VIET NAM NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE FACULTY OF AGRONOMY -*** - UNDERGRADUATE THESIS TITLE: THE EFFECT OF DENSITY AND AMOUNT OF FERTILIER TO THE GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF TWO COMMON BEAN LINES DURING 2020 WINTER SEASON IN GIA LAM – HANOI STUDENT’S NAME : DO THI THAM STUDENT’S CODE : 611724 CLASS : K61-KHCTT SUPERVISOR : MS NGUYEN TUAN ANH DEPARTMENT : GENETICS AND PLANT BREEDING Ha Noi – March, 2021 DECLARATION I hereby declare that this paper is my own work All results and data in this thesis are absolutely honest and have not been submitted before to any institution for assessment purposes All sources used in this paper were cited in references i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS To complete this thesis, I am deeply indebted to people who have been providing me with precious support and advice Firstly, I would like to send my gratitude to my supervisor, MS Nguyen Tuan Anh, Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agronomy, Vietnam National University of Agriculture, for his enthusiastic support, helpful advice, and considerable encouragement in the completion of my thesis I would also like to express sincere thanks to the lecturers from the Faculty of Agronomy in general and lecturers in the Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding in particular, who taught and created the best conditions for students during the learning process and research Besides, my special thanks go to Dr Pham Thi Ngoc, Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding for her technical guidance in the field and in the laboratory Last but not least, I want to express my sincere thanks to my family and friends who have always been by my side, give me support and strength to complete this graduation thesis Ha Noi, March 1st 2021 Student Do Thi Tham ii CONTENTS DECLARATION i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ii CONTENTS iii LIST OF TABLES vii LIST OF FIGURES ix LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS x ABSTRACT xi CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Objectives and Requirements 1.2.1 Objectivess 1.2.2 Requirements CHAPTER II LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1 General introduction about common bean plants 2.1.1 Origin of common beans 2.1.2 Diversity in common bean 2.1.3 Usage of common bean 12 2.2 Bontany characteristics 13 2.2.1 Roots 13 2.2.2 Stems 14 2.2.3 Leaves 14 2.2.4 Flowers 14 2.2.5 Fruits 14 2.2.6 Seeds 15 2.3 The requirements of cultivated condition 15 2.3.1 Temperature 15 iii 2.3.2 Light 16 2.3.3 Water 17 2.3.4 Land 17 2.4 Production and research of common bean in the World 17 2.4.1 Production and research of common bean in the World 17 2.4.2 Research about fertilizer and density of common bean in the world 20 2.5 Production and research of common bean in Vietnam 21 2.5.1 Common bean production in Vietnam 21 2.5.2 Research of common bean in Vietnam 22 2.6 Production and market of common beans 24 2.6.1 Production 24 2.6.2 Market 26 2.7 Desired traits of new common bean variety 31 CHAPTER III MATERIALS AND RESEARCH METHODS 32 3.1 Research materials 32 3.2 Location, time and research methods 32 3.3.1 Experimental layout method 32 3.3.2 Applying fertilizer 33 3.3.3 Growing techniques 33 3.3.4 Growth stage 34 3.3.5 Agro-biological indicators: 36 3.3.6 Quality indicators 36 3.3.7 Yield and yield components 37 3.3.8 Pests and Diseases 37 3.3.9 Statistical analysis 38 CHAPTER IV RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 39 4.1 The growth stages of two common bean lines BH1 and BH2 in 2020 Winter season 39 iv 4.1.1 Time of gemination 39 4.1.2 Time of flowering 40 4.1.3 Time of fruiting 42 4.2 Effects of density and fertilizer on the growth and development of two common beans lines BH1 and BH2 in 2020 Winter season 44 4.2.1 Effects of density and fertilizer on growth of main stem height of two common bean lines BH1 and BH2 in 2020 Winter season 45 4.2.2 Effect of density and fertilizer on growth of leaves per plant of two common bean lines BH1 and BH2 in 2020 Winter season 47 4.2.3 Effects of density and amount of fertilizer on branch formation of two common bean lines BH1 and BH2 in Winter 2020 48 4.3 Effects of density and fertilizer on other indicators of fruit such as shape, size of two common bean lines BH1 and BH2 in 2020 Winter season 50 4.3.1 Fruit length of two common bean lines BH1 and BH2 in 2020 Winter season 50 4.3.2 Fruit width of two common bean lines BH1 and BH2 in 2020 Winter season 51 4.3.3 Fruit diameter of two common bean lines BH1 and BH2 in 2020 Winter season 52 4.3.4 Number of seed per fruit of two common bean lines BH1 and BH2 in 2020 Winter season 53 4.4 Effect of density and fertilizer on yield of two common bean lines BH1 and BH2 in 2020 Winter season 54 4.3.1 Effect of density and fertilizer on the number of flowers on the two common bean lines BH1 and BH2 in 2020 Winter season 54 4.3.2 Effect of density and fertilizer on the number of fruits on the two common bean lines BH1 and BH2 in 2020 Winter season 55 v 4.3.3 Effect of density and fertilizer on the average weight of fruit and individual productivity yield on the two common bean lines BH1 and BH2 in 2020 Winter season 56 4.5 Some quality indicators of fresh fruit of two common bean lines BH1 and BH2 in 2020 Winter season 59 4.6 Steam diameter final of two common bean lines BH1 and BH2 in 2020 Winter season 59 4.7 Pest and disease situation of two common bean lines BH1 and BH2 in 2020 Winter season 61 CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION 63 5.1 Conclusions 63 5.2 Recommendation 63 REFERENCES 64 APPENDIX 69 vi LIST OF TABLES Table 2.1: Characteristics of some common beans 11 Table 2.2: Table shows the temperature of common bean during the growing periods 15 Table 2.3: Production of common bean in the world since 2013 to 2017 24 Table 2.4: The production of common bean in some continents in the world 25 Table 2.5: Demographic and economic indicators of growth 27 Table 3.1: Discription of developmental stages of common bean 35 Table 3.2: Sensory evaluation of fresh fruits 36 Table 3.3: Evaluate levels of Root rot 37 Table 3.4: Evaluate the impact of Flea beetle 38 Table 4.1: The germination time of the two common bean lines BH1 (A) and BH2 (B) in 2020 Winter season (days) 39 Table 4.2: The flowering time of the two common bean lines BH1 (A) and BH2 (B) in 2020 Winter season (days) 41 Table 4.3: The fruiting time of the two common bean lines BH1 (A) and BH2 (B) in 2020 Winter season (days) 43 Table 4.4: The length of fruit in different density and fertilizer treatments of two common bean lines BH1 (A) and BH2 (B) in 2020 Winter season (cm) 50 Table 4.5: The width of fruit in different density and fertilizer formulas of two common bean lines BH1 (A) and BH2 (B) in 2020 Winter season (cm) 51 Table 4.6: The diameter of fruit in different density and fertilizer formulas of two common bean lines BH (A) and BH2 (B) in 2020 Winter season (cm) 52 vii Table 4.7: Number of seed per fruit in different density and fertilizer formulas of two common bean lines BH (A) and BH2 (B) in 2020 Winter season (cm) 53 Table 4.8: Number of flowers/bunches of two common bean lines BH1 (A) and BH2 (B) in 2020 Winter season 54 Table 4.9: Effect of density and fertilizer on the number of fruits/plant on the two common bean lines BH1 (A) and BH2 (B) in 2020 Winter 55 Table 4.10: Average weight fruit of two common bean lines BH1 (A) and BH2 (B) in 2020 Winter season (gram) 56 Table 4.11: Individual productivity fruit yield of two common bean lines BH1 (A) and BH2 (B) in 2020 Winter season (Gram) 57 Table 4.12: Some quality indicators of fruit collected when fresh 59 Table 4.13: The final stem diameters of the two lines common bean beans BH1 (A) and BH2 (B) in Winter 2020 (mm) 60 Table 4.14 Pest and disease situation of two common bean lines BH1 and BH2 in different density and fertilizer formulas in Winter 2020 61 viii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 3.1: Experimental layout table the RCBD method 33 Figure 4.1: The dynamics of growth in main stem height of the two common bean lines BH1 (A) and BH2 (B) in 2020 Winter season (cm) 44 Figure 4.2: The dynamics of growth in leaves of the two common bean lines BH1 (A) and BH2 (B) in 2020 Winter season 44 Figure 4.3: The dynamics of growth in branches of two common bean lines BH1 (A) and BH2 (B) in 2020 Winter season 45 Figure 4: Symbols of Fruit borer disease 62 ix Density A 5.525 5.625 5.400 5.550 B 5.625 5.575 5.500 5.500 C 5.600 5.600 5.425 5.525 Đặc điểm hình thái BH1 Statistical Tool for Agricultural Research (STAR) Wed Mar 03 11:55:17 2021 Analysis of Variance Split Plot in Randomized Complete Block Design ========================================================= ANALYSIS FOR RESPONSE VARIABLE: Mean.Length.of.fruit ========================================================= Summary Information FACTOR NO OF LEVELS LEVELS Density A, B, C Fertilizer F1, F2, F3, F4 Rep 1, Number of Observations Read and Used: 24 ANOVA TABLE Response Variable: Mean.Length.of.fruit Source DF Sum of Square Mean Square F Value Pr(> F) Rep 0.0704 0.0704 0.45 0.5715 Density 1.7180 0.8590 5.49 0.1541 Error(a) 0.3130 0.1565 Fertilizer 0.1078 0.0359 0.24 0.8676 Density:Fertilizer 2.0850 0.3475 2.30 0.1256 Error(b) 1.3580 0.1509 Total 23 5.6522 Summary Statistics CV(a)% CV(b)% Mean.Length.of.fruit Mean 2.47 2.42 16.05 Table of Means Fertilizer F1 F2 F3 F4 Density A 16.240 15.530 15.450 15.450 B 15.595 16.650 16.480 16.235 C 16.220 16.205 16.325 16.170 ======================================================== ANALYSIS FOR RESPONSE VARIABLE: Mean.Width.of.fruit ======================================================== Summary Information FACTOR NO OF LEVELS LEVELS Density A, B, C Fertilizer F1, F2, F3, F4 Rep 1, Number of Observations Read and Used: 24 ANOVA TABLE 90 Response Variable: Mean.Width.of.fruit Source DF Sum of Square Mean Square F Value Pr(> F) Rep 0.0143 0.0143 2.05 0.2883 Density 0.0232 0.0116 1.67 0.3745 Error(a) 0.0139 0.0069 Fertilizer 0.0040 0.0013 0.82 0.5128 Density:Fertilizer 0.0122 0.0020 1.27 0.3599 Error(b) 0.0145 0.0016 Total 23 0.0821 Summary Statistics -CV(a)% CV(b)% Mean.Width.of.fruit Mean -7.05 3.39 1.18 -Table of Means Fertilizer F1 F2 F3 F4 Density A 1.1525 1.1425 1.1575 1.1375 B 1.1725 1.2200 1.1725 1.1450 C 1.2325 1.1750 1.2725 1.2125 =========================================================== ANALYSIS FOR RESPONSE VARIABLE: Mean.Diameter.of.fruit =========================================================== Summary Information FACTOR NO OF LEVELS LEVELS Density A, B, C Fertilizer F1, F2, F3, F4 Rep 1, Number of Observations Read and Used: 24 ANOVA TABLE Response Variable: Mean.Diameter.of.fruit Source DF Sum of Square Mean Square F Value Pr(> F) Rep 0.0032 0.0032 2.09 0.2847 Density 0.0074 0.0037 2.45 0.2902 Error(a) 0.0030 0.0015 Fertilizer 0.0081 0.0027 2.09 0.1718 Density:Fertilizer 0.0100 0.0017 1.28 0.3539 Error(b) 0.0117 0.0013 Total 23 0.0432 Summary Statistics CV(a)% CV(b)% Mean.Diameter.of.fruit Mean 4.64 4.30 0.8360 Table of Means Fertilizer F1 F2 F3 F4 Density A 0.8600 0.8025 0.8025 0.7875 91 B 0.8400 0.8800 0.8375 0.8000 C 0.8750 0.8250 0.8875 0.8350 ========================================================= ANALYSIS FOR RESPONSE VARIABLE: Mean.Weight.of.fruit ========================================================= Summary Information FACTOR NO OF LEVELS LEVELS Density A, B, C Fertilizer F1, F2, F3, F4 Rep 1, Number of Observations Read and Used: 24 ANOVA TABLE Response Variable: Mean.Weight.of.fruit Source DF Sum of Square Mean Square F Value Pr(> F) Rep 0.0124 0.0124 0.01 0.9366 Density 2.2063 1.1032 0.72 0.5827 Error(a) 3.0815 1.5407 Fertilizer 1.6173 0.5391 0.90 0.4783 Density:Fertilizer 1.2491 0.2082 0.35 0.8944 Error(b) 5.3924 0.5992 Total 23 13.5590 Summary Statistics CV(a)% CV(b)% Mean.Weight.of.fruit Mean 13.54 8.45 9.16 Table of Means Fertilizer F1 F2 F3 F4 Density A 9.5350 8.8820 9.0860 8.6980 B 8.9640 9.3525 8.8535 8.2825 C 9.6290 9.3770 10.1040 9.2065 ================================================================== ANALYSIS FOR RESPONSE VARIABLE: Mean.Number.of.fruiting.seeds ================================================================== Summary Information FACTOR NO OF LEVELS LEVELS Density A, B, C Fertilizer F1, F2, F3, F4 Rep 1, Number of Observations Read and Used: 24 ANOVA TABLE Response Variable: Mean.Number.of.fruiting.seeds Source DF Sum of Square Mean Square F Value Pr(> F) Rep 0.0067 0.0067 0.07 0.8139 Density 0.1658 0.0829 0.89 0.5284 Error(a) 0.1858 0.0929 92 Fertilizer 0.2150 0.0717 0.95 0.4559 Density:Fertilizer 0.4275 0.0713 0.95 0.5082 Error(b) 0.6775 0.0753 Total 23 1.6783 Summary Statistics -CV(a)% CV(b)% Mean.Number.of.fruiting.seeds Mean -4.33 3.90 7.04 -Table of Means Fertilizer F1 F2 F3 F4 Density A 7.00 6.85 6.70 7.15 B 6.80 7.30 7.10 7.25 C 6.95 7.25 7.15 7.00 10 Đặc điểm hình thái BH2 Statistical Tool for Agricultural Research (STAR) Thu Feb 25 15:12:10 2021 Analysis of Variance Split Plot in Randomized Complete Block Design ========================================================= ANALYSIS FOR RESPONSE VARIABLE: Mean.Length.of.fruit ========================================================= Summary Information FACTOR NO OF LEVELS LEVELS Density A, B, C Fertilizer F1, F2, F3, F4 Rep 1, Number of Observations Read and Used: 24 ANOVA TABLE Response Variable: Mean.Length.of.fruit Source DF Sum of Square Mean Square F Value Pr(> F) Rep 1.7550 1.7550 1.38 0.3607 Density 3.6947 1.8473 1.46 0.4073 Error(a) 2.5390 1.2695 Fertilizer 0.8193 0.2731 0.48 0.7022 Density:Fertilizer 1.4370 0.2395 0.42 0.8460 Error(b) 5.0886 0.5654 Total 23 15.3336 Summary Statistics CV(a)% CV(b)% Mean.Length.of.fruit Mean 6.93 4.62 16.27 Table of Means Fertilizer F1 F2 F3 F4 Density A 15.980 15.825 15.320 15.725 B 16.690 16.335 16.695 16.575 C 16.495 17.125 15.860 16.570 93 ======================================================== ANALYSIS FOR RESPONSE VARIABLE: Mean.Width.of.fruit ======================================================== Summary Information FACTOR NO OF LEVELS LEVELS Density A, B, C Fertilizer F1, F2, F3, F4 Rep 1, Number of Observations Read and Used: 24 ANOVA TABLE Response Variable: Mean.Width.of.fruit Source DF Sum of Square Mean Square F Value Pr(> F) Rep 0.0000 0.0000 0.02 0.8907 Density 0.0029 0.0015 1.47 0.4050 Error(a) 0.0020 0.0010 Fertilizer 0.0028 0.0009 0.99 0.4418 Density:Fertilizer 0.0052 0.0009 0.93 0.5191 Error(b) 0.0085 0.0009 Total 23 0.0214 Summary Statistics -CV(a)% CV(b)% Mean.Width.of.fruit Mean -2.64 2.57 1.19 -Table of Means Fertilizer F1 F2 F3 F4 Density A 1.1750 1.1725 1.1650 1.2175 B 1.1550 1.2050 1.1950 1.2075 C 1.2200 1.2200 1.1930 1.2025 =========================================================== ANALYSIS FOR RESPONSE VARIABLE: Mean.Diameter.of.fruit =========================================================== Summary Information FACTOR NO OF LEVELS LEVELS Density A, B, C Fertilizer F1, F2, F3, F4 Rep 1, Number of Observations Read and Used: 24 ANOVA TABLE Response Variable: Mean.Diameter.of.fruit Source DF Sum of Square Mean Square F Value Pr(> F) Rep 0.0002 0.0002 0.20 0.6959 Density 0.0013 0.0007 0.60 0.6234 Error(a) 0.0022 0.0011 Fertilizer 0.0035 0.0012 0.50 0.6926 94 Density:Fertilizer 0.0091 0.0015 0.65 0.6906 Error(b) 0.0210 0.0023 Total 23 0.0373 Summary Statistics CV(a)% CV(b)% Mean.Diameter.of.fruit Mean 3.89 5.69 0.8493 Table of Means Fertilizer F1 F2 F3 F4 Density A 0.8375 0.8525 0.8000 0.8750 B 0.8525 0.8350 0.8765 0.8725 C 0.8650 0.8725 0.8125 0.8400 ========================================================= ANALYSIS FOR RESPONSE VARIABLE: Mean.Weight.of.fruit ========================================================= Summary Information FACTOR NO OF LEVELS LEVELS Density A, B, C Fertilizer F1, F2, F3, F4 Rep 1, Number of Observations Read and Used: 24 ANOVA TABLE Response Variable: Mean.Weight.of.fruit Source DF Sum of Square Mean Square F Value Pr(> F) Rep 428.0602 428.0602 0.91 0.4410 Density 964.9937 482.4968 1.02 0.4940 Error(a) 942.0028 471.0014 Fertilizer 1437.9963 479.3321 1.04 0.4197 Density:Fertilizer 2754.9576 459.1596 1.00 0.4805 Error(b) 4138.0056 459.7784 Total 23 10666.0160 Summary Statistics CV(a)% CV(b)% Mean.Weight.of.fruit Mean 152.04 150.22 14.27 Table of Means Fertilizer F1 F2 F3 F4 Density A 9.4535 9.0020 8.4350 9.7260 B 9.7625 9.7505 10.4810 62.8460 C 10.6715 10.8045 9.8915 10.4660 ================================================================== ANALYSIS FOR RESPONSE VARIABLE: Mean.Number.of.fruiting.seeds 95 ================================================================== Summary Information FACTOR NO OF LEVELS LEVELS Density A, B, C Fertilizer F1, F2, F3, F4 Rep 1, Number of Observations Read and Used: 24 ANOVA TABLE Response Variable: Mean.Number.of.fruiting.seeds Source DF Sum of Square Mean Square F Value Pr(> F) Rep 0.0600 0.0600 0.25 0.6667 Density 0.7900 0.3950 1.65 0.3780 Error(a) 0.4800 0.2400 Fertilizer 0.2233 0.0744 0.64 0.6092 Density:Fertilizer 0.4767 0.0794 0.68 0.6702 Error(b) 1.0500 0.1167 Total 23 3.0800 Summary Statistics -CV(a)% CV(b)% Mean.Number.of.fruiting.seeds Mean -6.76 4.71 7.25 -Table of Means Fertilizer F1 F2 F3 F4 Density A 7.15 6.90 6.70 7.25 B 7.20 7.10 7.45 7.55 C 7.45 7.55 7.30 7.40 11 Thời gian sinh trưởng BH1 Statistical Tool for Agricultural Research (STAR) Fri Feb 26 08:40:58 2021 Analysis of Variance Split Plot in Randomized Complete Block Design ============================================================= ANALYSIS FOR RESPONSE VARIABLE: Mean.Date.of.germination ============================================================= Summary Information FACTOR NO OF LEVELS LEVELS Density A, B, C Fertilizer F1, F2, F3, F4 Rep 1, Number of Observations Read and Used: 24 ANOVA TABLE Response Variable: Mean.Date.of.germination Source DF Sum of Square Mean Square F Value Pr(> F) Rep 0.0004 0.0004 0.25 0.6667 Density 0.0033 0.0017 1.00 0.5000 96 Error(a) 0.0033 0.0017 Fertilizer 0.0046 0.0015 0.44 0.7300 Density:Fertilizer 0.0267 0.0044 1.28 0.3546 Error(b) 0.0313 0.0035 Total 23 0.0696 Summary Statistics CV(a)% CV(b)% Mean.Date.of.germination Mean 0.9485 1.37 4.30 Table of Means Fertilizer F1 F2 F3 F4 Density A 4.30 4.30 4.30 4.35 B 4.35 4.30 4.35 4.25 C 4.30 4.35 4.25 4.25 =========================================================== ANALYSIS FOR RESPONSE VARIABLE: Mean.Date.of.flowering =========================================================== Summary Information FACTOR NO OF LEVELS LEVELS Density A, B, C Fertilizer F1, F2, F3, F4 Rep 1, Number of Observations Read and Used: 24 ANOVA TABLE Response Variable: Mean.Date.of.flowering Source DF Sum of Square Mean Square F Value Pr(> F) Rep 0.0600 0.0600 5.33 0.1472 Density 0.3775 0.1887 16.78 0.0562 Error(a) 0.0225 0.0112 Fertilizer 0.1233 0.0411 0.48 0.7068 Density:Fertilizer 0.3392 0.0565 0.65 0.6880 Error(b) 0.7775 0.0864 Total 23 1.7000 Summary Statistics CV(a)% CV(b)% Mean.Date.of.flowering Mean 0.3530 0.9781 30.05 Table of Means Fertilizer F1 F2 F3 F4 Density A 29.95 30.20 30.30 30.20 B 30.15 29.95 30.35 30.00 C 30.00 29.70 29.80 30.00 97 ========================================================= ANALYSIS FOR RESPONSE VARIABLE: Mean.Date.of.harvest ========================================================= Summary Information FACTOR NO OF LEVELS LEVELS Density A, B, C Fertilizer F1, F2, F3, F4 Rep 1, Number of Observations Read and Used: 24 ANOVA TABLE Response Variable: Mean.Date.of.harvest Source DF Sum of Square Mean Square F Value Pr(> F) Rep 0.0704 0.0704 0.56 0.5318 Density 0.1525 0.0763 0.61 0.6219 Error(a) 0.2508 0.1254 Fertilizer 0.0246 0.0082 0.19 0.8991 Density:Fertilizer 0.0542 0.0090 0.21 0.9638 Error(b) 0.3837 0.0426 Total 23 0.9362 Summary Statistics CV(a)% CV(b)% Mean.Date.of.harvest Mean 1.02 0.5923 34.86 Table of Means Fertilizer F1 F2 F3 F4 Density A 34.80 34.80 34.85 34.80 B 34.75 34.80 34.80 34.85 C 35.00 34.95 34.85 35.10 12 Thời gian sinh trưởng BH2 Statistical Tool for Agricultural Research (STAR) Fri Feb 26 09:02:49 2021 Analysis of Variance Split Plot in Randomized Complete Block Design ============================================================= ANALYSIS FOR RESPONSE VARIABLE: Mean.Date.of.germination ============================================================= Summary Information FACTOR NO OF LEVELS LEVELS Density A, B, C Fertilizer F1, F2, F3, F4 Rep 1, Number of Observations Read and Used: 24 ANOVA TABLE Response Variable: Mean.Date.of.germination Source DF Sum of Square Mean Square F Value Pr(> F) - 98 Rep 0.0067 0.0067 0.09 0.7943 Density 0.2058 0.1029 1.36 0.4229 Error(a) 0.1508 0.0754 Fertilizer 0.0233 0.0078 0.23 0.8723 Density:Fertilizer 0.3042 0.0507 1.51 0.2779 Error(b) 0.3025 0.0336 Total 23 0.9933 Summary Statistics CV(a)% CV(b)% Mean.Date.of.germination Mean 1.12 0.7458 24.58 Table of Means Fertilizer F1 F2 F3 F4 Density A 24.60 24.45 24.40 24.40 B 24.40 24.80 24.80 24.75 C 24.65 24.50 24.70 24.55 =========================================================== ANALYSIS FOR RESPONSE VARIABLE: Mean.Date.of.flowering =========================================================== Summary Information FACTOR NO OF LEVELS LEVELS Density A, B, C Fertilizer F1, F2, F3, F4 Rep 1, Number of Observations Read and Used: 24 ANOVA TABLE Response Variable: Mean.Date.of.flowering Source DF Sum of Square Mean Square F Value Pr(> F) Rep 0.0038 0.0038 0.08 0.8026 Density 0.1825 0.0913 1.97 0.3364 Error(a) 0.0925 0.0462 Fertilizer 0.0212 0.0071 0.46 0.7173 Density:Fertilizer 0.2675 0.0446 2.89 0.0742 Error(b) 0.1388 0.0154 Total 23 0.7063 Summary Statistics CV(a)% CV(b)% Mean.Date.of.flowering Mean 0.7190 0.4151 29.91 Table of Means Fertilizer F1 F2 F3 F4 Density A 29.95 29.80 29.75 29.70 B 29.75 30.15 30.10 30.05 C 29.95 29.85 30.00 29.90 ========================================================= 99 ANALYSIS FOR RESPONSE VARIABLE: Mean.Date.of.harvest ========================================================= Summary Information FACTOR NO OF LEVELS LEVELS Density A, B, C Fertilizer F1, F2, F3, F4 Rep 1, Number of Observations Read and Used: 24 ANOVA TABLE Response Variable: Mean.Date.of.harvest Source DF Sum of Square Mean Square F Value Pr(> F) Rep 0.0004 0.0004 0.01 0.9401 Density 0.5358 0.2679 4.63 0.1777 Error(a) 0.1158 0.0579 Fertilizer 0.1079 0.0360 0.69 0.5803 Density:Fertilizer 0.1208 0.0201 0.39 0.8700 Error(b) 0.4688 0.0521 Total 23 1.3496 Summary Statistics CV(a)% CV(b)% Mean.Date.of.harvest Mean 0.6916 0.6559 34.80 Table of Means Fertilizer F1 F2 F3 F4 Density A 34.65 34.80 34.40 34.55 B 34.95 35.00 34.90 35.00 C 34.70 34.90 34.85 34.85 13 Yếu tố cấu thành suất BH1 Statistical Tool for Agricultural Research (STAR) Thu Mar 04 23:45:04 2021 of Variance Strip Plot Design =================================================================== ANALYSIS FOR RESPONSE VARIABLE: Mean.Number.of.fruit.per.plant =================================================================== Summary Information FACTOR NO OF LEVELS LEVELS Density A, B, C Fertilizer F1, F2, F3, F4 Rep 1, Number of Observations Read and Used: 24 ANOVA TABLE Response Variable: Mean.Number.of.fruit.per.plant Source DF Sum of Square Mean Square F Value Pr(> F) Rep 0.9600 0.9600 0.03 0.8746 100 Density 0.1300 0.0650 0.00 0.9978 Error(a) 60.0700 30.0350 Fertilizer 54.1200 18.0400 2.35 0.2505 Error(b) 23.0267 7.6756 Density:Fertilizer 5.6600 0.9433 0.31 0.9102 Error(c) 18.2733 3.0456 Total 23 162.2400 -Summary Statistics -CV(a)% CV(b)% CV(c)% Mean.Number.of.fruit.per.plant Mean -16.41 8.29 5.23 33.40 -Table of Means Fertilizer F1 F2 F3 F4 Density A 33.75 33.75 31.10 34.90 B 33.50 34.25 30.20 36.05 C 33.25 34.00 31.70 34.35 ========================================================= ANALYSIS FOR RESPONSE VARIABLE: Mean.Weight.of.fruit ========================================================= Summary Information FACTOR NO OF LEVELS LEVELS Density A, B, C Fertilizer F1, F2, F3, F4 Rep 1, Number of Observations Read and Used: 24 ANOVA TABLE Response Variable: Mean.Weight.of.fruit Source DF Sum of Square Mean Square F Value Pr(> F) Rep 0.9048 0.9048 1.07 0.4096 Density 0.0970 0.0485 0.06 0.9457 Error(a) 1.6907 0.8453 Fertilizer 1.5204 0.5068 4.06 0.1399 Error(b) 0.3744 0.1248 Density:Fertilizer 0.3156 0.0526 0.75 0.6346 Error(c) 0.4233 0.0705 Total 23 5.3262 Summary Statistics -CV(a)% CV(b)% CV(c)% Mean.Weight.of.fruit Mean -11.77 4.52 3.40 7.81 -Table of Means Fertilizer F1 F2 F3 F4 Density A 7.9520 7.6130 7.9130 7.9655 B 7.7965 7.2775 7.8560 7.9665 C 8.2390 7.2490 8.0495 7.8905 101 ========================================================== ANALYSIS FOR RESPONSE VARIABLE: Mean.Individual.yield ========================================================== Summary Information FACTOR NO OF LEVELS LEVELS Density A, B, C Fertilizer F1, F2, F3, F4 Rep 1, Number of Observations Read and Used: 24 ANOVA TABLE Response Variable: Mean.Individual.yield Source DF Sum of Square Mean Square F Value Pr(> F) Rep 591.2889 591.2889 0.15 0.7325 Density 217.7698 108.8849 0.03 0.9724 Error(a) 7673.2367 3836.6184 Fertilizer 4064.3938 1354.7979 2.48 0.2379 Error(b) 1640.3798 546.7933 Density:Fertilizer 1178.6025 196.4338 0.55 0.7579 Error(c) 2146.5860 357.7643 Total 23 17512.2576 Summary Statistics CV(a)% CV(b)% CV(c)% Mean.Individual.yield Mean 23.64 8.93 7.22 261.96 Table of Means Fertilizer F1 F2 F3 F4 Density A 270.2740 258.2712 248.4249 278.9552 B 260.7192 249.2552 234.6955 286.1549 C 280.3396 245.9060 259.5326 271.0425 14 Yếu tố cấu thành suất BH2 Statistical Tool for Agricultural Research (STAR) Thu Mar 04 23:28:46 2021 Analysis of Variance Split Plot in Randomized Complete Block Design =================================================================== ANALYSIS FOR RESPONSE VARIABLE: Mean.Number.of.fruit.per.plant =================================================================== Summary Information FACTOR NO OF LEVELS LEVELS Density A, B, C Fertilizer F1, F2, F3, F4 Rep 1, Number of Observations Read and Used: 24 ANOVA TABLE Response Variable: Mean.Number.of.fruit.per.plant Source DF Sum of Square Mean Square F Value Pr(> F) 102 Rep 4.4204 4.4204 0.14 0.7481 Density 32.8300 16.4150 0.50 0.6653 Error(a) 65.2433 32.6217 Fertilizer 7.6879 2.5626 0.49 0.6990 Density:Fertilizer 2.8433 0.4739 0.09 0.9958 Error(b) 47.2413 5.2490 Total 23 160.2663 Summary Statistics CV(a)% CV(b)% Mean.Number.of.fruit.per.plant Mean 16.85 6.76 33.89 Table of Means Fertilizer F1 F2 F3 F4 Density A 35.80 34.95 34.80 34.90 B 34.85 34.60 34.60 32.90 C 33.35 31.80 32.65 31.45 ========================================================= ANALYSIS FOR RESPONSE VARIABLE: Mean.Weight.of.fruit ========================================================= Summary Information FACTOR NO OF LEVELS LEVELS Density A, B, C Fertilizer F1, F2, F3, F4 Rep 1, Number of Observations Read and Used: 24 ANOVA TABLE Response Variable: Mean.Weight.of.fruit Source DF Sum of Square Mean Square F Value Pr(> F) Rep 0.0082 0.0082 0.02 0.9064 Density 1.3516 0.6758 1.46 0.4062 Error(a) 0.9246 0.4623 Fertilizer 0.0775 0.0258 0.12 0.9440 Density:Fertilizer 0.4873 0.0812 0.39 0.8693 Error(b) 1.8848 0.2094 Total 23 4.7339 Summary Statistics CV(a)% CV(b)% Mean.Weight.of.fruit Mean 8.18 5.50 8.32 Table of Means Fertilizer F1 F2 F3 F4 Density A 7.9215 8.1465 7.9260 7.9925 B 8.4770 7.9965 8.5520 8.5110 C 8.7480 8.5345 8.4755 8.5045 103 ========================================================== ANALYSIS FOR RESPONSE VARIABLE: Mean.nang.suat.ca.the ========================================================== Summary Information FACTOR NO OF LEVELS LEVELS Density A, B, C Fertilizer F1, F2, F3, F4 Rep 1, Number of Observations Read and Used: 24 ANOVA TABLE Response Variable: Mean.nang.suat.ca.the Source DF Sum of Square Mean Square F Value Pr(> F) Rep 462.0143 462.0143 0.86 0.4513 Density 362.4453 181.2227 0.34 0.7474 Error(a) 1072.4779 536.2390 Fertilizer 703.6807 234.5602 0.45 0.7223 Density:Fertilizer 693.8811 115.6469 0.22 0.9593 Error(b) 4672.5516 519.1724 Total 23 7967.0509 Summary Statistics -CV(a)% CV(b)% Mean.nang.suat.ca.the Mean -8.24 8.10 281.17 -Table of Means Fertilizer F1 F2 F3 F4 Density A 282.4288 284.2678 274.7224 278.8040 B 293.8613 275.2964 295.9304 280.4558 C 292.0310 271.6045 276.8531 267.7681 104