Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics 8/1 Series Editors: Mehmet Huseyin Bilgin · Hakan Danis Mehmet Huseyin Bilgin Hakan Danis Ender Demir Ugur Can Editors Eurasian Business Perspectives Proceedings of the 20th Eurasia Business and Economics Society Conference - Vol Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics 8/1 Series editors Mehmet Huseyin Bilgin, Istanbul, Turkey Hakan Danis, San Francisco, CA, USA Representing Eurasia Business and Economics Society More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/13544 Mehmet Huseyin Bilgin • Hakan Danis • Ender Demir • Ugur Can Editors Eurasian Business Perspectives Proceedings of the 20th Eurasia Business and Economics Society Conference - Vol Editors Mehmet Huseyin Bilgin Faculty of Political Sciences Istanbul Medeniyet University Istanbul, Turkey Hakan Danis MUFG Union Bank San Francisco, California USA Ender Demir Faculty of Tourism Istanbul Medeniyet University Istanbul, Turkey Ugur Can Eurasia Business & Economic Society Fatih, Istanbul Turkey The authors of individual papers are responsible for technical, content, and linguistic correctness ISSN 2364-5067 ISSN 2364-5075 (electronic) Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics ISBN 978-3-319-67912-9 ISBN 978-3-319-67913-6 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67913-6 Library of Congress Control Number: 2017956268 © Springer International Publishing AG 2018 This work is subject to copyright All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations Printed on acid-free paper This Springer imprint is published by Springer Nature The registered company is Springer International Publishing AG The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland Preface This is the eighth issue of the Springer’s series Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, which is the official book series of the Eurasia Business and Economics Society (EBES, http://www.ebesweb.org) The issue is divided into two volumes, and this volume includes selected papers in the field of business that were presented at the 20th EBES Conference The conference was held on September 28–30, 2016, at the IFM—Real Estate and Facility Management at TU Wien in Vienna, Austria, with the support of Istanbul Economic Research Association Prof John Rust from Georgetown University, USA, and Prof Alexander Redlein from Vienna University of Technology, Austria, joined the conference as keynote speakers All accepted papers for this volume went through a peer-review process and benefited from the comments made during the conference as well During the conference, participants had many productive discussions and exchanges that contributed to the success of the conference where 261 papers by 420 colleagues from 60 countries were presented In addition to publication opportunities in EBES journals (Eurasian Business Review and Eurasian Economic Review, which are also published by Springer), conference participants were given opportunity to submit their full papers for this volume Theoretical and empirical papers in the series cover diverse areas of business, economics, and finance from many different countries, providing a valuable opportunity to researchers, professionals, and students to catch up with the most recent studies in a diverse set of fields across many countries and regions The aim of the EBES conferences is to bring together scientists from business, finance, and economics fields, attract original research papers, and provide them publication opportunities This volume covers a wide variety of topics in the field of business and provides empirical results from many different countries and regions that are less investigated in the existing literature The main business fields represented in this volume are: v vi (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) Preface ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE MANAGEMENT AND MARKETING HUMAN RESOURCES AND EDUCATION RISK MANAGEMENT Although the papers in this issue may provide empirical results for a specific country or regions, we believe that the readers would have an opportunity to catch up with the most recent studies in a diverse set of fields across many countries and regions and empirical support for the existing literature In addition, the findings from these papers could be valid for similar economies or regions On behalf of the Series Editors, Volume Editors, and EBES officers, I would like to thank all presenters, participants, board members, and the keynote speaker, and we are looking forward to seeing you at the upcoming EBES conferences Istanbul, Turkey Ender Demir Eurasia Business and Economics Society (EBES) EBES is a scholarly association for scholars involved in the practice and study of economics, finance, and business worldwide EBES was founded in 2008 with the purpose of not only promoting academic research in the field of business and economics but also encouraging the intellectual development of scholars In spite of the term “Eurasia,” the scope should be understood in its broadest terms as having a global emphasis EBES aims to bring worldwide researchers and professionals together through organizing conferences and publishing academic journals and increase economics, finance, and business knowledge through academic discussions To reach its goal, EBES benefits from its executive and advisory boards which consist of well-known academicians from all around the world Every year, with the inclusion of new members, our executive and advisory boards became more diverse and influential I would like to thank them for their support EBES conferences and journals are open to all economics, finance, and business scholars and professionals around the world Any scholar or professional interested in economics, finance, and business is welcome to attend EBES conferences Since 2012, EBES has been organizing three conferences every year Since our first conference, around 9132 colleagues from 92 different countries have joined our conferences and 5240 academic papers have been presented Also, in a very short period of time, EBES has reached 1713 members from 84 countries Since 2011, EBES has been publishing two academic journals One of those journals, Eurasian Business Review—EABR, is in the fields of industry and business, and the other one, Eurasian Economic Review—EAER, is in the fields of economics and finance Both journals are published thrice a year, and we are committed to having both journals included in SSCI as soon as possible Both journals have been published by Springer since 2014 and are currently indexed in Scopus, the Emerging Sources Citation Index (Thomson Reuters), EconLit, Google Scholar, EBSCO, ProQuest, ABI/INFORM, Business Source, International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS), OCLC, Research Papers in Economics (RePEc), Summon by ProQuest, and TOC Premier vii viii Eurasia Business and Economics Society (EBES) Furthermore, since 2014 Springer has started to publish a new conference proceedings series (Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics) which includes selected papers from the EBES conferences Also, the 10th, 11th, 12th, 13th, 14th, 15th, and 17th EBES Conference Proceedings have already been accepted for inclusion in the Thomson Reuters’ Conference Proceedings Citation Index The 16th, 18th, and subsequent conference proceedings are in progress On behalf of the EBES officers, I sincerely thank you for your participation and look forward to seeing you at our future conferences In order to improve our future conferences, we welcome your comments and suggestions Our success is only possible with your valuable feedback and support With my very best wishes, Jonathan Batten, PhD President EBES Executive Board Jonathan Batten, Monash University, Australia Iftekhar Hasan, Fordham University, U.S.A Euston Quah, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore Peter Rangazas, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, U.S.A John Rust, Georgetown University, U.S.A Marco Vivarelli, Universit a Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Italy Klaus F Zimmermann, UNU-MERIT, Maastricht University, The Netherlands EBES Advisory Board Hassan Aly, Department of Economics, Ohio State University, U.S.A Ahmet Faruk Aysan, Istanbul Sehir University, Turkey Michael R Baye, Kelley School of Business, Indiana University, U.S.A Wolfgang Dick, ESSEC Business School, France Mohamed Hegazy, School of Management, Economics and Communication, The American University in Cairo, Egypt Cheng Hsiao, Department of Economics, University of Southern California, U.S.A Philip Y Huang, China Europe International Business School, China Noor Azina Ismail, University of Malaya, Malaysia Irina Ivashkovskaya, State University—Higher School of Economics, Russia Hieyeon Keum, University of Seoul, South Korea Christos Kollias, Department of Economics, University of Thessaly, Greece William D Lastrapes, Terry College of Business, University of Georgia, U.S.A Rita Martenson, School of Business, Economics and Law, Goteborg University, Sweden Eurasia Business and Economics Society (EBES) ix Steven Ongena, University of Zurich, Switzerland Panu Poutvaara, Faculty of Economics, University of Munich, Germany Peter Szilagyi, Central European University, Hungary M Ibrahim Turhan, The Grand National Assembly, Turkey Russ Vince, University of Bath, United Kingdom Wing-Keung Wong, Department of Finance, Asia University, Taiwan Naoyuki Yoshino, Faculty of Economics, Keio University, Japan Organizing Committee Jonathan Batten, PhD, Monash University, Australia Mehmet Huseyin Bilgin, PhD, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Turkey Hakan Danis, PhD, Union Bank, U.S.A Pascal Gantenbein, PhD, University of Basel, Switzerland Ender Demir, PhD, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Turkey Orhun Guldiken, University of Arkansas, U.S.A Ugur Can, EBES, Turkey Reviewers Sagi Akron, PhD, University of Haifa, Israel Ahmet Faruk Aysan, PhD, Istanbul Sehir University, Turkey Mehmet Huseyin Bilgin, PhD, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Turkey Hakan Danis, PhD, Union Bank, U.S.A Ender Demir, PhD, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Turkey Pascal Gantenbein, PhD, University of Basel, Switzerland Orhun Guldiken, University of Arkansas, U.S.A Peter Harris, PhD, New York Institute of Technology, U.S.A Mohamed Hegazy, The American University in Cairo, Egypt Gokhan Karabulut, PhD, Istanbul University, Turkey Christos Kollias, University of Thessaly, Greece Davor Labasˇ, PhD, University of Zagreb, Croatia Chi Keung Marco Lau, PhD, University of Northumbria, United Kingdom Gregory Lee, PhD, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa Nidžara Osmanagić-Bedenik, PhD, University of Zagreb, Croatia Euston Quah, PhD, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore Peter Rangazas, PhD, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, U.S.A Doojin Ryu, PhD, Chung-Ang University, South Korea Manuela Tvaronavicˇiene˙, PhD, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Lithuania 374 E Dziawgo Delta Coefficient of the Floating Barrier Options The delta coefficient is a measure of sensitivity determining the impact of the price of the underlying instrument on the option price The delta is one of the most important risk measures of the option’s price The delta coefficient indicates by how much an option’s price will change when the price of the underlying instrument changes by one unit A positive delta value means that an increase/decrease in the price of the underlying instrument impacts the rise/fall in the price of option However, if the delta coefficient is negative, then an increase/decrease in the price of the underlying instrument causes a decrease/increase in the option price If the option has a greater absolute value of the delta coefficient, then the increase sensitivity of the price of the option to fluctuations in the price of the underlying instrument can be observed (Dziawgo 2010; Dziawgo 2003; Hull 2005; Wilmott 1998) 3.1 Delta Coefficient of the Down-and-In Call Option and the Down-and-Out Call Option Table presents the impact of the price of the underlying instrument and rate of change of the barrier on the shaping of the delta coefficient for discussed down-andin call options However, the Table shows the impact of the price of the underlying instrument and rate of change of the barrier on the development of the delta coefficient for down-and-out call options The delta coefficient of down-and-in call options is negative The increase in the price of the underlying instrument contributes to the decrease in the absolute value of the delta coefficient of the down-and-in call options Then the option is the less sensitive to a change in the price of the underlying instrument The option with a greater rate of change of the barrier is characterized by a greater absolute value of the delta coefficient This reflects a greater sensitivity of the price of this option to Table The impact of the price of the underlying instrument and rate of change of the barrier on the shaping of the delta coefficient of down-and-in call options The price of the underlying instrument [USD] 1.09 1.10 1.11 1.12 1.13 1.14 Delta of option rate of change of the barrier n ¼ À0.02 À0.3132 À0.2529 À0.2103 À0.1672 À0.1324 À0.1012 Delta of option rate of change of the barrier n ¼ À0.4589 À0.3414 À0.2631 À0.2139 À0.1389 À0.1094 Source: Elaborated by the author based on own calculations Delta of option rate of change of the barrier n ¼ 0.02 À0.5332 À0.3987 À0.2945 À0.2699 À0.1599 À0.1105 Barrier Option and Floating Barrier Option: Analysis of Delta Risk 375 Table The impact of the price of the underlying instrument and rate of change of the barrier on the shaping of the delta coefficient of down-and-out call options The price of the underlying instrument [USD] 1.09 1.10 1.11 1.12 1.13 1.14 Delta of option rate of change of the barrier n ¼ À0.02 0.8542 0.8126 0.7696 0.7274 0.6945 0.6755 Delta of option rate of change of the barrier n ¼ 0.8815 0.8497 0.8193 0.7951 0.7827 0.7733 Delta of option rate of change of the barrier n ¼ 0.02 0.9216 0.8767 0.8552 0.8412 0.8483 0.8387 Source: Elaborated by the author based on own calculations the change in the price of the underlying instrument When the price of the underlying instrument approximates the barrier, there is the significant increase in the absolute values of the delta coefficient Then the price of the option has a greater sensitivity to changes in the price of the underlying instrument The delta coefficient of down-and-out call options takes positive values The highest value of the delta coefficient observed in the case when the price of the underlying instrument tends to the barrier Then the options are the most sensitive to a change in the price of the underlying instrument The option with greater rate of change of the barrier has the highest value of the delta coefficient Therefore, this option has the greater sensitivity to fluctuations in the price of the underlying instrument The increase/decrease in the price of the underlying instrument impacts the fall/rise in the value of delta coefficient 3.2 Delta Coefficient of the Up-and-In Put Option and the Up-and-Out Put Option Table illustrates the impact of the price of the underlying instrument and rate of change of the barrier on the formation of the value of the delta for discussed up-andin put options However, the Table shows the impact of the price of the underlying instrument and rate of change of the barrier on the development of the value of the delta coefficient for analyzed up-and-out put options The delta coefficient of up-and-in put options is positive The increase in the price of the underlying instrument influences the growth in the value of the delta coefficient of the up-and-in put options The increase in the rate of change of the barrier impacts the significant fall value of the delta coefficient Therefore, the price of option with a smaller rate of change of the barrier is less sensitive to fluctuations in the price of the underlying instrument When the price of the underlying instrument approaches the barrier, there is the rise in the value of the delta 376 E Dziawgo Table The impact of the price of the underlying instrument and rate of change of the barrier on the shaping of the delta coefficient of up-and-in put options The price of the underlying instrument [USD] 1.09 1.10 1.11 1.12 1.13 1.14 Delta of option rate of change of the barrier n ¼ À0.02 0.0567 0.0785 0.1041 0.1333 0.1699 0.2123 Delta of option rate of change of the barrier n ¼ 0.0444 0.0579 0.0740 0.0924 0.1230 0.1641 Delta of option rate of change of the barrier n ¼ 0.02 0.0197 0.0246 0.0299 0.0357 0.0719 0.1085 Source: Elaborated by the author based on own calculations Table The impact of the price of the underlying instrument and rate of change of the barrier on the shaping of the delta coefficient of up-and-out put options The price of the underlying instrument [USD] 1.09 1.10 1.11 1.12 1.13 1.14 Delta of option rate of change of the barrier n ¼ À0.02 À0.5907 À0.5134 À0.4427 À0.3781 À0.3347 À0.3117 Delta of option rate of change of the barrier n ¼ À0.5712 À0.4975 À0.4251 À0.3655 À0.3276 À0.2475 Delta of option rate of change of the barrier n ¼ 0.02 À0.4867 À0.4029 À0.3305 À0.2648 À0.2157 À0.1789 Source: Elaborated by the author based on own calculations coefficient and thus there is also the increase in the sensitivity of the price of options to the change of the price of the underlying instrument The delta coefficient of up-and-out put options takes negative values, which means that the increase/decrease in the price of the underlying instrument influences the decline/growth in the price of the option The increase/decrease in the price of the underlying instrument contributes to the fall/rise in the absolute value of the delta coefficient of the up-and-in put options With the rising rate of change of the barrier, the absolute value of the delta coefficient decreases This reflects the less sensitivity of the price of the option with greater rate of change of the barrier to the change in the price of the underlying instrument Conclusion By modifying the pay-off function of barrier options it is possible to impact significantly changes in the options price and its sensitivity to risk factors and, therefore, make options a more attractive instrument for hedging and speculative Barrier Option and Floating Barrier Option: Analysis of Delta Risk 377 transactions As a result of the modification the pay-off function of barrier options, a financial product with a higher degree of complexity is obtained, which allows us to develop a more precise security of the implemented investment to reach the expected volatility of the underlying instrument The floating barrier is factor that significantly influence on the option price and its sensitivity The floating barrier options allow you to increase the precision of the security of the investment being implemented to the expected volatility of the price of the underlying instrument References Dziawgo, E (2003) Modele kontrakt ow opcyjnych [Models of the options] Torun: UMK Dziawgo, E (2010) Wprowadzenie strategii opcyjnych [Introduction to options strategy] Torun: UMK Dziawgo, E (2013) Miary wraz˙liwos´ci opcji jednoczynnikowych [Sensitivity measures of one-factor exotic options] Warsaw: CeDeWu Hull, J C (2005) Options, futures and other derivatives New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall Musiela, M., & Rutkowski, M (1997) Martingale methods in financial modelling Berlin: Springer Nelken, I (2000) Pricing, hedging and trading exotic options New York: McGraw-Hill Ong, M (1996) Exotic options: The market and their taxonomy In I Nelken (Ed.), The handbook of exotic options (pp 3–44) Chicago: IRWIN Professional Publishing Wilmott, P (1998) Derivatives Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Zhang, P G (2001) Exotic options A guide to second generation options Singapore: World Scientific Perspectives on Internal Control and Enterprise Risk Management _ Kaya Idil Abstract Grounded on the literature review on Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) this paper aims to analyze the extent and the effectiveness of internal control as well as ERM and to explore their connection with the value creation A theoretical lens is used to discuss whether effective internal control and ERM enhance performance and increase value creation ability ERM is most frequently defined with the reference to the 2004 Guidance document published by Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of Treadway Commission (COSO) Proponents of COSO’s ERM Integrated Framework describe this framework as “a world-level template for best practice”, and claim that ERM used by management to enhance an organization ability to manage uncertainty and to consider how much risk to accept as it strives to increase stakeholder value Additionally the Internal Control— Integrated Framework is a viable and suitable framework for designing, implementing, conducting and assessing the effectiveness of internal control and for reporting The relationship between value creation and ERM is widely investigated in academic literature Empirical studies on the value creation abilities of ERM and internal control suggest that there is a positive relation between value creation, internal control and ERM These studies reveal that firm performance and value are enhanced by high-quality ERM adoption and implementation Using different identifier of ERM such as Standard and Poor’s risk management ratings or presence of a Chief Risk Officer, the findings of empirical studies reveal that higher ERM quality is associated with less resource constraint, better corporate governance and better accounting performance Additionally academic studies indicate that the risk-based communication is reinforced with ERM implication Keywords Enterprise risk management • Internal control • Value creation I˙ Kaya (*) Department of Business Administration, Galatasaray University, Istanbul, Turkey e-mail: ikaya@gsu.edu.tr © Springer International Publishing AG 2018 M.H Bilgin et al (eds.), Eurasian Business Perspectives, Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics 8/1, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67913-6_26 379 380 I˙ Kaya Introduction Changing business and operating environments, increased competition, technology driven, global scale and complex structure of companies have increased the importance of effective internal control and risk management Enterprise risk management (ERM) is a process that is viewed today as an indicator for optimal achievement of companies’ mission and execution of its strategy This is also a coping mechanism vis-a-vis new demand for reporting purposes and additional compliance mandate placed on organizations to have effective internal control and risk management Rating agencies e.g Standard & Poor’s have included ERM assessment in ratings of insurance companies since 2007 Furthermore the stakeholders’ demand for more transparency and accountability on the business decisions and governance forces enterprises to have effective internal control and ERM Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of Treadway Commission (COSO) has released two frameworks provide guidance for management in implementing and evaluating effective enterprise risk management and internal control processes, leading to the improvement of organizational performance and governance These are COSO’s Internal Control—Integrated Framework and COSO’s Enterprise Risk Management—Integrated Framework COSO guidance is recognized as being globally and its integrated frameworks are viewed as being the principal tools that enable organizations to enhance their capacity in dealing with uncertainty that presents both risk and opportunity with the potential to erode or enhance value Proponents of COSO’s ERM Integrated Framework describe this framework as “a world-level template for best practice”, and claim that ERM used by management to strengthen an organization ability to manage uncertainty and to consider how much risk to accept as it strives to increase stakeholder value Additionally the Internal Control—Integrated Framework is a viable and suitable framework for designing, implementing, conducting and assessing the effectiveness of internal control and for reporting COSO’s principal argument is that the essential prerequisites of firms’ long term success are good risk management and internal control (DeLoach and Thomson 2014) While internal control has been always an important field for internal and external audit, risk management has been a vital concern on the fields of finance and insurance but it is received widespread attention following accounting and corporate scandals in the beginning 2000s and 2008 global crisis (Wu et al 2015) Section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act and its impacts and repercussions on global capital markets have put the spotlight on COSO’s Internal Control Framework and the recent economic crisis has heightened considerably the importance of ERM (Landsittel and Rittenberg 2010) Grounded on the literature review on ERM this paper aims to analyze the extent and the effectiveness of internal control as well as ERM and to explore their connection with the value creation A theoretical lens is used to discuss whether effective internal control and ERM enhance performance and increase value creation ability The remainder of the paper is presented in three sections Section expands upon the COSO Integrated Frameworks This is followed by the related Perspectives on Internal Control and Enterprise Risk Management 381 literature that provides an overview of empirical research findings on internal control and enterprise risk management The fourth and final section provides a conclusion providing some final comments COSO Integrated Frameworks Whether applied individually or together, COSO frameworks are the principal guidance used by organizations to address internal and external pressures placed on them to have effective internal control and risk management Originally formed in 1985, COSO is voluntary private sector initiative dedicated to improve organizational performance and governance through effective internal control, enterprise risk management, and fraud deterrence Its sponsoring organizations are the Institute of Internal Auditors, the American Accounting Association, and the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Financial Executives International, and the Institute of Management Accountants COSO’s first Internal Control Framework is released in 1992 and is admitted widely as a recognized standard for developing and maintaining effective and efficient internal control On May 14, 2013, as a result of multiyear project, COSO updated this Framework to include enhancements and clarifications for users COSO (2013a, p 3) defines internal control as “a process, affected by an entity’s board of directors, management, and other personnel, designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the achievement of objectives in the following categories: – Effectiveness and efficiency of operations – Reliability of financial reporting – Compliance with applicable laws and regulations” There is a growing support for the general argument that the effectiveness of internal control is a crucial and challenging system for organizations COSO’s Internal Control Framework is developed in expecting to help and support organizations to design, implement, conduct and assess these systems of internal control Components, objectives and entity levels presented three dimensions of internal control These are presented in Table Table Three dimensions of internal control Components Control environments Risk assessment Control activities Information and communication Monitoring activities Source: COSO (1992) Objectives Operations Reporting Compliance Organizational levels Entity level Division Operating unit Function 382 I˙ Kaya The strength of the internal control system is to improve organizations’ achievements of their objectives through providing effectiveness and efficiency of their operations, reliability of their financial reporting and compliance with applicable laws and regulations Internal control system needs to be assessed regularly to check its effectiveness There are 17 relevant principles associated with the internal components These are presented in Table Another area that COSO provides guidance is risk management that organizations need to effectively deal with uncertainty for optimal achievement of their mission and execution of their strategy ERM Integrated Framework is developed as a process, ongoing and flowing through the enterprise that comprises aligning risk appetite and strategy, improving risk responses of the entity and seizing opportunities According to Arnold et al (2015), this strategic approach to the risk management concentrates on the opportunity side of risk identification and response ERM is defined by COSO (2004, p 4) as “a process, affected by an entity’s board of directors, management and other personnel, applied in strategy setting and across the enterprise, designed to identify potential events that may affect the entity, Table Principles of internal control 17 Principals by internal control components Control environment Commitment to integrity and ethical values Oversight of the development and performance of internal control Establishment of structures, reporting, authorities and responsibilities Commitment to competence Accountability Risk assessment Suitable objectives Risk identification and analysis Assessment of fraud risk Identification and analysis of significant change Control activities 10 Selection and development of control activities 11 Selection and development of general controls over technology 12 Deployment through policies and procedures Information and communication 13 Use of relevant information 14 Internal communication 15 External communication Monitoring 16 Conduct of ongoing and/or separate evaluations 17 Evaluation and communication of deficiencies Source: COSO (2013b) Internal Control Integrated Framework Poster, www.coso.org Perspectives on Internal Control and Enterprise Risk Management 383 and manage risks to be within its risk appetite, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the achievement of the entity’s objectives” Internal control is an integral part of ERM COSO’s ERM Framework (2004) and its new exposure draft emphasize that where properly implemented and executed ERM enables organizations to grow shareholder’s value through facilitating management’s ability deal effectively with uncertainty and enhancing the ability to communicate value creation The COSO’s three dimensional model of ERM that is similar to its Internal Control Framework is presented in Table COSO’s ERM model allows managers to understand and assess risks from a total enterprise perspective rather than a silo-based approach (Moeller 2007, 2011) This is a portfolio view of risk in which risks are considered in terms of total organization, whether it is related to strategy, governance, human resources, IT systems or supply chains Considering risks on a total enterprise level enables organizations to obtain systematic comprehension of the interdependencies and correlations among risks (McShane et al 2011) The ERM’s approach consists of identification of all possible risks and the choice of right risk response within the risk appetite (Soltanizadeh et al 2016) Through integrated decision making across all risk classes, ERM allows detecting the risks inherent in different business activities and provides a more objective basis for capital allocation (Hoyt and Liebenberg 2015) It differs from traditional risk management in the way that it manages risk in a portfolio view rather than independently ERM is designed to identify and classify all risks that organization faces and to create one internal risk management system (Jabbour and Abdel-Kader 2015) Furthermore, Hoyt and Liebenberg (2015) assert that this holistic approach helps organization to reduce earnings volatility as well as cash flow volatility by accomplishing the net effects of all the significant risks COSO’s frameworks give description of fundamental components and propose a common language; and they are intended to be integrated within the governance and management The presence of eight components and their proper functioning are fundamental factors for the ERM’s capabilities in an organization These interrelated components are presented in Table In this Table Three dimensions of ERM Components Internal environments Objective setting Event identification Risk assessment Risk response Control activities Information and communication Source: COSO (2004) Objectives Strategic Operations Reporting Compliance Organizational levels Entity level Division Business unit Subsidiary 384 I˙ Kaya Table COSO’s ERM framework components and their interrelations ERM components Internal environment – commitment to competence – discipline – governance structures within the risk culture of the organization # Linking performance objectives to the strategic objectives # Event identification # Risk assessment # Risk responses for all events within the firm risk appetite based on an appropriate risk assessment # Control activities to assure that risk responses are effectively carried on Information and communication # Monitoring Source: O’Donnell (2005) multidimensional process, eliminating material weaknesses and bringing risk within the enterprise’s risk appetite are the main features of ERM Qualitative and quantitative risk assessment can be carried using Likert Scales or financial and economic measures Risk maps, risk scoreboards, key risk indicators and risk measures are used to report evaluation of risks for internal and external purposes (Arena et al 2010) DeLoach and Thomson (2014) insist that COSO frameworks are designed to provide value to the governance, strategy setting, business planning, execution, monitoring and adapting processes of an enterprise ERM and internal control are said to create a common language to communicate more effectively in all level of an entity’s activities, from strategy setting to operations Furthermore this process is said to assist to decrease volatility in stock price and earnings and external capital cost Nevertheless ERM implementation imposes financial, human resources and IT systems that in turn augment costs (McShane et al 2011; Gatzert and Martin 2015) Additionally, Lundqvist (2014) argued that the implementation of ERM requires considerable time resources and commitment To conclude this section, professional literature asserts that ERM increases value, trust and credibility and improves risk-based communication, internal reporting and management systems Next section aims to highlight the focus of the academic literature on the internal control and ERM and their connection with the value creation Perspectives on Internal Control and Enterprise Risk Management 385 Empirical Researches on Internal Control and ERM ERM and internal control is a fast growing area of interest in the academic research Empirical studies use public information or survey data for measuring ERM implementation and majority of these studies have positive findings on the relationship of value creation and ERM Different measures are used in empirical studies of internal control and ERM Tobin’s Q ratio is the most commonly used as proxy for firm value in empirical risk management studies This widely used ratio compares the market value of a firm’s assets to their replacement cost (Hoyt and Liebenberg 2011, 2015) It is usually calculated as the market value of equity plus the book value of liabilities divided by the book value of assets (Hoyt and Liebenberg 2011; McShane et al 2011) Beasley et al (2008) examine equity market reactions to announcements of appointments of senior executive officers overseeing the ERM processes Researchers use also different measures for the identification of ERM practices in a firm The existence of a Chief Risk Officer (CRO) position or similarly a senior risk officer is widely used as an identifier of ERM implication (Lundqvist 2014; Beasley et al 2008; Hoyt and Liebenberg 2011; Liebenberg and Hoyt 2003; Pagach and Warr 2011) In several studies, firms have been asked directly through survey about their level of ERM implementation (Beasley et al 2005) Risk management ratings from S&P are also used by many empirical studies (McShane et al 2011) S&P ratings are said to be more sophisticated and comprehensive measure of ERM (Lundqvist 2014) Gordon et al (2009) create an ERM index; variable data are collected from publicly available information, for example: sales, number of employees, material weakness disclosures, announcements of financial restatements, and auditor fees The findings of this study suggest that the connection between ERM and firm performance is related to the proper match between ERM and firm level factors These factors are the contextual variables surrounding the firm such as environment uncertainty, industry competition, firm complexity, and monitoring by Board of Directors Razali et al (2011) examined the determinants of ERM adoption in Malaysian Public Listed Companies and they found that firms with high turnover, appointing CRO and not diversifying internationally seem to adopt ERM Lundqvist (2014) distinguished four components or pillars of ERM to measure how firms implement ERM dimensions The first pillar is the general internal environment and objective setting; the second pillar is the general control activities, information and communication; the third one is the holistic organization of risk management; and finally the fourth pillar is the specific identification and risk assessment activities According to the author, a well implemented ERM must have all four pillars; but only the third one separates ERM from non-ERM companies According to DeLoach and Thomson (2014), the COSO ERM framework enhances risk-focused communication that comprises the issues relevant to improving governance, assessing risk, designing risk responses and control activities, 386 I˙ Kaya facilitating relevant information and communication flows, and monitoring ERM and internal control performance Baxter et al (2013) pointed also the positive aspects of ERM; and they found that “higher quality ERM is associated with better corporate governance (i.e., audit committees charged with direct oversight of risk), less audit-related risk (i.e., stable auditor relationships and effective internal controls), presence of risk officers/committees, and boards with longer tenure” (Baxter et al 2013, p 1265) O’Donnell (2005) developed a theoretical understanding of how and when ERM facilitates value chain activities Paape and Spekle´ (2012) investigated risk management effectiveness of COSO Frameworks for the mechanistic view on risk appetite and tolerance Liebenberg and Hoyt (2003) found that financial leverage is positively associated with ERM implementation, but using a broader set of indicators, Hoyt and Liebenberg (2011) found that ERM has a negative relation to leverage According to Liebenberg and Hoyt (2003), a major obstacle to empirical research in ERM is the difficulty in identifying firms engaging in ERM Firms typically not disclose whether they are managing risks in an integrated manner Grace et al (2015) investigated specific aspects of ERM’s value creation in insurance companies and they found that ERM practices significantly increase costs and revenues efficiency and they documented the impact of board involvement on reducing firm costs and augmenting firm value Beasley et al (2005) pointed the positive relationship between ERM implication and the presence of CRO, board independence, audit by Big Four accounting firms and entity size; they also suggest that the implication stage is positively related to the banking, education, and insurances industries Lundqvist (2015) suggests that stakeholders’ desires for better governance of the risk management system place the pressures on firms to implement ERM Based on the study of equity market reactions to the hiring of CRO’s Beasley et al (2008) suggest that they cannot make any board claims about benefits and costs of ERM since they find no significant market responses to the announcements of appointments of CRO’s Nevertheless they assert that the benefits of ERM differ across companies and depend on certain firm-level factors Earnings volatility, low amounts of leverage and low amounts of cash on hands have positive reactions to ERM implementation They found that these specific benefits are related to nonfinancial firms, but not for financial firms McShane et al (2011) examined the relationship between risk management and firm value using S&P’s ERM ratings They found a positive relationship between firm value and increasing level of traditional risk management but not for a higher ERM rating Their findings suggest that firm value augments as firms implement increasingly more sophisticated traditional risk management but does not augment further as firms attain ERM Arnold et al (2011) investigated ERM and organizational structure from a strategic management perspective in the context of Sarbanes Oxley Act’s section 404 requirements by companies They found a powerful relationship between the strength of ERM processes and organizational flexibility and this relation is mediated by the level of IT compatibility Furthermore, Arnold et al (2015) found that Perspectives on Internal Control and Enterprise Risk Management 387 ERM have a positive impact on supply chain performance and they imposed a theoretical understanding of ERM’s impact on the values chain activities To conclude this section, empirical studies on the value creation abilities of ERM and internal control present in general positive findings Most of the studies found positive relation between value creation, internal control and ERM These studies reveal that firm performance and value are enhanced by high-quality ERM adoption and implementation The studies which use Standard and Poor’s risk management ratings, reveal that higher ERM quality is associated with less resource constraint, better corporate governance and better accounting performance Beside these findings some researchers assert that there is no evidence that application of the COSO frameworks improve risk management and internal control effectiveness Neither they find a support for value creation ability of these frameworks There are still some questions to be posed and answered by researchers on the effectiveness and efficiency of internal control and ERM Conclusion Internal control and ERM effectiveness is crucial to identify events that may impact the organization’s well-being and erode the shareholder’s value and respond to identified risks New demand for reporting purposes and additional compliance mandate placed on organizations to have effective internal control and risk management have enhanced the role and importance of ERM COSO frameworks are the principal guidance used by organizations to address the issues relevant to improving governance, strategy setting, business planning, and execution, monitoring and adapting processes of an enterprise Over the past years, a substantial body of academic research on internal control and ERM has developed on the search of empirical evidence on whether and how they affect corporate values These studies have generated a number of findings that should be of interest to the development of risk management in companies Understanding how academic literature assesses internal control and ERM practices has significant value Also important is the recognition that the role of risk managers is crucial for companies that are positioned to strategically align their goals of main stakeholders Empirical researches support the significance and importance of the ERM practices on providing value for shareholders in an environment where the stakeholders are increasingly demanding for more transparency and accountability on the business decisions and governance Additionally academic studies indicate that the risk-based communication is reinforced with ERM implication Acknowledgement The author is grateful for the support provided by Galatasaray University Research Fund This work was supported by Galatasaray University Research Fund [grant number 16.102.002] 388 I˙ Kaya References Arena, M., Arnaboldi, M., & Azzone, G (2010) The organizational dynamics of enterprise risk management Accounting, Organizations and Society, 7, 659 Arnold, V., Benford, T., Canada, J., & Sutton, S G (2011) The role of strategic enterprise risk management and organizational flexibility in easing new regulatory compliance International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 12(3), 171–188 Arnold, V., Benford, T., Canada, J., & Sutton, S (2015) Leveraging integrated information systems to enhance strategic flexibility and performance: The enabling role of enterprise risk management International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 19, 1–16 Baxter, R., Bedard, J., Hoitash, R., & Yezegel, A (2013) Enterprise risk management program quality: Determinants, value relevance, and the financial crisis Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(4), 1264–1295 Beasley, M., Clune, R., & Hermanson, D (2005) Enterprise risk management: An empirical analysis of factors associated with the extent of implementation Journal of Accounting & Public Policy, 24(6), 521–531 Beasley, M., Pagach, D., & Warr, R (2008) Information conveyed in hiring announcements of senior executives overseeing enterprise-wide risk management processes Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 23(3), 311–332 COSO (1992) Internal control – Integrated framework New York: American Institute of Certified Public Accountants COSO (2004) Enterprise risk management – Integrated framework executive summary Accessed December 01, 2016, from http://www.theiia.org/media/files/virtualseminars/COSO_ERM_ Integrated_Framework.pdf COSO (2013a) Internal control integrated framework, executive summary [online] Accessed December 01, 2016, from https://na.theiia.org/standards-guidance/topics/Documents/Execu tive_Summary.pdf COSO (2013b) Internal control integrated framework poster [online] Accessed December 01, 2016, from www.coso.org./Documents/COSO-ICIF-11x17-Cube-Graphic.pdf DeLoach, J., & Thomson, J (2014) Improving organizational performance and governance how the COSO frameworks can help Research Commissioned by COSO [online] Accessed December 01, 2016, from www.coso.org./Documents/2014-2-10-COSO-Thought-Paper.pdf Gatzert, N., & Martin, M (2015) Determinants and value of enterprise risk management: Empirical evidence from the literature Risk Management & Insurance Review, 18(1), 29–53 Gordon, L A., Loeb, M P., & Tseng, C (2009) Enterprise risk management and firm performance: A contingency perspective Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 28(4), 301–327 Grace, M., Leverty, J., Phillips, R., & Shimpi, P (2015) The value of investing in enterprise risk management Journal of Risk and Insurance, 2, 289 Hoyt, R., & Liebenberg, A (2011) The value of enterprise risk management The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 4, 795 Hoyt, R., & Liebenberg, A (2015) Evidence of the value of enterprise risk management Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 1, 41 Jabbour, M., & Abdel-Kader, M (2015) Changes in capital allocation practices – ERM and organisational change Accounting Forum, 39(4), 295–311 Landsittel, D L., & Rittenberg, L E (2010) COSO: Working with the academic community Accounting Horizons, 24(3), 455 Liebenberg, A., & Hoyt, R (2003) The determinants of enterprise risk management: Evidence from the appointment of chief risk officers Risk Management & Insurance Review, 6(1), 37–52 Lundqvist, S A (2014) An exploratory study of enterprise risk management: Pillars of ERM Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 29(3), 393–429 Perspectives on Internal Control and Enterprise Risk Management 389 Lundqvist, S (2015) Why firms implement risk governance – Stepping beyond traditional risk management to enterprise risk management Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 34(5), 441–466 McShane, M., Nair, A., & Rustambekov, E (2011) Does enterprise risk management increase firm value? Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 26(4), 641–658 Moeller, R R (2007) COSO enterprise risk management: Understanding the new integrated ERM framework Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Moeller, R R (2011) COSO enterprise risk management: Establishing effective governance, risk, and compliance processes Hoboken, NJ: Wiley O’Donnell, E (2005) Enterprise risk management: A systems-thinking framework for the event identification phase International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 6, 177–195 Paape, L., & Spekle´, R (2012) The adoption and design of enterprise risk management practices: An empirical study European Accounting Review, 21(3), 533–564 Pagach, D., & Warr, R (2011) The characteristics of firms that hire chief risk officers Journal of Risk and Insurance, 78(1), 185–211 Razali, A., Yazid, A., & Tahir, I (2011) The determinants of Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) practices in Malaysian public listed companies Journal of Social and Development Sciences, (5), 202–207 Soltanizadeh, S., Abdul Rasid, S., Mottaghi Golshan, N., & Wan Ismail, W (2016) Business strategy, enterprise risk management and organizational performance Management Research Review, 39(9), 1016 Wu, D., Olson, D., & Dolgui, A (2015) Decision making in enterprise risk management: A review and introduction to special issue Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 1(4), 57 ... Mehmet Huseyin Bilgin • Hakan Danis • Ender Demir • Ugur Can Editors Eurasian Business Perspectives Proceedings of the 20th Eurasia Business and Economics Society Conference - Vol Editors Mehmet Huseyin... publishing two academic journals One of those journals, Eurasian Business Review—EABR, is in the fields of industry and business, and the other one, Eurasian Economic Review—EAER, is in the fields of... Springer International Publishing AG 2018 M.H Bilgin et al (eds.), Eurasian Business Perspectives, Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics 8/1, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67913-6_1 M