THE ROLE OF SURGERY IN HEART FAILURE - part 7 pot

1 230 0
THE ROLE OF SURGERY IN HEART FAILURE - part 7 pot

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Thông tin tài liệu

31%, P!.05). Migrino and colleagues [159] inves- tigated the outcomes of the Global Use of SK and TPA for Occluded Coronary Arteries-1 trial and showed that even with early opening of the IRA (within 3 hours), a significant number of patients (17%) had elevated LV ESV (LVESVIO40 mL/ m 2 ). Early dilatation after AMI even after success- ful reperfusion therapy strongly predicted early and late mortality. The optimal timing of surgical revasculariza- tion after AMI is controversial. Historically, emergent CABG after AMI had higher mortality 5% to 30%, with especially poor prognosis in patients who had transmural (TM) infarcts [160,161]. However, early studies comparing CABG to medical treatment showed that surgical revascularization within 6 hours of symptom on- set improved mortality over medically treated nonrevascularized patients. DeWood and col- leagues [162] retrospectively studied 440 patients who had TM AMI. Starting CPB within 6 hours of AMI decreased short-term and long-term mor- tality and improved late event free survival. Hos- pital mortality for non-TM MI was 3.1% and for TM MI was 5.2%. Mortality for CABG within 6 hours was 3.8% versus 8.5% for CABG after 6 hours. However, the average patient age was 54 with mostly single and double vessel disease, exposing the study to criticism of selection bias. Main predictors of death were age, prior CABG, and shock. Today’s environment is different. The popula- tion is older, multivessel disease is prevalent, and safe alternatives such as thrombolysis and PTCA exist. The capabilities of PCI are improving. A recent study of the New York State cardiac sur- gery registry investigated the effect of timing in CABG after TM AMI with the goal of delineating the optimal timing in this population as part of a strategy to improve outcome after AMI. This was a retrospective multicenter analysis of 32,099 patients after CABG after TM AMI from 1991 to 1996 by 179 surgeons at 33 hospitals in New York State [163]. The average age was 65 with EF 46%. Overall mortality CABG after TM AMI was 3.3%. Mortality decreased as time between the MI and surgery increased (Table 10). Multivariate analysis of 43 risks factors showed revascularization within 3 days of TM AMI was an independent predictor of mortality. Day 3 was a point of inflection between the steep rise of mortality after early surgical intervention and the lower mortality later. After 3 days, mortality rapidly approached baseline. Although the risk does not return to baseline until day 7, there is no trend to statistical significance of added risk from day 3 to day 7. The conclusion was that aside from absolute indications for emergency surgical procedure (ie, persistent ischemia, me- chanical complications), a 3-day waiting period should be considered to allow this high-risk period to subside. The initial 3-day window is a period of heightened systemic inflammatory response with precipitously high C-reactive pro- tein [164]. Limitations of this study include lack of uniformity among surgeons, institutions, myocar- dial protection protocols, surgical techniques, CPB methods and duration, and anesthesia (Table 11). This study corroborates the current ACC/ American Heart Association guidelines of rescue PCI as primary treatment for AMI. Waiting beyond the dangerous peri-infarct period has demonstrated survival benefit. From this study, patients who had TM and non-TM AMI showed different trends in mortality over the observed time course. Mortality in the non-TM group peaked at 6 hours then declined dramatically [138]. Thus, CABG within 6 hours of non-TM AMI or within 3 days of TM AMI is associated with increased in-hospital mortality. However, pa- tients undergoing early operation likely were more unstable or in cardiogenic shock, thus artificially elevating the mortality. Because early surgical vascularization after TM AMI increases risk, aggressive cardiac sup- port including LVAD should be available. In some patients, waiting is justified to optimize surgical outcome. This requires careful patient selection, optimal timing of the operation, and Table 10 Mortality after surgery for acute myocardial infarction Overall mortality 14.2% 13.8% 7.9% 3.8% 2.9% 2.7% Time of CABG after AMI !6h 6h–1d 1–3d 4–7d 7–14d O15d Odds ratio 1.6 2 1.5 Data from Lee DC, Oz MC, Weinberg AD, et al. Appropriate timing of surgical intervention after transmural acute myocardial infarction. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;125:115–9. 195 SURGERY FOR MYOCARDIAL SALVAGE . PTCA exist. The capabilities of PCI are improving. A recent study of the New York State cardiac sur- gery registry investigated the effect of timing in CABG after TM AMI with the goal of delineating the. P!.05). Migrino and colleagues [159] inves- tigated the outcomes of the Global Use of SK and TPA for Occluded Coronary Arteries-1 trial and showed that even with early opening of the IRA (within 3 hours),. non-TM AMI showed different trends in mortality over the observed time course. Mortality in the non-TM group peaked at 6 hours then declined dramatically [138]. Thus, CABG within 6 hours of non-TM AMI

Ngày đăng: 11/08/2014, 15:20

Từ khóa liên quan

Tài liệu cùng người dùng

  • Đang cập nhật ...

Tài liệu liên quan