Phân tích ảnh hưởng của các nhân tố kinh tế vĩ mô đến thị trường chứng khoán việt nam

88 374 0
Phân tích ảnh hưởng của các nhân tố kinh tế vĩ mô đến thị trường chứng khoán việt nam

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

Thông tin tài liệu

I HC HU TRNG I HC KINH T KHOA K TON TI CHNH t H u - - KHểA LUN TT NGHIP I HC i h cK in h PHN TCH NH HNG CA CC NHN T KINH T V Mễ N TH TRNG CHNG KHON VIT NAM Giỏo viờn hng dn: Nguyn Tuyt Trinh TS Trn Th Bớch Ngc ng Sinh viờn thc hin: Lp: K44A TCNH Tr Niờn khúa: 2010 - 2014 Hu, thỏng nm 2014 TI: PHN TCH NH HNG CA CC NHN T KINH T V Mễ N TTCK VIT NAM u Lụứi Caỷm ễn u tiờn, em xin gi li cm n n Thy Cụ trng i hc Kinh t t H Hu núi chung v Thy Cụ khoa K toỏn Ti chớnh núi riờng, ó tn tõm ging dy em sut quỏ trỡnh hc v nghiờn cu ti trng c bit, em xin gi li cỏm n chõn thnh nht n TS Trn Th Bớch Ngc, h ngi ó trc tip hng dn em thc hin ti tt nghip Nh s hng in dn v ch bo tn tỡnh ca cụ, em ó cú c nhng kin thc v kinh nghim quý bỏu v cỏch xỏc nh nghiờn cu, phng phỏp nghiờn cK cu, xỏc nh kt cu cho ti, trỡnh by kt qu v hon thnh ti tt nghip ca mỡnh h Cui cựng, em xin by t lũng cm n sõu sc n gia ỡnh v bn bố ó luụn bờn cnh, h tr v ng viờn em hon thnh tt khoỏ lun ca mỡnh Hu, thỏng 05/2014 Sinh viờn thc hin Nguyn Tuyt Trinh Tr ng i Em xin chõn thnh cm n! SVTH: NGUYN TUYT TRINH GVHD: TS TRN TH BCH NGC TI: PHN TCH NH HNG CA CC NHN T KINH T V Mễ N TTCK VIT NAM MC LC PHN I: M U 1 Tng quan tỡnh hỡnh nghiờn cu v nh hng ca cỏc nhõn t kinh t v mụ n th trng chng khoỏn u Lý thc hin ti Mc tiờu nghiờn cu .5 t H i tng, phm vi nghiờn cu Phng phỏp nghiờn cu .7 PHN 2: NI DUNG V KT QU NGHIấN CU .8 h CHNG 1: TNG QUAN V NH HNG CA CC BIN KINH T V in Mễ N TH TRNG CHNG KHON .8 1.1 Cỏc nhõn t nh hng ti giỏ c phiu cK 1.1.1 Nhõn t c bn 1.1.2 Nhõn t v mụ h 1.2 nh hng ca cỏc nhõn t v mụ n giỏ c phiu trờn th trng chng khoỏn 10 1.2.1 Ch s giỏ tiờu dựng 10 1.2.2 Lói sut .11 i 1.2.3 T giỏ hi oỏi .12 1.2.4 Cung tin M2 .13 1.2.5 Giỏ du thụ 13 ng 1.2.6 Giỏ vng .14 1.2.7 Sn lng cụng nghip 15 1.3 Vai trũ, ý ngha ca vic nghiờn cu s nh hng ca cỏc nhõn t kinh t v mụ n th trng chng khoỏn 15 Tr 1.4 Tng quan v phng phỏp nghiờn cu: 16 1.4.1 Tớnh dng 17 1.4.1.1 Chui thi gian .17 1.4.1.2 Khỏi nim tớnh dng 17 1.4.1.3 Cỏch kim nh tớnh dng ca chui thi gian 17 1.4.1.4 Nhiu trng 19 SVTH: NGUYN TUYT TRINH GVHD: TS TRN TH BCH NGC TI: PHN TCH NH HNG CA CC NHN T KINH T V Mễ N TTCK VIT NAM 1.4.1.5 Bin i chui khụng dng thnh chui dng 19 1.4.2 c lng mi quan h di hn 19 1.4.2.1 Phõn tớch hi quy 19 1.4.2.2 c lng phng trỡnh hi quy 20 u 1.4.2.3 Cỏc gi thit c bn ca phng phỏp bỡnh phng nh nht .20 1.4.3 Kim nh ng liờn kt (Kim nh Engle - Granger) 21 t H 1.4.4 Mụ hỡnh hiu chnh sai s ECM (Error Correct Model) 22 1.4.5 Kim nh nhõn qu hai bin Granger 23 1.4.5.1 Lý lun c bn ca Granger kim nh mi nhõn qu 23 h 1.4.5.2 iu kin ca kim nh nhõn qu Granger .24 in 1.4.5.3 Thc hin kim nh nhõn qu Granger 24 CHNG 2: PHN TCH NH HNG CA CC NHN T KINH T V cK Mễ N TH TRNG CHNG KHON VIT NAM 25 2.1 Thc trng tỡnh hỡnh kinh t v mụ v th trng chng khoỏn Vit Nam 25 2.1.1 Tỡnh hỡnh kinh t v mụ v th trng chng khoỏn giai on 1/2009 h 6/2010: Nhanh chúng phc hi sau khng hong .25 2.1.2 Tỡnh hỡnh kinh t v mụ v th trng chng khoỏn giai on 7/2010 i 12/2011: Ri lon v nhiu bt cp 27 2.1.3 Tỡnh hỡnh kinh t v mụ v th trng chng khoỏn giai on 1/2012 7/2013: K vng vo s n nh v nhng tớn hiu tớch cc 30 ng 2.2.1 D liu nghiờn cu 33 2.2.1.1 Ngun d liu 33 2.2.1.2 Phõn tớch thng kờ mụ t 34 2.2.1.3 Kim nh tớnh dng .35 Tr 2.2.2 Phõn tớch s nh hng ca cỏc nhõn t kinh t v mụ n th trng chng khoỏn di hn .36 2.2.2.1 c lng mụ hỡnh vi chui d liu ca tt c cỏc bin 36 2.2.2.2.Kim tra a cng tuyn 37 2.2.2.3 Hiu chnh mụ hỡnh 38 2.2.2.3.1 Loi b mt s bin cú tng quan cht ch vi 38 SVTH: NGUYN TUYT TRINH GVHD: TS TRN TH BCH NGC TI: PHN TCH NH HNG CA CC NHN T KINH T V Mễ N TTCK VIT NAM 2.2.2.3.2 Hi quy mụ hỡnh sau ó loi b cỏc bin khụng phự hp .39 2.2.2.3.3 Khc phc t tng quan theo phng phỏp Cochrane - Orcutt40 2.2.2.3.4 Kim nh Engle Granger: 40 2.2.3 Xỏc nh nh hng ca cỏc nhõn t kinh t v mụ n th trng chng u khoỏn ngn hn 41 2.2.3.1 La chn tr ti u cho mụ hỡnh .41 t H 2.2.3.2 c lng mụ hỡnh hiu chnh sai s 42 2.2.4 Kim nh quan h nhõn qu Granger 43 2.2.4.1 La chn tr ti u 43 h 2.2.4.2 Kim nh nhõn qu Granger hai bin 44 in CHNG 3: THO LUN KT QU 45 3.1 Mt s kt lun rỳt t s nh hng di hn ca cỏc nhõn t cK kinh t v mụ n th trng chng khoỏn .45 3.2 Mt s kt lun rỳt t s nh hng ca cỏc nhõn t kinh t v mụ n h th trng chng khoỏn ngn hn 47 3.3 M rng v tho lun v kt qu .49 PHN 3: KT LUN 53 i Kt lun úng gúp ca nghiờn cu 53 Khuyn ngh 54 2.1 i vi Chớnh ph 54 ng 2.2 i vi nh u t 55 Hn ch ca nghiờn cu .56 Hng phỏt trin ca ti 56 DANH MC TI LIU THAM KHO 58 Tr PH LC SVTH: NGUYN TUYT TRINH GVHD: TS TRN TH BCH NGC TI: PHN TCH NH HNG CA CC NHN T KINH T V Mễ N TTCK VIT NAM DANH MC CC CH CI VIT TT VIT TT NGUYấN VN Doanh nghip ECM Error Correction Model Mụ hỡnh hiu chnh sai s HOSE S Giao dch Chng khoỏn Thnh ph H Chớ Minh NT Nh u t NHNN Ngõn hng Nh nc NHTM Ngõn hng thng mi OLS Ordinary Least Squares Phng phỏp bỡnh phng nh nht t H u DN h thụng thng Th trng chng khoỏn VAR Vector Autoregression T hi quy vector VECM Vector Error Correction Model Mụ hỡnh vector hiu chnh sai s Tr ng i h cK in TTCK SVTH: NGUYN TUYT TRINH GVHD: TS TRN TH BCH NGC TI: PHN TCH NH HNG CA CC NHN T KINH T V Mễ N TTCK VIT NAM DANH MC CC BNG BIU STT TấN BNG TRANG Cỏc bin, kớ hiu, n v v ngun d liu 35 Bng 2.2 Thng kờ mụ t cho cỏc chui s liu nghiờn cu 36 Bng 2.3 Kim nh Unit Root ADF cho cỏc chui s liu 37 Bng 2.4 Hi quy nh hng ca cỏc nhõn t kinh t v mụ n 38 t H ch s giỏ c phiu u Bng 2.1 Bng 2.5 H s tng quan gia cỏc bin c lp mụ hỡnh 39 Bng 2.6 Giỏ tr P - value v h s R2 ca mụ hỡnh hi quy tng 40 c lng nh hng ca cỏc nhõn t kinh t v mụ n in Bng 2.7 h bin c lp theo cỏc bin c lp khỏc Kim nh White 41 Bng 2.9 Kim nh Breusch-Godfrey i vi phn d 42 Bng 2.10 Khc phc t tng quan bng phng phỏp C O 42 Bng 2.11 Kim nh Engle Granger kim tra tớnh dng ca 42 phn d Phng trỡnh mụ t nh hng ca cỏc bin kinh t v i Bng 2.12 h Bng 2.8 cK ch s giỏ c phiu 41 43 mụ n ch s giỏ c phiu di hn Bng la chn tr ti u thụng qua mụ hỡnh VAR 43 Bng 2.14 Kt qu c lng mụ hỡnh ngn hn 44 Bng 2.15 Phng trỡnh mụ t nh hng ca cỏc bin kinh t v 45 ng Bng 2.13 Tr Bng 2.16 Bng 2.17 mụ n ch s giỏ c phiu ngn hn nh sau: Kt qu xỏc nh tr ti u theo tiờu chun AIC 45 (hng trờn) v SIC (hng di) Bng tng hp mi quan h nhõn qu gia VN - Index 46 v cỏc bin SVTH: NGUYN TUYT TRINH GVHD: TS TRN TH BCH NGC TI: PHN TCH NH HNG CA CC NHN T KINH T V Mễ N TTCK VIT NAM DANH MC CC S , HèNH V STT TấN HèNH, S TRANG Mụ hỡnh nghiờn cu xut 17 Hỡnh 2.1 Bin ng ca cỏc bin kinh t v mụ v ch s giỏ 28 c phiu VN Index giai on 1/2009 6/2010 Hỡnh 2.2 Bin ng ca cỏc bin kinh t v mụ v ch s giỏ Hỡnh 2.3 30 t H c phiu VN Index giai on 7/2010 12/2011 u S 1.4 Bin ng ca cỏc bin kinh t v mụ v ch s giỏ 33 Tr ng i h cK in h c phiu VN Index giai on 1/2012 7/2013 SVTH: NGUYN TUYT TRINH GVHD: TS TRN TH BCH NGC TI: PHN TCH NH HNG CA CC NHN T KINH T V Mễ N TTCK VIT NAM PHN I: M U Tng quan tỡnh hỡnh nghiờn cu v nh hng ca cỏc nhõn t kinh t v mụ n th trng chng khoỏn TTCK úng vai trũ quan trng i vi s phỏt trin ca nn kinh t ca mt u quc gia Th trng ny giỳp NT n gn hn vi DN, qua ú DN cú c hi tip cn vi ngun ln, m rng sn xut kinh doanh, phỏt trin bn vng Giỏ c t H chng khoỏn l hỡnh nh phn chiu nhng c bn ca nn kinh t v mụ, c bit l sc khe ca DN Giỏ c chng khoỏn phn ng vi cỏc tin tc hm cha nhiu s kin bt ng m chỳng ta khú oỏn trc c õy cng l mt i lng ngu nhiờn m ngi ta khụng th nh lng c mt cỏch chc chn, mc dự thụng tin in h c hp th mt cỏch nhanh chúng Vỡ vy giỏ c chng khoỏn núi riờng v TTCK núi chung luụn l c cỏc nh nghiờn cu quan tõm tỡm hiu qua nhiu cK th k Nm 1970, Fama a "Lý thuyt th trng hiu qu" hay "Gi thuyt th trng hiu qu" (Efficient Market Hypothesis - EMH) ó t c s lý thuyt cc h k quan trng Theo ú, cỏc nh lm chớnh sỏch cú th t thi hnh cỏc chớnh sỏch v ca TTCK i mụ quc gia m khụng cn phi lo s rng cỏc chớnh sỏch ny s lm thay i bn cht Tuy nhiờn thc tin nghiờn cu trờn th gii cho thy TTCK l mt b phn cu thnh th trng ti chớnh nờn nú b chi phi trc tip t nhng bin c phỏt trin ng lnh mnh hoc gp ri ro cú th xy trờn th trng ti chớnh Do vy, cỏc nhõn t v mụ nh chu k phỏt trin kinh t, lm phỏt, gim phỏt, lói sut, t giỏ u nh hng n giỏ chng khoỏn Nu TTCK tng trng mnh, dũng tin t cỏc kờnh u t khỏc cú xu hng vo th trng cng ln v ngc li Vỡ vy lý thuyt th Tr trng hiu qu rt khú t c 1.1 Thc tin nghiờn cu nc ngoi tỏc gi Chen Roll Ross (1986) ó xem xột nhõn t chớnh trờn th trng M Kt qu cho thy mt vi bin kinh t ny c chng minh l cú ý ngha trong vic gii thớch t sut sinh li k vng, c bit l sn lng cụng nghip, bin ng phn bự ri ro, ng cong li sut; mt vi bin yu hn nh s o lng SVTH: NGUYN TUYT TRINH GVHD: TS TRN TH BCH NGC TI: PHN TCH NH HNG CA CC NHN T KINH T V Mễ N TTCK VIT NAM lm phỏt bt thng v nhng thay i lm phỏt kỡ vng nhng thi kỡ cỏc bin ny bt n cao Bn thõn lói sut khụng phi l nhõn t tỏc ng nhng chờnh lch t sut sinh li v s khỏc bit v mc ri ro thỡ nh hng n t sut sinh li c phn u Kwon, Shin v Bacon (1997) ó tỡm bng chng thuyt phc bng cỏch s dng kim nh nhõn qu Granger v mụ hỡnh vector hiu chnh sai s (VECM) cho t H thy TTCK Hn Quc nhy cm vi nn kinh t thc v hot ng thng mi quc t hn ch s chng khoỏn M v Nht, c th hin qua cỏc bin t giỏ, cỏn cõn thng mi, cung tin v ch s sn lng cụng nghip Muradoglu, Taskin, v Bigan (2000) ó nghiờn cu mi quan h gia t sut in h sinh li ca 19 th trng mi ni vi t giỏ, lói sut, lm phỏt v sn lng cụng nghip Kt qu cho thy mi quan h gia t sut sinh li th trng v cỏc bin kinh cK t v mụ tựy thuc vo quy mụ ca tng th trng v úng gúp ca nú vo th trng quc t Maysami v Koh (2000) a kt lun l ch s TTCK Singapore v ch s h ngnh bt ng sn hỡnh thnh mi quan h ng tớch hp vi tt c cỏc bin s kinh t c la chn gm lói sut ngn hn, di hn, sn lng cụng nghip, lm phỏt, t giỏ i v cung tin Riờng i vi ch s ti chớnh, hot ng kinh t thc v cung tin thỡ s liờn h khụng ỏng k Ibrahim & Yusoff (2001) nghiờn cu ti Malaysia ó ch rng giỏ chng ng khoỏn dng nh chu nhiu tỏc ng hn t nhng thay i ca cỏc nhõn t mang tớnh ni a, in hỡnh l cung tin c bit, cung tin mang li mt hiu ng dng cho giỏ chng khoỏn ngn hn, nhng li tỏc ng ngc chiu nu xột di hn T giỏ hi oỏi tỏc ng nghch chiu ti giỏ chng khoỏn di hn; cũn sn Tr lng cụng nghip v lm phỏt thỡ mang ti hiu ng dng di hn Diacogiannis, Tsiritakis v Manolas (2001) ó tỡm thy mi quan h cht ch gia 13 18 bin kinh t v mụ c la chn nghiờn cu vi t sut sinh li ca TTCK Hy Lp Udegbunam & Eriki (2001) nghiờn cu trờn TTCK Nigeria cho kt qu bin v mụ c chn quan sỏt, ch bin lm phỏt cú quan h ngc chiu vi giỏ c phiu SVTH: NGUYN TUYT TRINH GVHD: TS TRN TH BCH NGC TI: PHN TCH NH HNG CA CC NHN T KINH T V Mễ N TTCK VIT NAM Test critical values: 1% level -3.557472 5% level -2.916566 10% level -2.596116 u *MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values Null Hypothesis: LIG has a unit root t H Exogenous: Constant Lag Length: (Automatic - based on SIC, maxlag=10) Prob.* Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -2.802184 0.0646 Test critical values: 1% level -3.557472 5% level -2.916566 in cK 10% level h t-Statistic -2.596116 h *MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values Null Hypothesis: DLIG has a unit root i Exogenous: Constant Lag Length: (Automatic - based on SIC, maxlag=10) Prob.* Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -5.071080 0.0001 Test critical values: 1% level -3.557472 5% level -2.916566 10% level -2.596116 Tr ng t-Statistic *MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values PH LC 1.7 Sn lng cụng nghip Null Hypothesis: IP has a unit root Exogenous: Constant SVTH: NGUYN TUYT TRINH GVHD: TS TRN TH BCH NGC TI: PHN TCH NH HNG CA CC NHN T KINH T V Mễ N TTCK VIT NAM Lag Length: (Automatic - based on SIC, maxlag=10) Prob.* Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic 0.843836 0.9939 Test critical values: 1% level -3.560019 5% level -2.917650 10% level -2.596689 t H u t-Statistic *MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values Exogenous: Constant in Lag Length: (Automatic - based on SIC, maxlag=10) h Null Hypothesis: LIP has a unit root Prob.* Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -0.028325 0.9514 Test critical values: 1% level -3.560019 h cK t-Statistic -2.917650 10% level -2.596689 i 5% level *MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values Null Hypothesis: DLIP has a unit root ng Exogenous: Constant Lag Length: (Automatic - based on SIC, maxlag=10) Prob.* Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -10.22311 0.0000 Test critical values: 1% level -3.557472 5% level -2.916566 10% level -2.596116 Tr t-Statistic *MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values SVTH: NGUYN TUYT TRINH GVHD: TS TRN TH BCH NGC TI: PHN TCH NH HNG CA CC NHN T KINH T V Mễ N TTCK VIT NAM PH LC 1.8 Ch s giỏ c phiu VN - Index Prob.* Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -2.538915 0.1122 Test critical values: 1% level 5% level 10% level -3.557472 -2.916566 -2.596116 t H t-Statistic cK in h *MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values Null Hypothesis: LVNI has a unit root Exogenous: Constant Lag Length: (Automatic - based on SIC, maxlag=10) u Null Hypothesis: VNI has a unit root Exogenous: Constant Lag Length: (Automatic - based on SIC, maxlag=10) Prob.* -2.607198 0.0978 h Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic t-Statistic i Test critical values: 1% level 5% level 10% level -3.557472 -2.916566 -2.596116 *MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values ng Null Hypothesis: DLVNI has a unit root Exogenous: Constant Lag Length: (Automatic - based on SIC, maxlag=10) Prob.* Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -6.084583 0.0000 Test critical values: -3.557472 -2.916566 -2.596116 Tr t-Statistic 1% level 5% level 10% level *MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values SVTH: NGUYN TUYT TRINH GVHD: TS TRN TH BCH NGC TI: PHN TCH NH HNG CA CC NHN T KINH T V Mễ N TTCK VIT NAM PH LC 2: XC NH NH HNG CA CC NHN T KINH T V Mễ N TH TRNG CHNG KHON TRONG DI HN PH LC 2.1: c lng phng trỡnh hi quy ban u Dependent Variable: LVNI Included observations: 55 Coefficient Std Error t-Statistic Prob LCPI -1.953701 LINT 0.094527 LEX -2.043285 LM2 1.239537 0.266327 4.654195 LOP 1.158361 0.143414 8.077071 0.0000 LIG -0.096467 0.198887 -2.496229 0.0161 LIP 0.005788 0.172256 0.033600 0.0733 C -9.764625 7.255312 -1.345859 0.1848 t H Variable 0.0009 0.152957 0.617996 0.0396 0.860062 -2.375742 0.0216 h 0.548658 -3.560874 h cK in 0.0000 0.777157 Mean dependent var 6.089493 Adjusted R-squared 0.743968 S.D dependent var 0.164854 S.E of regression 0.083415 Akaike info criterion -1.996249 Sum squared resid 0.327031 Schwarz criterion Log likelihood 62.89684 Hannan-Quinn criter -1.883339 F-statistic 23.41589 Durbin-Watson stat ng i R-squared -1.704273 0.900983 0.000000 Prob(F-statistic) u Method: Least Squares Tr PH LC 2.2: Xỏc nh mi quan h gia tng bin c lp vi cỏc bin c lp khỏc Dependent Variable: LCPI Method: Least Squares Included observations: 55 SVTH: NGUYN TUYT TRINH GVHD: TS TRN TH BCH NGC TI: PHN TCH NH HNG CA CC NHN T KINH T V Mễ N TTCK VIT NAM Coefficient LINT -0.141716 LEX 1.062682 LM2 -0.012857 LOP Std Error t-Statistic Prob 0.0002 0.166333 6.388896 0.0000 0.070039 -0.183562 0.8551 0.038998 0.037306 1.045360 0.3011 LIG 0.155775 0.047245 3.297204 0.0018 LIP 0.080822 0.043789 1.845730 0.0711 C -6.845557 1.633031 -4.191934 0.0001 t H 0.034652 -4.089681 0.951781 Mean dependent var 5.231476 Adjusted R-squared 0.911331 S.D dependent var 0.151423 S.E of regression 0.021944 Akaike info criterion -4.682199 Sum squared resid 0.023115 Schwarz criterion Log likelihood 135.7605 Hannan-Quinn criter -4.583403 F-statistic 420.5263 Durbin-Watson stat Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000 -4.426720 0.577409 i h cK in h R-squared Dependent Variable: LINT u Variable Method: Least Squares Variable Std Error t-Statistic Prob LEX 2.019699 0.757433 2.666506 0.0104 LM2 -0.203364 0.249599 -0.814765 0.4192 LOP 0.418455 0.121106 3.455275 0.0012 LIG 0.906479 0.134553 6.736961 0.0000 LIP -0.416729 0.151011 -2.759600 0.0082 C -5.915892 6.793006 -0.870880 0.3882 LCPI -1.823408 0.445856 -4.089681 0.0002 Tr ng Coefficient Included observations: 55 R-squared 0.917811 SVTH: NGUYN TUYT TRINH Mean dependent var -0.170596 GVHD: TS TRN TH BCH NGC TI: PHN TCH NH HNG CA CC NHN T KINH T V Mễ N TTCK VIT NAM Adjusted R-squared 0.907537 S.D dependent var 0.258864 S.E of regression 0.078715 Akaike info criterion -2.127563 Sum squared resid 0.297407 Schwarz criterion Log likelihood 65.50798 Hannan-Quinn criter -2.028767 F-statistic 89.33653 Durbin-Watson stat Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000 -1.872084 t H u 0.780413 Dependent Variable: LEX Method: Least Squares Std Error t-Statistic LM2 0.136982 0.040085 3.417309 0.0013 LOP -0.001505 0.024067 -0.062516 LIG 0.000406 0.033378 0.012159 0.9903 LIP -0.076759 cK 0.9504 0.026701 -2.874750 0.0060 C 3.640949 1.098354 3.314914 0.0018 LCPI 0.432461 0.067690 6.388896 0.0000 LINT 0.063880 0.023957 2.666506 0.0104 0.973743 Mean dependent var 9.874641 Adjusted R-squared 0.970461 S.D dependent var 0.081451 S.E of regression 0.013999 Akaike info criterion -5.581257 Sum squared resid 0.009407 Schwarz criterion Log likelihood 160.4846 Hannan-Quinn criter -5.482462 F-statistic 296.6845 Durbin-Watson stat Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000 Tr i ng R-squared Prob in Coefficient h Variable h Included observations: 55 -5.325779 0.963729 Dependent Variable: LM2 SVTH: NGUYN TUYT TRINH GVHD: TS TRN TH BCH NGC TI: PHN TCH NH HNG CA CC NHN T KINH T V Mễ N TTCK VIT NAM Method: Least Squares t-Statistic Prob LOP 0.128830 0.075467 1.707104 0.0943 LIG -0.051624 0.107530 -0.480085 0.6333 LIP 0.411007 0.072083 5.701899 0.0000 C 16.68714 3.108031 5.369040 0.0000 LCPI -0.054563 0.297244 -0.183562 0.8551 LINT -0.067079 0.082329 -0.814765 0.4192 LEX 1.428537 0.418030 0.0013 R-squared 0.971506 Mean dependent var Adjusted R-squared 0.967944 S.D dependent var 0.252495 S.E of regression 0.045207 Akaike info criterion -3.236698 Sum squared resid 0.098098 Schwarz criterion Log likelihood 96.00920 Hannan-Quinn criter -3.137902 F-statistic 272.7562 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000 35.44434 h cK in 3.417309 u Std Error Durbin-Watson stat -2.981219 0.679278 i Variable t H Coefficient h Included observations: 55 Dependent Variable: LOP Method: Least Squares Variable Std Error t-Statistic Prob LIG 0.012453 0.200160 0.062214 0.9507 LIP 0.081984 0.172962 0.474002 0.6376 C -14.61791 6.990588 -2.091085 0.0418 LCPI 0.570779 0.546012 1.045360 0.3011 LINT 0.476000 0.137760 3.455275 0.0012 LEX -0.054112 0.865568 -0.062516 0.9504 LM2 0.444289 0.260259 0.0943 Tr Coefficient ng Included observations: 55 SVTH: NGUYN TUYT TRINH 1.707104 GVHD: TS TRN TH BCH NGC TI: PHN TCH NH HNG CA CC NHN T KINH T V Mễ N TTCK VIT NAM R-squared 0.916054 Mean dependent var 4.501822 Adjusted R-squared 0.905560 S.D dependent var 0.273185 S.E of regression 0.083953 Akaike info criterion -1.998714 Sum squared resid 0.338306 Schwarz criterion Log likelihood 61.96464 Hannan-Quinn criter -1.899918 F-statistic 87.29899 Durbin-Watson stat Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000 t H 0.496591 Dependent Variable: LIG h Method: Least Squares in Included observations: 55 Std Error LIP 0.265119 0.119010 2.227704 0.0306 C 0.002536 5.265383 0.000482 0.9996 LCPI 1.185466 0.359537 3.297204 0.0018 LINT 0.536149 0.079583 6.736961 0.0000 LEX 0.007589 0.624170 0.012159 0.9903 0.192818 -0.480085 0.6333 0.006475 0.104075 0.9507 0.961632 Mean dependent var 5.936203 Adjusted R-squared 0.956836 S.D dependent var 0.291380 S.E of regression 0.060537 Akaike info criterion -2.652719 Sum squared resid 0.175906 Schwarz criterion Log likelihood 79.94977 Hannan-Quinn criter -2.553923 F-statistic 200.5082 Durbin-Watson stat Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000 LOP -0.092569 Tr ng R-squared i LM2 t-Statistic cK Coefficient h Variable u -1.743235 0.062214 Prob -2.397240 0.637493 Dependent Variable: LIP Method: Least Squares Included observations: 55 SVTH: NGUYN TUYT TRINH GVHD: TS TRN TH BCH NGC TI: PHN TCH NH HNG CA CC NHN T KINH T V Mễ N TTCK VIT NAM Coefficient C -11.31075 LCPI 0.819946 LINT Std Error t-Statistic Prob 0.0593 0.444239 1.845730 0.0711 -0.328582 0.119069 -2.759600 0.0082 LEX -1.913547 0.665639 -2.874750 0.0060 LM2 0.982496 0.172310 5.701899 0.0000 LOP 0.056828 0.119889 0.474002 0.6376 LIG 0.353430 0.158652 2.227704 0.0306 R-squared 0.962054 Mean dependent var 11.31701 Adjusted R-squared 0.957311 S.D dependent var 0.338293 S.E of regression 0.069896 Akaike info criterion -2.365214 Sum squared resid 0.234499 Schwarz criterion Log likelihood 72.04337 Hannan-Quinn criter -2.266418 F-statistic 202.8281 Durbin-Watson stat Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000 -2.109735 1.375907 i h cK in h t H 5.856098 -1.931448 u Variable PH LC 2.3: Hi quy mụ hỡnh sau ó loi b cỏc bin khụng phự hp Dependent Variable: LVNI Method: Least Squares ng Included observations: 55 Tr Variable Coefficient Std Error t-Statistic Prob LCPI -3.411669 0.343624 -9.928496 0.0000 LINT -0.313563 0.086274 -3.634516 0.0007 LM2 1.033303 0.212282 4.867602 0.0000 LOP 1.160757 0.155125 7.482728 0.0000 C -17.96620 5.927112 -3.031190 0.0039 R-squared 0.818195 SVTH: NGUYN TUYT TRINH Mean dependent var 6.089493 GVHD: TS TRN TH BCH NGC TI: PHN TCH NH HNG CA CC NHN T KINH T V Mễ N TTCK VIT NAM Adjusted R-squared 0.790551 S.D dependent var 0.164854 S.E of regression 0.090565 Akaike info criterion -1.878984 Sum squared resid 0.410103 Schwarz criterion Log likelihood 56.67207 Hannan-Quinn criter -1.808416 F-statistic 32.23083 Durbin-Watson stat Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000 -1.696499 Tr ng i h cK in h t H u 0.822102 SVTH: NGUYN TUYT TRINH GVHD: TS TRN TH BCH NGC TI: PHN TCH NH HNG CA CC NHN T KINH T V Mễ N TTCK VIT NAM PH LC 3: XC NH NH HNG CA CC NHN T KINH T V Mễ N TH TRNG CHNG KHON TRONG NGN HN PH LC 3.1: La chn tr ti u u VAR Lag Order Selection Criteria Endogenous variables: LVNI LCPI LM2 LOP LIG LIP Included observations: 51 t H Exogenous variables: C LogL LR FPE AIC 322.0016 NA 1.67e-13 -12.39222 677.9186 614.1313* 6.02e-19* -24.93799* -23.34707* -24.33005* 703.6668 38.36987 9.53e-19 737.8650 42.91539 1.20e-18 784.2343 47.27845 HQ -12.16495 -12.30537 in -24.53595 -21.58140 -23.40693 -24.46530 -20.14710 -22.81518 -24.87193 -19.19009 -22.70073 cK 1.11e-18 SC h Lag h * indicates lag order selected by the criterion LR: sequential modified LR test statistic (each test at 5% level) FPE: Final prediction error i AIC: Akaike information criterion SC: Schwarz information criterion ng HQ: Hannan-Quinn information criterion PH LC 3.2: c lng mụ hỡnh ECM Dependent Variable: DLVNI Tr Method: Least Squares Date: 04/21/14 Time: 17:23 Sample (adjusted): 2009M02 2013M07 Included observations: 54 after adjustments Variable Coefficient SVTH: NGUYN TUYT TRINH Std Error t-Statistic Prob GVHD: TS TRN TH BCH NGC 0.041793 0.024326 1.718001 0.0930 DLVNI1 0.305175 0.128864 2.368192 0.0224 DLCPI -2.495275 1.705314 -1.463235 0.1507 DLM2 0.131694 0.595608 0.221108 0.8261 DLOP 0.489510 0.164288 2.979582 0.0047 DLINT -0.190932 0.194955 -0.979365 0.3329 DLCPI1 -1.843088 1.449588 -1.271457 0.2104 DLM21 -0.147232 0.597372 -0.246465 0.8065 DLOP1 -0.496291 0.193442 -2.565585 0.0139 DLINT1 0.386996 0.176837 2.188436 0.0341 ECM(-1) -0.646669 0.134220 -4.817983 0.0000 R-squared 0.554719 Mean dependent var h t H C u TI: PHN TCH NH HNG CA CC NHN T KINH T V Mễ N TTCK VIT NAM Adjusted R-squared 0.451165 S.D dependent var 0.082772 S.E of regression 0.061321 Akaike info criterion -2.565780 Sum squared resid 0.161689 Schwarz criterion Log likelihood 80.27607 Hannan-Quinn criter -2.409525 F-statistic 5.356822 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000042 h cK in 0.008961 2.046895 Tr ng i Durbin-Watson stat -2.160617 SVTH: NGUYN TUYT TRINH GVHD: TS TRN TH BCH NGC TI: PHN TCH NH HNG CA CC NHN T KINH T V Mễ N TTCK VIT NAM PH LC 4: KIM NH NHN QU GRANGER HAI BIN PH LC 4.1 Mi quan h gia ch s VN Index v Ch s giỏ tiờu dựng Pairwise Granger Causality Tests Obs F-Statistic LCPI does not Granger Cause LVNI 53 LVNI does not Granger Cause LCPI Prob 2.54987 0.0675 0.08688 0.9169 t H Null Hypothesis: u Lags: h PH LC 4.2 Mi quan h gia ch s VN Index v Lói sut tin gi ca cỏc in NHTM Pairwise Granger Causality Tests Null Hypothesis: cK Lags: Obs F-Statistic 52 h LINT does not Granger Cause LVNI 2.64845 0.0603 1.04704 0.3810 i LVNI does not Granger Cause LINT Prob PH LC 4.3 Mi quan h gia ch s VN Index v T giỏ hi oỏi Pairwise Granger Causality Tests ng Lags: Null Hypothesis: LEX does not Granger Cause LVNI 52 Prob 0.83010 0.3665 1.51533 0.2234 Tr LVNI does not Granger Cause LEX Obs F-Statistic SVTH: NGUYN TUYT TRINH GVHD: TS TRN TH BCH NGC TI: PHN TCH NH HNG CA CC NHN T KINH T V Mễ N TTCK VIT NAM PH LC 4.4 Mi quan h gia ch s VN Index v Cung tin M2 Pairwise Granger Causality Tests Obs F-Statistic LM2 does not Granger Cause LVNI 52 LVNI does not Granger Cause LM2 Prob 2.64145 0.0608 1.52396 0.2212 t H Null Hypothesis: u Lags: PH LC 4.5 Mi quan h gia ch s VN Index v Giỏ du th gii h Pairwise Granger Causality Tests in Lags: Obs F-Statistic 54 h LOP does not Granger Cause LVNI cK Null Hypothesis: 2.70885 0.0562 0.54895 0.4621 i LVNI does not Granger Cause LOP Prob PH LC 4.6 Mi quan h gia ch s VN Index v Ch s giỏ vng nc Pairwise Granger Causality Tests ng Lags: Null Hypothesis: LIG does not Granger Cause LVNI 52 Prob 1.90722 0.1596 0.92229 0.4378 Tr LVNI does not Granger Cause LIG Obs F-Statistic SVTH: NGUYN TUYT TRINH GVHD: TS TRN TH BCH NGC TI: PHN TCH NH HNG CA CC NHN T KINH T V Mễ N TTCK VIT NAM PH LC 4.7 Mi quan h gia ch s VN Index v Sn lng sn xut cụng nghip Pairwise Granger Causality Tests Obs F-Statistic LIP does not Granger Cause LVNI 53 0.65546 0.5238 0.80812 0.4517 Tr ng i h cK in h LVNI does not Granger Cause LIP Prob t H Null Hypothesis: u Lags: SVTH: NGUYN TUYT TRINH GVHD: TS TRN TH BCH NGC

Ngày đăng: 19/10/2016, 15:58

Từ khóa liên quan

Tài liệu cùng người dùng

  • Đang cập nhật ...

Tài liệu liên quan