9+9+9 See below C&C LR GRA Model answer WRITING TASK You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Write about the following topic: Some people believe that there should be a fixed punishment for each type of crime Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment Discuss both views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience Write at least 250 words Original answer Some people hold the belief that the government should implement a standardized punishment for every offender of a particular crime While there are good grounds for advocating this proposal, I would argue that punishment should be tailored to the case Granted, proponents of uniform punishment might argue that they are necessary for consistency and fairness in the justice system Every transgression, they say, should have a clear and predefined punishment, so that everyone knows what to expect if they commit an unlawful act Not only would this simplify the procedure of administering justice, but it could also minimize the risk of bias or discrimination For example, in many nations, the penalty for driving under the influence of alcohol is a fixed fine and license suspension, regardless of the circumstances of the offense This makes the process of meting out punishment for drunk drivers there fast and fair for everyone Notwithstanding, I am convinced that the situation behind crimes varies from case to case, so punishment should be proportionate to the motivation for the crime, the severity of the offense, and the offender's personal circumstances To illustrate, a first-time offender who steals to feed their family should deserve a lighter sentence than one who repeatedly steals for personal gain By the same token, the punishment for a crime committed in self-defense should be different than that for one with premeditation Were universal punishment applied to such cases, I feel it would be rather unjust and inhumane To summarize, while fixed punishments have certain benefits, I side with opponents of this one-size-fit-all approach, believing that an equitable legal system should take into account the special aspects of each individual case Overall band score 9+9+9+9 TR – Task Response nb – GRA and LR errors have not been corrected Band score Excellent answer You have a clear position throughout and all parts of the question are addressed Your position is coherent and well-argued The ideas are relevant, extended, and coherent Another argument for fixed punishments is that there are often stories in the media about criminals getting lenient sentences, which enrages the public (according to the tabloids) Fixed punishments would limit judges in their freedom to give excessively lenient or harsh sentences Another approach would be to say the proposal would work for less serious crimes that don’t carry a custodial sentence, but for more serious crimes, such as those involving violence or offences against property, it makes sense to weigh up the attenuating or aggravating circumstances Advice On Brainstorming For Task As you’re planning and writing your answer, remember to constantly ask yourself if you’re answering the question Check back to the question a few times as you think of ideas to make sure they're directly relevant Make sure your introduction directly addresses the question Make sure your ideas address all parts of the question If the question asks for solutions, in the plural, you must suggest at least Make sure your main ideas, as stated in the first sentence of the main body paragraphs, are directly relevant to the question Make sure your supporting ideas, which follow the main ideas in the main body paragraphs, directly support the main idea Be especially careful if you’ve answered similar question before, as there will always be important differences Make sure your conclusion directly answers the question, that it is consistent with the ideas in the main bodies, and that it does not contradict the introduction Some people hold the belief that the government should implement a standardized punishment for every offender of a particular crime While there are good grounds for advocating this proposal, I would argue that punishment should be tailored to the case.[a] Granted, proponents of uniform punishment might argue that they are necessary for consistency and fairness in the justice system [b]Every transgression, they say, should have a clear and predefined punishment, so that everyone knows what to expect if they commit an unlawful act Not only would this simplify the procedure of administering justice, but it could also minimize the risk of bias or discrimination For example, in many nations, the penalty for driving under the influence of alcohol is a fixed fine and license suspension, regardless of the circumstances of the offense This makes the process of meting out punishment for drunk drivers there fast and fair for everyone.[c] Notwithstanding, I am convinced that the situation behind crimes varies from case to case, so punishment should be proportionate to the motivation for the crime, the severity of the offense, and the offender's personal circumstances [d] To illustrate, a first-time offender who steals to feed their family should deserve a lighter sentence than one who repeatedly steals for personal gain By the same token, the punishment for a crime committed in self-defense should be different than that for one with premeditation Were universal punishment applied to such cases, I feel it would be rather unjust and inhumane.[e] To summarize, while fixed punishments have certain benefits[f], I side with opponents of this one-size-fit-all approach, believing that an equitable legal system should take into account the special aspects of each individual case [g] C&C - Cohesion and Coherence nb GRA and LR errors have not been corrected Band score The organisation is excellent and easy to follow Use of cohesive devices and referencing is excellent throughout Paragraphing for Task I recommend you write paragraphs as follows: Write an introduction, that explains what the question is After reading the introduction, the reader should have a good idea what the essay is about, and what your position (opinion) is It should be possible to write an introduction in under 50 words It is not necessary to write a long background statement Write main body paragraphs This should allow you to expand on the ideas sufficiently to persuade the examiner that you’ve fully supported the main ideas If you write main bodies, it is more difficult to expand and support them sufficiently to get a high score If it’s a two-part question, answer the questions in the order they’re given and write one paragraph per question The main body paragraphs should be 100-120 words, and each paragraph should have a clear topic sentence and or more supporting ideas which support the topic sentence with reasons, evidence, and examples Do not waste time with lots of background information The topic sentences should directly address the question The conclusion should be consistent with the introduction and the main ideas, and it should not introduce new ideas It should directly answer the question Do not leave the examiner in any doubt about whether you’ve answered the question If you write a third paragraph in a discuss both sides question to clarify your position, make sure that give a good reason to reject one of the sides If you just restated the original ideas about one side, the examiner may decide you have covered one side more than the other It is also ok to write a third body paragraph in a to what extent question if you have main ideas which both agree and disagree with the proposition Avoid short paragraphs, with under 70 words, as it may be difficult to show a clear central topic in a short paragraph Some people hold the belief that the government should implement a standardized punishment for every offender of a particular crime While there are good grounds for advocating this proposal[h], I would argue that punishment should be tailored to the case[i] Granted, proponents of uniform punishment [j]might argue that they are necessary for consistency and fairness in the justice system [k]Every transgression, they say[l], should have a clear and predefined punishment, so that everyone knows what to expect if they commit an unlawful act Not only would this simplify the procedure of administering justice, but it could also [m]minimize the risk of bias or discrimination For example, in many nations, the penalty for driving under the influence of alcohol is a fixed fine and license suspension, regardless of the circumstances of the offense This makes the process [n]of meting out punishment for drunk drivers there fast and fair for everyone Notwithstanding, I am convinced that the situation behind crimes varies from case to case, so punishment should be proportionate to the motivation for the crime, the severity of the offense, and the offender's personal circumstances [o]To illustrate, a first-time offender who steals to feed their family should deserve a lighter sentence than one who repeatedly steals for personal gain[p] By the same token[q], the punishment for a crime committed in self-defense should be different than that for one with premeditation Were universal punishment applied to such cases, I feel it would be rather unjust and inhumane[r] To summarize, while fixed punishments have certain benefits, [s]I side with opponents of this one-size-fit-all approach, believing that an equitable legal system should take into account the special aspects of each individual case LR- - Lexical resource nb Some GRA errors have not been corrected Band score Vocabulary is used accurately with sufficient flexibility to show precise meaning, with a wide variety of vocabulary, used accurately and with a high level of control Some people hold the belief that [t]the government should implement a standardized punishment for every offender of a particular crime[u] While there are good grounds for advocating [v]this proposal, I would argue that punishment should be tailored to the case Granted, proponents of uniform punishment might argue that they are necessary for consistency and fairness in the justice system Every transgression, they say, should have a clear and predefined punishment, so that everyone knows what to expect if they commit an unlawful act[w] Not only would this simplify the procedure of administering justice, but it could also minimize the risk of bias or discrimination For example, in many nations, the penalty for driving under the influence of alcohol is a fixed fine and license suspension, regardless of the circumstances of the offense This makes the process of meting out punishment for drunk [x]drivers there fast and fair for everyone Notwithstanding, I am convinced that the situation behind crimes varies from case to case, so punishment should be proportionate to the motivation for the crime, the severity of the offense, and the offender's personal circumstances To illustrate, a first-time offender [y]who steals to feed their family should deserve a lighter sentence than one who repeatedly steals for personal gain By the same token, the punishment for a crime committed in self-defense should be different than [z]that for one with premeditation Were universal punishment applied to such cases, I feel it would be rather unjust and inhumane To summarize, while fixed punishments have certain benefits[aa], I side with opponents of this one-size-fit-all approach, believing that an equitable [ab]legal system should take into account the special aspects of each individual case GRA – Grammatical range and accuracy nb Some LR errors have not been corrected Band score Grammar is used accurately with a wide variety of structures, which should be good for a band score Punctuation is used correctly throughout Appropriate structures are used throughout Some people hold the belief that the government should implement a standardized punishment for every offender of a particular crime While there are good grounds for advocating this proposal, I would argue that punishment should be tailored to the case Granted, proponents of uniform punishment might argue that they [ac]are necessary for consistency and fairness in the justice system Every transgression, they say, should have a clear and predefined punishment, so that everyone knows what to expect if they commit an unlawful act Not only would this simplify the procedure of administering justice, but it could [ad]also minimize the risk of bias or discrimination For example, in many nations, the penalty for driving under the influence of alcohol is a fixed fine and license suspension, regardless of the circumstances of the offense This makes the process of meting out punishment for drunk drivers there fast and fair for everyone Notwithstanding[ae], I am convinced that the situation behind crimes varies from case to case, so punishment should be proportionate to the motivation for the crime, the severity of the offense, and the offender's personal circumstances To illustrate, a first-time offender who steals to feed their family should deserve a lighter sentence than one who repeatedly steals for personal gain By the same token, the punishment for a crime committed in self-defense should be different than that for one with premeditation Were universal punishment applied to such cases, I feel it would be rather unjust and inhumane To summarize, while fixed punishments have certain benefits, I side with opponents of this one-size-fit-all approach, believing that an equitable legal system should take into account the special aspects of each individual case