Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)
PowerPoint præsentation 1 MOIT 13 September 2019 11 september 2019 MOIT (EESD) and The Danish Energy Agency Benchmarking of Industrial Energy Consumption 1 Purpose with meeting 11 september 2019 2 Pre.
MOIT (EESD) and The Danish Energy Agency Benchmarking of Industrial Energy Consumption MOIT 13 SEPTEMBER 2019 9/8/22 PURPOSE WITH MEETING • Present and discuss benchmarking concept (method) (memo forwarded before meeting) • Present and discuss guidelines for enterprises based on draft memos of: 1) 2) 3) 4) Guideline for calculate/determine SEC-Target (forwarded before meeting) Guideline for how to calculate current SEC-value (forwarded before meeting) Guideline for how to assess deviation between SEC-Target and SEC-value (not forwarded) Guideline for the plan/roadmap for meeting the SEC-target in the coming 3-5 years (content, reporting (format), controlling etc.) (not forwarded) • Agree on further steps regarding guidelines and procedures for benchmarking including: I II III IV 9/8/22 Input from two breweries and DOITs (2-4 partner DOITs) Finalization of guidelines Preparing DOIT-procedures for administering the benchmarking circulares Preparing for the WS in Nov/Dec – should guidelines and procedures be conculcated? BENCHMARKING METHODOLOGY 9/8/22 SOME DEFINITIONS… SEC-Target: The target for a given sector and production type/volume stated in the relevant benchmarking circular (Circular 19 for Beer and Beverage Industry) If the production is a mix of products stated in the circular, the SEC-Target has to be calculated by the enterprise SEC-Value: The actual SEC of the production facility Based on actual energy consumption and production volume at the facility The actual SEC can be based on metering (one or more meters) the energy consumption in the production facility or by “best assumptions” of the energy consumption The production volume can be related to different types of products 9/8/22 IDEWORKSHOP DEN 24 OKTOBER 2018 OVERALL METHODOLOGY APPROACH /1 • The methodology is based on a combination of a “explanatory” and a “hard” approach • Obligations for the enterprises: • Each year the enterprise have to: Determine the SEC-Target for the production site based on last years production mix and volume Calculate the actual SEC-Value for the production site based on last years production volume and energy consumption Clarify the deviation between SEC-Target and current SEC-Value Prepare a plan (roadmap) for the coming 3-5 years for how to bring SEC-Value closer to SEC-Target Report 1-4 to the DOIT using the templates in the circular 9/8/22 OVERALL METHODOLOGY APPROACH /2 • Obligations for the DOIT: • Each year the DOIT have to (to be discussed with the DOITs): Control if the enterprise comply with the circular by controlling the yearly report from the enterprises (procedures are to be developed) Be in dialogue with the enterprises to give inspiration for energy measures and information on the obligations to comply with the benchmarking circulars (to be discussed) Give cautions and fines if the enterprise not meet the SEC-Target or hand in a realistic roadmap (to be clarified in Decree 134) • In general the methodology is developed for DEUs but can be used by non-DEUs as well Needed changes/other requirements/approaches for the non-DEUs have to be discussed 9/8/22 DELIVERABLES • guidelines for enterprises: 1) Determine the SEC-Target 2) Calculate the current SEC-Value 3) Assess the deviation between SEC-Target and SEC-Value 4) How to prepare plan for meeting the SEC-Target • Memo with results from testing the guidelines at two breweries • Concept note on DOIT-procedures on how to administer the benchmarking circulars • Input to MOIT to relevant changes of Circular 09 and Decree 134 9/8/22 IDEWORKSHOP DEN 24 OKTOBER 2018 GUIDELINE FOR ENTERPRISES ON HOW TO DETERMINE THE SEC-TARGET 9/8/22 DETERMINE SEC-TARGET • A step-by-step guide for the enterprises DOITs will also use this guide • Two ways to determine the SEC-Target: • The production mix is stated directly in the circular: • Based on production volume and year the SEC-Target can be looked up in the circular directly • The production mix is not stated directly in the circular: • The SEC-Target can not be looked up directly in the circular and needs to be calculated: The calculation is a direct weight of the SEC-Target for the different product mix • The SEC-Target have to be determined each year, because: • The production volume can vary from year to year • The circular have different SEC-Targets for periods (2016-2020 and 2020-2025) 9/8/22 ASSESSMENT OF TECHNOLOGY SPECIFIC IMPROVEMENTS – EXAMPLE • Brewery Production: • Bottled beer: • Canned beer: 970,000 hl 1,415,000 hl • Draught beer: 15,000 hl • Total: 2,400,000 hl • Inputs • Reporting year: • Beer Production SECTarget,beer [MJ/hl] Beer Production [106 l/y] 9/8/22 2018 240,000,000 l Reporting Year [2016;2020] >100 [20-100] = the production is energy efficient • If SEC-deviation < = there might be a potential for improving the energy efficiency • Step is to compare the SEC-deviation from the current year with the SEC-deviation from last year • Step – only if SEC-deviation < an analysis of the possible improvements by technologies should be made – continue to step 9/8/22 19 POTENTIAL FOR TECHNOLOGY SPECIFIC IMPROVEMENTS • Method: • Step 4: An enterprise consist of a number of production technologies and utility systems The most significant have to be examined • Step 5: For each significant production technology and utility system, the actual level of energy efficiency in the company should be assessed as compared to best practice using the new technology specific guideline for the specific industrial sector • Step 6: The enterprise shall wrap-up conclusions on which deviations in energy efficiency that has been observed area by area For the DEUs this can be done as a part of the energy audit • Discussion: a Should only the most significant production technologies and utility systems be examined, or should all (7-8) the technologies and utility systems mentioned in the new guideline be examined? b Should the enterprise make assessment of each technology and utility system even if the SEC-deviation > and report this to DOIT? 9/8/22 20 ASSESSMENT OF TECHNOLOGY SPECIFIC IMPROVEMENTS – EXAMPLE 9/8/22 21 ASSESSMENT OF TECHNOLOGY SPECIFIC IMPROVEMENTS – EXAMPLE 9/8/22 22 GUIDELINE FOR ENTERPRISES ON HOW TO PREPARE ANNUAL PLAN TO BRING SEC-VALUE CLOSER TO SEC-TARGET 23 9/8/22 PLAN TO BRING SEC-VALUE CLOSER TO SEC-TARGET • A step-by-step guide for the enterprises DOIT will also use this guideline • Based on the assessment of the potential for EE of the most significant/all technologies and utility systems the enterprise must prepare a plan for how to meet (or get close to) the SEC-Target within the coming 3-5 years This plan will focus on each of the relevant technologies and utility systems within the production facility • Method: • Step 1: The enterprise must select a realistic and ambitious numbers of technologies and/or utility systems that will be improved within the next year and within the next 3-5 years • Step 2: For each selected technology/utility system the enterprise must prepare a project implementation plan • Step 3: Based on the project implementation plan the enterprise must determine the expected SEC for the coming year • Step 4: Based on the project implementation plan the enterprise must determine the expected time before the enterprise will meet the SEC-Target set in the sector specific circular (or calculated SEC-Target) 9/8/22 24 GUIDELINE FOR ENTERPRISES GENERAL REMARKS AND DISCUSSION 25 9/8/22 GUIDELINES – GENERAL REMARKS AND DISCUSSION • The guidelines are made for the enterprises but should also be used by DOITs – is this OK? • step-by-step guides are interconnected – it is suggested to merge the guidelines into one guideline – is this OK? • In general the calculations are relatively simple, but: • Indata might be relative difficult for some enterprises to determine • The circular gives a number of factors and conversion figures: • Heating values, electricity scaling, equivalent product scaling, etc • It is suggested to make a supporting excel-tool to the enterprises This could also be used to support the DOIT administration of the reported SEC-target/value • Are the reporting templates (for DOIT MOIT and for enterprises DOIT (annexes to the circular)) sufficient or should changes/updates be proposed in order to support both the enterprises (especially the non-DEUs) and the DOITs? Could perhaps also be included in a proposed excel tool • Would it be beneficial to integrate project implementation plans with 1-year plans and 3-5-year roadmaps as well as data in one combined platform / tool (in relation to circular 09) 9/8/22 26 WRAP-UP AND NEXT STEPS 27 9/8/22 WRAP-UP AND NEXT STEPS • Draft guidelines will be discussed with MOIT, two partner DOITs and DOIT of Hue and Hung Yen • Guidelines will be tested at two Vietnamese breweries (at Carlsberg in Hue and HABECO in Hanoi) • IC will prepare a memo on the visits to the two breweries • IC will finalize the draft guidelines based on feedback during the mission • Concept note for DOIT-procedures will be discussed with MOIT, two partner DOITs and DOIT of Hue and Hung Yen, IC will update the Procedure accordingly • LC will finalize the draft DOIT-procedure based on input during the mission 28 9/8/22 WRAP-UP AND NEXT STEPS • Adjusted, final guideline and procedure to be disseminated to DOITs during autumn • Setting date for next mission • Overall content of the WS during next mission: Training of the DOIT-procedures Presentation of the updated online-tool Concultation of the benchmark-circulars: method, guidelines and procedures • How can the guidelines and procedures be expanded to other sectors? (US-Aid – could be invited for the upcoming workshop?) 29 9/8/22 Contact Peter Kristensen 30 Andreas Riis Christiansen Chief Adviser Project Manager Viegand Maagøe A/S Viegand Maagøe A/S Tlf +45 31 75 17 23 Tlf +45 51 89 28 07 E-mail: pkr@viegandmaagoe.dk E-mail: arc@viegandmaagoe.dk WWW.VIEGANDMAAGOE.DK WWW.VIEGANDMAAGOE.DK ... guideline • Step is to calculate the deviation: • The basic calculation is relatively simple: • If SEC-deviation > = the production is energy efficient • If SEC-deviation < = there might be a potential... disseminated to DOITs during autumn • Setting date for next mission • Overall content of the WS during next mission: Training of the DOIT-procedures Presentation of the updated online-tool Concultation... Be in dialogue with the enterprises to give inspiration for energy measures and information on the obligations to comply with the benchmarking circulars (to be discussed) Give cautions and fines