VIETNAM NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE FACULTY OF AGRONOMY UNDERGRADUATE THESIS TITLE: EFFECT OF SOME FOLIAR FERTILIZERS ON THE GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND YIELD OF DT51 SOYBEAN IN WINTER SEASON, 2020 GIA LAM, HA NOI Student : LE LINH CHI Student code : 611757 Class : K61KHCTT Supervisor : PhD NUYEN VAN PHU Department : PLANT PHYSIOLOGY HANOI-2021 DECLARATION I declare that the undergraduate thesis is the result of my research The data and results mentioned in this thesis are honest and not used in any published thesis, dissertations, and scientific research projects previously I hereby commit that the information cited in the thesis ensuring cited as prescribed I bear full responsibility for these reassurances Hanoi, February 24, 2021 Student Le Linh Chi i ACKNOWLEDGEMENT After a long period of studying in the university, the undergraduate thesis is the most important time for me to improve and have more knowledge to research the reality with teachers and staff in the Faculty of Agronomy, especially teachers in the Plant Physiology Department During the internship and undergraduate thesis, not only my efforts but also I received a lot of help from teachers, family and friends First of all, I would like to express my deep gratitude to PhD Nguyen Van Phu who dedicated guidance and helped me during the study process and complete thesis Specially thanks to the Dean Of Faculty and all the teachers in the Faculty of Agronomy, especially the teachers in Plant Physiology who helped me complete this undergraduate thesis I would also like to thank the staff of the Department of Plant Physiology for helping, sharing valuable experiences as well as creating the best conditions for me to this undergraduate thesis Finally, I would like to thank my family and friends who are always there to care for and encourage me throughout the undergraduate thesis process Sincerely! Hanoi, February 24, 2021 Student Le Linh Chi ii ABSTRACT Research on the effects of some foliar fertilizers on the growth, development and yield of soybeans in winter season 2020, Gia Lam, Ha Noi Since then, contributing to the selection, creation and construction of cultivation methods to determine the most effective foliar fertilizers for high yield and high quality soybean of varieties soybean in Vietnam The pot experiment was carried from September 2020 to January 2021 at the Faculty of Agronomy, Vietnam National University of Agriculture, Trau Quy commune, Gia Lam district, Hanoi The experiment was arranged is arranged in the randomized complete block (RCB) repeat time times Five treatments included T1 (H2O), T2 (Dau Trau 501), T3 (Grow More 30-1010+TE), T4 (Profarm- n29) and T5 (Seaweed 95%) Monitoring criterias: height, number of leaves, number of flowers, leaf area, leaf area index Using Excel software and IRISSTAT 5.0 biological statistical software to process data The results showed that foliar fertilizer has good effects on criterias of growth and development of DT51 soybean in which T5: Seaweed 95% helped the plant to grow best, reached the highest of yield 19.64 quintals/ha and got the highest net profit 91.75 million VND/ha Meanwhile, no significant difference in the growth, development and yield among foliar fertilizers iii CONTENTS DECLARATION i ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ii ABSTRACT iii CONTENTS iv LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS vii LIST OF TABLES viii LIST OF FIGURES ix PART INTRODUCTION 1.1 Introduction section 1.2 Research objective and requirement 1.2.1 Objective 1.2.2 Requirement PART LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1 Valuations of soybean 2.1.1 Economic value of soybean 2.1.2 Agricultural value of soybean 2.2 Soybean production in the world and Vietnam 2.2.2 Soybean production in Vietnam 2.3 Function and requirement of some basic mineral nutrients elements for soybean 2.3.1 Role of Nitrogen 2.3.2 Role of Phosphorus 10 2.3.3 Role of Potassium 10 2.3.4 Role of Magnesium 11 2.3.5 Role of Iron 11 iv 2.3.6 Role of Manganese 11 2.3.7 Role of Copper 12 2.3.8 Role of Bo 12 2.4 Mechanic of uptake foliar nutrition and advantages, disadvantages of foliar application 12 2.4.1 Mechanic of uptake foliar nutrition 12 2.4.2 Advantages and disadvantages of foliar application 14 2.5 Research of foliar application for crops, soybean in the world and Vietnam 15 2.5.1 Some results of foliar application in the world 15 2.5.2 Some results of foliar application in Vietnam 17 PART RESEARCH CONTENT AND METHOD 20 3.1 Materials of research 20 3.2 Location and time research 21 3.3 Research content 21 3.4 Method of research 21 3.4.1 Experimental design 21 3.4.2 Map of experiment 22 3.4.3 Cultivation techniques 22 3.5 Tracking and method criteria 23 3.5.1 Growth criteria 23 3.5.2 Physiological criteria 23 3.5.3 Yield criteria 24 3.5.4 Processing data 25 PART RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 26 4.1 Effect of foliar fertilizers on plant height of DT51 soybean 26 4.2 Effect of foliar fertilizers on number of leaves of DT51 soybean 29 4.3 Effect of foliar fertilizers on branching ability of DT51 soybean 31 v 4.4 Effect of foliar fertilizers on leaf area and leaf area index of DT51 soybean 33 4.5 Effect of foliar fertilizers on nodule formation of DT51 soybean 35 4.6 Effect of foliar fertilizers on dry matter of DT51 soybean 37 4.7 Effect of foliar fertilizers on flower formation of DT51 soybean 39 4.8 Effect of foliar fertilizers on SPAD index of DT51 soybean 41 4.9 Effects of foliar fertilizers on yield components of DT51 soybean 42 4.10 Effect of foliar fertilizers on yield of DT51 soybean 45 4.11 Economic efficiency when using foliar fertilizer for DT51soybean in Gia Lam-Hanoi, winter season 2020 47 PART 5: CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION 49 5.1 Conclusion 49 5.2 Recommendation 49 PART 6: REFERENCE 50 APPENDIX 1: ECONOMIC ACCOUNTING 52 APPENDIX 2: SOME PICTURES OF THE RESEARCH 55 APPENDIX 3: RESULTS OF DATA PROCESSING WITH IRRISTAT SOFTWARE 59 vi LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS Acronyms English meaning CV% Coefficient of variation DAS Day after sowing Et al And others FAO The Food and Agriculture Organization IRRISTAT Agricultural statistical software LA Leaf area LAI Leaf area index LSD Least significant different No Number RCB The randomized complete block T Treatment vii LIST OF TABLES Table 2.2.1a Soybean production in the world 2010-2019 Table 2.2.1b Soybean production of some countries 2017 - 2019 Table 2.2.2 Soy bean production in Vietnam from 2009–2019 Table Effects of foliar fertilizers on plant height of DT51 soybean 27 Table Effects of foliar fertilizers on number of leaves of DT51 soybean 29 Table 4.3 Effect of foliar fertilizers on branching ability of DT51 soybean 31 Table 4.4 Effects of foliar fertilizers on leaf area and soybean leaf area index of DT51 soybean 33 Table 4.5 Effect of foliar fertilizers on nodule formation of DT51 soybean 36 Table 4.6 Effect of foliar fertilizers on dry matter of DT51 soybean 38 Table 4.7 Effect of foliar fertilizers on number of flowers and flowering time of DT51 soybean 40 Table 4.8 Effect of foliar fertilizers on SPAD index of DT51 soybean 41 Table Effects of foliar fertilizers on yield constituent factors of DT51 soybean 42 Table 4.10 Effect of foliar fertilizers on yield of DT51 soybean 45 Table 4.11 Economic efficiency when using foliar fertilizer for DT51soybean 47 viii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 4.1 Growing dynamic of plant height of DT51 soybean 28 Figure 4.2 Growing dynamic of leaf number of DT51 soybean 30 Figure 4.3 Growing dynamic of number of branches 32 Figure 4.10 Effect of foliar fertilizers on theoretical yield and actual yield of DT51 soybean 46 ix VARIATE V007 53DAS LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN F RATIO PROB ER SQUARES SQUARES LN ============================================================================= REP 3.42933 1.71467 1.21 0.348 T 12.7627 3.19067 2.26 0.152 * RESIDUAL 11.3173 1.41467 * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 14 27.5093 1.96495 TABLE OF MEANS FOR FACTORIAL EFFECTS FILE NUMLEAF 23/ 2/21 1:11 :PAGE Effect of foliar fertilization on number of leaves of DT51 soybean MEANS FOR EFFECT REP REP SE(N= 5%LSD NOS 5 5) 8DF REP NOS 5 25DAS 3.68000 3.44000 3.32000 32DAS 7.56000 7.52000 7.36000 39DAS 13.0800 15.2800 14.9200 46DAS 23.3600 26.4400 26.5600 0.149220 0.486592 0.307463 1.00260 0.584694 1.90663 0.822273 2.68135 53DAS 34.4000 35.1200 35.5600 SE(N= 5) 0.531915 5%LSD 8DF 1.73452 MEANS FOR EFFECT T T SE(N= 5%LSD NOS 3 3 3) 8DF T NOS 3 3 25DAS 3.46667 3.46667 3.53333 3.53333 3.40000 32DAS 7.26667 7.40000 7.80000 7.53333 7.40000 39DAS 13.3333 14.6000 14.3333 14.8667 15.0000 46DAS 22.6667 24.9333 26.5333 26.3333 26.8000 0.192642 0.628187 0.396933 1.29436 0.754836 2.46144 1.06155 3.46161 53DAS 33.5333 35.8667 35.2667 34.4667 36.0000 SE(N= 3) 0.686699 5%LSD 8DF 2.23926 ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE SUMMARY TABLE FILE NUMLEAF 23/ 2/21 1:11 :PAGE Effect of foliar fertilization on number of leaves of DT51 soybean F-PROBABLIITY VALUES FOR EACH EFFECT IN THE MODEL SECTION - VARIATE 25DAS 32DAS 39DAS 46DAS GRAND MEAN (N= 15) NO OBS 15 3.4800 15 7.4800 15 14.427 15 25.453 STANDARD DEVIATION C OF V |REP SD/MEAN | BASED ON BASED ON % | TOTAL SS RESID SS | 0.30048 0.33367 9.6 0.2780 0.55959 0.68751 9.2 0.8894 1.5323 1.3074 9.1 0.0598 2.6093 1.8387 7.2 0.0412 |T | | | 0.9823 0.8951 0.5749 0.1149 | | | | 62 53DAS 15 35.027 1.4018 1.1894 3.4 0.3479 0.1519 Effect of foliar fertilizers on branching ability of DT51 soybean BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE 25DAS FILE BRANCH 23/ 2/21 2:52 :PAGE Effect of foliar fertilization on branching ability VARIATE V003 25DAS LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN F RATIO PROB ER SQUARES SQUARES LN ============================================================================= REP 156333 781667E-01 52.11 0.000 T 900000E-01 225000E-01 15.00 0.001 * RESIDUAL 120000E-01 150000E-02 * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 14 258333 184524E-01 BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE 32DAS FILE BRANCH 23/ 2/21 2:52 :PAGE Effect of foliar fertilization on branching ability VARIATE V004 32DAS LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN F RATIO PROB ER SQUARES SQUARES LN ============================================================================= REP 518698E-16 259349E-16 0.00 1.000 T 106667E-01 266666E-02 0.16 0.951 * RESIDUAL 133333 166667E-01 * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 14 144000 102857E-01 BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE 39DAS FILE BRANCH 23/ 2/21 2:52 :PAGE Effect of foliar fertilization on branching ability VARIATE V005 39DAS LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN F RATIO PROB ER SQUARES SQUARES LN ============================================================================= REP 693333E-01 346666E-01 0.84 0.470 T 549333 137333 3.32 0.070 * RESIDUAL 330667 413333E-01 * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 14 949333 678095E-01 TABLE OF MEANS FOR FACTORIAL EFFECTS FILE BRANCH 23/ 2/21 2:52 :PAGE Effect of foliar fertilization on branching ability MEANS FOR EFFECT REP REP NOS 5 25DAS 0.440000 0.640000 0.670000 32DAS 1.68000 1.68000 1.68000 39DAS 2.20000 2.08000 2.24000 SE(N= 5) 0.173205E-01 0.577350E-01 0.909212E-01 5%LSD 8DF 0.564805E-01 0.188268 0.296485 MEANS FOR EFFECT T T NOS 3 25DAS 0.583333 0.533333 0.533333 32DAS 1.66667 1.66667 1.66667 39DAS 1.93333 2.06667 2.06667 63 3 0.733333 0.533333 1.73333 1.66667 2.40000 2.40000 SE(N= 3) 0.223607E-01 0.745356E-01 0.117379 5%LSD 8DF 0.729160E-01 0.243053 0.382760 ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE SUMMARY TABLE FILE BRANCH 23/ 2/21 2:52 :PAGE Effect of foliar fertilization on branching ability F-PROBABLIITY VALUES FOR EACH EFFECT IN THE MODEL SECTION - VARIATE 25DAS 32DAS 39DAS GRAND MEAN (N= 15) NO OBS 15 0.58333 15 1.6800 15 2.1733 STANDARD DEVIATION C OF V |REP SD/MEAN | BASED ON BASED ON % | TOTAL SS RESID SS | 0.13584 0.38730E-01 6.6 0.0001 0.10142 0.12910 7.7 1.0000 0.26040 0.20331 9.4 0.4697 |T | | | 0.0011 0.9506 0.0698 | | | | Effect of foliar fertilizers on leaf area and leaf area index of DT51 soybean BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE LAN1 FILE LA 23/ 2/21 3:57 :PAGE Effects of foliar fertilization on leaf area VARIATE V003 LAN1 LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN F RATIO PROB ER SQUARES SQUARES LN ============================================================================= REP 481693 240847 1.49 0.281 T 611093 152773 0.95 0.485 * RESIDUAL 1.28911 161138 * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 14 2.38189 170135 BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE LAN2 FILE LA 23/ 2/21 3:57 :PAGE Effects of foliar fertilization on leaf area VARIATE V004 LAN2 LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN F RATIO PROB ER SQUARES SQUARES LN ============================================================================= REP 393773 196887 1.37 0.309 T 3.81623 954057 6.62 0.012 * RESIDUAL 1.15369 144212 * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 14 5.36369 383121 BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE LAN3 FILE LA 23/ 2/21 3:57 :PAGE Effects of foliar fertilization on leaf area VARIATE V005 LAN3 LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN F RATIO PROB ER SQUARES SQUARES LN ============================================================================= REP 833199E-01 416600E-01 0.09 0.913 T 7.28557 1.82139 4.02 0.045 * RESIDUAL 3.62495 453118 * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 14 10.9938 785274 TABLE OF MEANS FOR FACTORIAL EFFECTS FILE LA 23/ 2/21 3:57 :PAGE 64 Effects of foliar fertilization on leaf area MEANS FOR EFFECT REP REP NOS 5 LAN1 4.38400 4.41800 4.78000 LAN2 4.88200 5.18400 5.25600 LAN3 7.50000 7.37000 7.54600 SE(N= 5) 0.179521 0.169830 0.301038 5%LSD 8DF 0.585399 0.553800 0.981653 MEANS FOR EFFECT T T NOS 3 3 LAN1 4.30333 4.65667 4.85667 4.39000 4.43000 LAN2 4.35667 5.21333 4.93000 5.11333 5.92333 LAN3 6.14333 7.73667 7.45000 7.97667 8.05333 SE(N= 3) 0.231760 0.219250 0.388638 5%LSD 8DF 0.755747 0.714952 1.26731 ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE SUMMARY TABLE FILE LA 23/ 2/21 3:57 :PAGE Effects of foliar fertilization on leaf area F-PROBABLIITY VALUES FOR EACH EFFECT IN THE MODEL SECTION - VARIATE LAN1 LAN2 LAN3 GRAND MEAN (N= 15) NO OBS 15 4.5273 15 5.1073 15 7.4720 STANDARD DEVIATION C OF V |REP SD/MEAN | BASED ON BASED ON % | TOTAL SS RESID SS | 0.41247 0.40142 8.9 0.2809 0.61897 0.37975 7.4 0.3094 0.88616 0.67314 9.0 0.9126 |T | | | 0.4852 0.0123 0.0450 | | | | BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE LAN1 FILE LAI 23/ 2/21 4: :PAGE Effects of foliar fertilization on leaf area index VARIATE V003 LAN1 LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN F RATIO PROB ER SQUARES SQUARES LN ============================================================================= REP 756400E-01 378200E-01 1.46 0.288 T 968666E-01 242167E-01 0.94 0.491 * RESIDUAL 206893 258617E-01 * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 14 379400 271000E-01 BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE LAN2 FILE LAI 23/ 2/21 4: :PAGE Effects of foliar fertilization on leaf area index VARIATE V004 LAN2 LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN F RATIO PROB ER SQUARES SQUARES LN ============================================================================= REP 642533E-01 321267E-01 1.42 0.296 T 609667 152417 6.75 0.012 * RESIDUAL 180613 225767E-01 - 65 * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 14 854533 610381E-01 BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE LAN3 FILE LAI 23/ 2/21 4: :PAGE Effects of foliar fertilization on leaf area index VARIATE V005 LAN3 LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN F RATIO PROB ER SQUARES SQUARES LN ============================================================================= REP 124133E-01 620666E-02 0.09 0.918 T 1.15836 289590 4.00 0.045 * RESIDUAL 578720 723400E-01 * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 14 1.74949 124964 TABLE OF MEANS FOR FACTORIAL EFFECTS FILE LAI 23/ 2/21 4: :PAGE Effects of foliar fertilization on leaf area index MEANS FOR EFFECT REP REP NOS 5 LAN1 1.75200 1.76800 1.91000 LAN2 1.95200 2.07600 2.10200 LAN3 3.00000 2.95000 3.01800 SE(N= 5) 0.719189E-01 0.671962E-01 0.120283 5%LSD 8DF 0.234520 0.219120 0.392231 MEANS FOR EFFECT T T NOS 3 3 LAN1 1.72000 1.86333 1.94000 1.75667 1.77000 LAN2 1.74333 2.08333 1.97333 2.04667 2.37000 LAN3 2.46000 3.09333 2.98000 3.19000 3.22333 SE(N= 3) 0.928469E-01 0.867500E-01 0.155285 5%LSD 8DF 0.302764 0.282883 0.506368 ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE SUMMARY TABLE FILE LAI 23/ 2/21 4: :PAGE Effects of foliar fertilization on leaf area index F-PROBABLIITY VALUES FOR EACH EFFECT IN THE MODEL SECTION - VARIATE LAN1 LAN2 LAN3 GRAND MEAN (N= 15) NO OBS 15 1.8100 15 2.0433 15 2.9893 STANDARD DEVIATION C OF V |REP SD/MEAN | BASED ON BASED ON % | TOTAL SS RESID SS | 0.16462 0.16082 8.9 0.2877 0.24706 0.15026 7.4 0.2963 0.35350 0.26896 9.0 0.9181 |T | | | 0.4907 0.0116 0.0454 | | | | Effect of foliar fertilizers on nodule formation of DT51 soybean BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE LAN1 FILE NODULE 21/ 2/21 22:36 :PAGE Effect of foliar fertilization on the number of nodules of DT51 soybean VARIATE V003 LAN1 LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN F RATIO PROB ER 66 SQUARES SQUARES LN ============================================================================= REP 4.92137 2.46069 1.10 0.379 T 155.099 38.7746 17.40 0.001 * RESIDUAL 17.8224 2.22780 * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 14 177.842 12.7030 BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE LAN2 FILE NODULE 21/ 2/21 22:36 :PAGE Effect of foliar fertilization on the number of nodules of DT51 soybean VARIATE V004 LAN2 LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN F RATIO PROB ER SQUARES SQUARES LN ============================================================================= REP 11.7594 5.87971 2.05 0.190 T 94.8488 23.7122 8.27 0.006 * RESIDUAL 22.9318 2.86647 * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 14 129.540 9.25286 BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE LAN3 FILE NODULE 21/ 2/21 22:36 :PAGE Effect of foliar fertilization on the number of nodules of DT51 soybean VARIATE V005 LAN3 LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN F RATIO PROB ER SQUARES SQUARES LN ============================================================================= REP 536013 268007 0.04 0.963 T 251.462 62.8654 9.01 0.005 * RESIDUAL 55.8048 6.97560 * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 14 307.802 21.9859 TABLE OF MEANS FOR FACTORIAL EFFECTS FILE NODULE 21/ 2/21 22:36 :PAGE Effect of foliar fertilization on the number of nodules of DT51 soybean MEANS FOR EFFECT REP REP NOS 5 LAN1 22.4000 21.0020 21.5980 LAN2 22.2680 21.8000 23.8680 LAN3 30.4680 30.4660 30.0660 SE(N= 5) 0.667503 0.757162 1.18115 5%LSD 8DF 2.17666 2.46903 3.85162 MEANS FOR EFFECT T T NOS 3 3 LAN1 17.4433 20.1100 20.2233 24.0000 26.5567 LAN2 18.1100 24.6667 21.8900 25.0033 23.5567 LAN3 24.6667 32.6700 31.5533 26.7767 36.0000 SE(N= 3) 0.861743 0.977492 1.52486 5%LSD 8DF 2.81006 3.18750 4.97241 ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE SUMMARY TABLE FILE NODULE 21/ 2/21 22:36 :PAGE 67 Effect of foliar fertilization on the number of nodules of DT51 soybean F-PROBABLIITY VALUES FOR EACH EFFECT IN THE MODEL SECTION - VARIATE LAN1 LAN2 LAN3 GRAND MEAN (N= 15) NO OBS 15 21.667 15 22.645 15 30.333 STANDARD DEVIATION C OF V |REP SD/MEAN | BASED ON BASED ON % | TOTAL SS RESID SS | 3.5641 1.4926 6.9 0.3785 3.0419 1.6931 7.5 0.1902 4.6889 2.6411 8.7 0.9628 |T | | | 0.0007 0.0065 0.0050 BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE LAN1 FILE MNODU 23/ 2/21 11:13 :PAGE Effect of foliar fertilization on mass nodule | | | | VARIATE V003 LAN1 LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN F RATIO PROB ER SQUARES SQUARES LN ============================================================================= REP 129333E-02 646667E-03 1.40 0.302 T 201333E-01 503333E-02 10.86 0.003 * RESIDUAL 370667E-02 463334E-03 * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 14 251333E-01 179524E-02 BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE LAN2 FILE MNODU 23/ 2/21 11:13 :PAGE Effect of foliar fertilization on mass nodule VARIATE V004 LAN2 LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN F RATIO PROB ER SQUARES SQUARES LN ============================================================================= REP 729333E-02 364667E-02 4.35 0.052 T 347333E-01 868333E-02 10.36 0.003 * RESIDUAL 670667E-02 838334E-03 * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 14 487333E-01 348095E-02 BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE LAN3 FILE MNODU 23/ 2/21 11:13 :PAGE Effect of foliar fertilization on mass nodule VARIATE V005 LAN3 LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN F RATIO PROB ER SQUARES SQUARES LN ============================================================================= REP 169333E-02 846667E-03 0.30 0.754 T 818933E-01 204733E-01 7.15 0.010 * RESIDUAL 229067E-01 286334E-02 * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 14 106493 760667E-02 TABLE OF MEANS FOR FACTORIAL EFFECTS FILE MNODU 23/ 2/21 11:13 :PAGE Effect of foliar fertilization on mass nodule MEANS FOR EFFECT REP REP NOS 5 LAN1 0.236000 0.214000 0.230000 LAN2 0.280000 0.306000 0.334000 LAN3 0.552000 0.566000 0.540000 68 SE(N= 5) 0.962636E-02 0.129486E-01 0.239305E-01 5%LSD 8DF 0.313906E-01 0.422241E-01 0.780348E-01 MEANS FOR EFFECT T T NOS 3 3 LAN1 0.170000 0.240000 0.203333 0.243333 0.276667 LAN2 0.220000 0.316667 0.300000 0.333333 0.363333 LAN3 0.453333 0.616667 0.573333 0.480000 0.640000 SE(N= 3) 0.124276E-01 0.167166E-01 0.308941E-01 5%LSD 8DF 0.405250E-01 0.545111E-01 0.100743 ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE SUMMARY TABLE FILE MNODU 23/ 2/21 11:13 :PAGE Effect of foliar fertilization on mass nodule F-PROBABLIITY VALUES FOR EACH EFFECT IN THE MODEL SECTION - VARIATE LAN1 LAN2 LAN3 GRAND MEAN (N= 15) NO OBS 15 0.22667 15 0.30667 15 0.55267 STANDARD DEVIATION C OF V |REP SD/MEAN | BASED ON BASED ON % | TOTAL SS RESID SS | 0.42370E-010.21525E-01 9.5 0.3024 0.59000E-010.28954E-01 9.4 0.0523 0.87216E-010.53510E-01 9.7 0.7543 |T | | | 0.0029 0.0033 0.0099 | | | | Effect of foliar fertilizers on dry matter of DT51 soybean BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE LAN1 FILE DRY 23/ 2/21 17:48 :PAGE Effect of foliar fertilization on dry matter accumulation of DT51 soybean VARIATE V003 LAN1 LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN F RATIO PROB ER SQUARES SQUARES LN ============================================================================= REP 604933E-01 302467E-01 0.17 0.848 T 2.44529 611323 3.41 0.066 * RESIDUAL 1.43371 179213 * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 14 3.93949 281392 BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE LAN2 FILE DRY 23/ 2/21 17:48 :PAGE Effect of foliar fertilization on dry matter accumulation of DT51 soybean VARIATE V004 LAN2 LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN F RATIO PROB ER SQUARES SQUARES LN ============================================================================= REP 645335E-02 322668E-02 0.03 0.975 T 4.53917 1.13479 9.16 0.005 * RESIDUAL 991147 123893 * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 14 5.53677 395484 BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE LAN3 FILE DRY 23/ 2/21 17:48 :PAGE 69 Effect of foliar fertilization on dry matter accumulation of DT51 soybean VARIATE V005 LAN3 LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN F RATIO PROB ER SQUARES SQUARES LN ============================================================================= REP 186254 931269E-01 0.18 0.842 T 2.22543 556356 1.06 0.438 * RESIDUAL 4.21442 526802 * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 14 6.62609 473292 TABLE OF MEANS FOR FACTORIAL EFFECTS FILE DRY 23/ 2/21 17:48 :PAGE Effect of foliar fertilization on dry matter accumulation of DT51 soybean MEANS FOR EFFECT REP REP NOS 5 LAN1 4.87000 4.96600 4.81200 LAN2 5.73400 5.69000 5.69000 LAN3 7.95800 7.91200 8.16800 SE(N= 5) 0.189322 0.157412 0.324593 5%LSD 8DF 0.617359 0.513306 1.05846 MEANS FOR EFFECT T T NOS 3 3 3 LAN1 4.26000 4.57333 5.35333 5.15667 5.07000 LAN2 4.72000 5.72333 5.83333 5.82667 6.42000 LAN3 7.40333 8.26333 7.82333 8.04000 8.53333 SE(N= 3) 0.244413 0.203219 0.419047 5%LSD 8DF 0.797007 0.662675 1.36647 ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE SUMMARY TABLE FILE DRY 23/ 2/21 17:48 :PAGE Effect of foliar fertilization on dry matter accumulation of DT51 soybean F-PROBABLIITY VALUES FOR EACH EFFECT IN THE MODEL SECTION - VARIATE LAN1 LAN2 LAN3 GRAND MEAN (N= 15) NO OBS 15 4.8827 15 5.7047 15 8.0127 STANDARD DEVIATION C OF V |REP SD/MEAN | BASED ON BASED ON % | TOTAL SS RESID SS | 0.53046 0.42334 8.7 0.8479 0.62888 0.35198 6.2 0.9752 0.68796 0.72581 9.1 0.8416 |T | | | 0.0658 0.0048 0.4376 | | | | Effect of foliar fertilizers on flower formation of DT51 soybean BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE FN FILE NF 23/ 2/21 22:26 :PAGE Effect of foliar fertilization on number of flowers of DT51 soybean VARIATE V003 FN LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN F RATIO PROB ER 70 SQUARES SQUARES LN ============================================================================= REP 6.38400 3.19200 4.24 0.055 T 38.5760 9.64400 12.82 0.002 * RESIDUAL 6.01601 752001 * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 14 50.9760 3.64114 TABLE OF MEANS FOR FACTORIAL EFFECTS FILE NF 23/ 2/21 22:26 :PAGE Effect of foliar fertilization on number of flowers of DT51 soybean MEANS FOR EFFECT REP REP NOS 5 FN 45.8800 47.4400 46.3600 SE(N= 5) 0.387815 5%LSD 8DF 1.26462 MEANS FOR EFFECT T T NOS 3 3 FN 43.4000 47.2667 47.2000 47.0667 47.8667 SE(N= 3) 0.500667 5%LSD 8DF 1.63262 ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE SUMMARY TABLE FILE NF 23/ 2/21 22:26 :PAGE Effect of foliar fertilization on number of flowers of DT51 soybean F-PROBABLIITY VALUES FOR EACH EFFECT IN THE MODEL SECTION - VARIATE FN GRAND MEAN (N= 15) NO OBS 15 46.560 STANDARD DEVIATION C OF V |REP SD/MEAN | BASED ON BASED ON % | TOTAL SS RESID SS | 1.9082 0.86718 1.9 0.0550 |T | | | 0.0017 | | | | Effect of foliar fertilizers on SPAD index of DT51 soybean BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE 32DAD FILE SPAD 23/ 2/21 23:17 :PAGE Effect of foliar fertilization on SPAD index of DT51 soybean VARIATE V003 32DAD LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN F RATIO PROB ER SQUARES SQUARES LN ============================================================================= REP 2.74118 1.37059 0.30 0.753 T 5.54923 1.38731 0.30 0.869 * RESIDUAL 36.8095 4.60119 * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 14 45.0999 3.22142 BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE 39DAD FILE SPAD 23/ 2/21 23:17 :PAGE 71 Effect of foliar fertilization on SPAD index of DT51 soybean VARIATE V004 39DAD LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN F RATIO PROB ER SQUARES SQUARES LN ============================================================================= REP 549172 274586 0.34 0.722 T 117.199 29.2997 36.64 0.000 * RESIDUAL 6.39721 799651 * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 14 124.145 8.86751 BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE 46DAD FILE SPAD 23/ 2/21 23:17 :PAGE Effect of foliar fertilization on SPAD index of DT51 soybean VARIATE V005 46DAD LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN F RATIO PROB ER SQUARES SQUARES LN ============================================================================= REP 4.96133 2.48066 0.82 0.475 T 14.9465 3.73663 1.24 0.367 * RESIDUAL 24.0717 3.00897 * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 14 43.9796 3.14140 TABLE OF MEANS FOR FACTORIAL EFFECTS FILE SPAD 23/ 2/21 23:17 :PAGE Effect of foliar fertilization on SPAD index of DT51 soybean MEANS FOR EFFECT REP REP NOS 5 32DAD 33.5760 32.5320 32.9840 39DAD 38.8600 38.6480 39.1160 46DAD 45.4680 45.6480 44.3480 SE(N= 5) 0.959290 0.399913 0.775753 5%LSD 8DF 3.12815 1.30408 2.52965 MEANS FOR EFFECT T T NOS 3 3 32DAD 31.9600 33.2667 32.9267 33.1867 33.8133 39DAD 33.4333 40.0800 39.6533 39.7600 41.4467 46DAD 43.5533 45.5067 44.7267 45.4000 46.5867 SE(N= 3) 1.23844 0.516285 1.00149 5%LSD 8DF 4.03842 1.68355 3.26577 ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE SUMMARY TABLE FILE SPAD 23/ 2/21 23:17 :PAGE Effect of foliar fertilization on SPAD index of DT51 soybean F-PROBABLIITY VALUES FOR EACH EFFECT IN THE MODEL SECTION - VARIATE 32DAD 39DAD 46DAD GRAND MEAN (N= 15) NO OBS 15 33.031 15 38.875 15 45.155 STANDARD DEVIATION C OF V |REP SD/MEAN | BASED ON BASED ON % | TOTAL SS RESID SS | 1.7948 2.1450 6.5 0.7528 2.9778 0.89423 2.3 0.7224 1.7724 1.7346 3.8 0.4754 |T | | | 0.8689 0.0001 0.3670 | | | | 72 Effects of foliar fertilizers on yield components of DT51 soybean BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE TFRUIT FILE TFRUIT 24/ 2/21 0: :PAGE Effects of foliar fertilization on Total munber of fruits VARIATE V003 TFRUIT LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN F RATIO PROB ER SQUARES SQUARES LN ============================================================================= REP 1.10533 552666 0.80 0.486 T 7.26933 1.81733 2.63 0.114 * RESIDUAL 5.53466 691833 * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 14 13.9093 993523 TABLE OF MEANS FOR FACTORIAL EFFECTS FILE TFRUIT 24/ 2/21 0: :PAGE Effects of foliar fertilization on Total munber of fruits MEANS FOR EFFECT REP REP NOS 5 TFRUIT 25.9600 25.3000 25.5600 SE(N= 5) 0.371977 5%LSD 8DF 1.21298 MEANS FOR EFFECT T T NOS 3 3 TFRUIT 24.9333 25.7000 25.5333 25.0000 26.8667 SE(N= 3) 0.480220 5%LSD 8DF 1.56595 ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE SUMMARY TABLE FILE TFRUIT 24/ 2/21 0: :PAGE Effects of foliar fertilization on Total munber of fruits F-PROBABLIITY VALUES FOR EACH EFFECT IN THE MODEL SECTION - VARIATE TFRUIT GRAND MEAN (N= 15) NO OBS 15 25.607 STANDARD DEVIATION C OF V |REP SD/MEAN | BASED ON BASED ON % | TOTAL SS RESID SS | 0.99676 0.83177 3.2 0.4857 |T | | | 0.1140 | | | | BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE EFRUIT FILE EFRUIT 24/ 2/21 0:20 :PAGE Effects of foliar fertilization on Number of effective friuts VARIATE V003 EFRUIT LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN F RATIO PROB ER 73 SQUARES SQUARES LN ============================================================================= REP 2.51141 1.25571 4.80 0.042 T 12.0886 3.02216 11.55 0.002 * RESIDUAL 2.09245 261557 * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 14 16.6925 1.19232 TABLE OF MEANS FOR FACTORIAL EFFECTS FILE EFRUIT 24/ 2/21 0:20 :PAGE Effects of foliar fertilization on Number of effective friuts MEANS FOR EFFECT REP REP NOS 5 EFRUIT 25.1200 24.2200 24.2880 SE(N= 5) 0.228717 5%LSD 8DF 0.745822 MEANS FOR EFFECT T T NOS 3 3 EFRUIT 23.5200 24.8033 24.6067 23.7367 26.0467 SE(N= 3) 0.295272 5%LSD 8DF 0.962852 ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE SUMMARY TABLE FILE EFRUIT 24/ 2/21 0:20 :PAGE Effects of foliar fertilization on Number of effective friuts F-PROBABLIITY VALUES FOR EACH EFFECT IN THE MODEL SECTION - VARIATE EFRUIT GRAND MEAN (N= 15) NO OBS 15 24.543 STANDARD DEVIATION C OF V |REP SD/MEAN | BASED ON BASED ON % | TOTAL SS RESID SS | 1.0919 0.51143 2.1 0.0425 |T | | | 0.0024 | | | | BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE M1000 FILE M1000 24/ 2/21 1:30 :PAGE Effects of foliar fertilization on mass1000 seeds VARIATE V003 M1000 LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN F RATIO PROB ER SQUARES SQUARES LN ============================================================================= REP 5.92616 2.96308 0.47 0.644 T 136.239 34.0597 5.42 0.021 * RESIDUAL 50.2705 6.28381 * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 14 192.435 13.7454 TABLE OF MEANS FOR FACTORIAL EFFECTS FILE M1000 24/ 2/21 1:30 :PAGE Effects of foliar fertilization on mass1000 seeds MEANS FOR EFFECT REP 74 REP NOS 5 M1000 218.968 217.466 217.924 SE(N= 5) 1.12105 5%LSD 8DF 3.65564 MEANS FOR EFFECT T T NOS 3 3 3 M1000 212.133 219.670 219.200 219.360 220.233 SE(N= 3) 1.44727 5%LSD 8DF 4.71942 ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE SUMMARY TABLE FILE M1000 24/ 2/21 1:30 :PAGE Effects of foliar fertilization on mass1000 seeds F-PROBABLIITY VALUES FOR EACH EFFECT IN THE MODEL SECTION - VARIATE M1000 GRAND MEAN (N= 15) NO OBS 15 218.12 STANDARD DEVIATION C OF V |REP SD/MEAN | BASED ON BASED ON % | TOTAL SS RESID SS | 3.7075 2.5068 1.1 0.6441 |T | | | 0.0211 | | | | 10 Effect of foliar fertilizers on actual yield of DT51 soybean BALANCED ANOVA FOR VARIATE NET FILE NET 3/ 3/21 21:48 :PAGE Effect of foliar fertilization on net yield of DT51 soybean VARIATE V003 NET LN SOURCE OF VARIATION DF SUMS OF MEAN F RATIO PROB ER SQUARES SQUARES LN ============================================================================= REP 740493 370246 2.02 0.195 T 3.24943 812357 4.43 0.036 * RESIDUAL 1.46797 183496 * TOTAL (CORRECTED) 14 5.45789 389849 TABLE OF MEANS FOR FACTORIAL EFFECTS FILE NET 3/ 3/21 21:48 :PAGE Effect of foliar fertilization on net yield of DT51 soybean MEANS FOR EFFECT REP REP NOS 5 NET 18.6140 18.9980 19.1400 SE(N= 5) 0.191571 5%LSD 8DF 0.624692 - 75 MEANS FOR EFFECT T T NOS 3 3 NET 18.2767 19.2000 18.6900 18.7800 19.6400 SE(N= 3) 0.247317 5%LSD 8DF 0.806474 ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE SUMMARY TABLE FILE NET 3/ 3/21 21:48 :PAGE Effect of foliar fertilization on net yield of DT51 soybean F-PROBABLIITY VALUES FOR EACH EFFECT IN THE MODEL SECTION - VARIATE NET GRAND MEAN (N= 15) NO OBS 15 18.917 STANDARD DEVIATION C OF V |REP SD/MEAN | BASED ON BASED ON % | TOTAL SS RESID SS | 0.62438 0.42836 2.3 0.1945 |T | | | 0.0355 | | | | 76