BioMed Central Page 1 of 4 (page number not for citation purposes) World Journal of Surgical Oncology Open Access Case report A multidisciplinary approach for the treatment of GIST liver metastasis Pejman Radkani*, Marcelo M Ghersi, Juan C Paramo and Thomas W Mesko Address: Department of Surgery, Section of Surgical Oncology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, Florida, USA Email: Pejman Radkani* - pejman_radkani@hotmail.com; Marcelo M Ghersi - mmghersi@yahoo.com; Juan C Paramo - jcparamo@msmc.com; Thomas W Mesko - dr-mesko@msmc.com * Corresponding author Abstract Background: Advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) can metastasize and recur after a long remission period, resulting in serious morbidity, mortality, and complex management issues. Case presentation: A 67-year-old woman presented with epigastric fullness, mild jaundice and weight loss with a history of a bowel resection 7 years prior for a primary GIST of the small bowel. The finding of a heterogeneous mass 15.5 cm in diameter replacing most of the left lobe of the liver by ultrasonography and CT, followed by positive cytological studies revealed a metastatic GIST. Perioperative optimization of the patient's nutritional status along with biliary drainage, and portal vein embolization were performed. Imatinib was successful in reducing the tumor size and facilitating surgical resection. Conclusion: A well-planned multidisciplinary approach should be part of the standard management of advanced or metastatic GIST. Background Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract. Despite their less aggressive pathologic nature, GISTs can metastasize and recur after a long remission period. Such cases may produce serious morbidity, mortality, and complex management issues for the treating physician. We hereby report the case of a patient who presented with an isolated metastatic GIST to the liver that was successfully treated with a multidiscipli- nary approach including imatinib therapy, portal vein embolization, and hepatic lobectomy. Case presentation A 67-year-old woman presented with epigastric fullness, mild jaundice and a 12-pound weight loss over a period of 3 months. The patient had a history of a bowel resec- tion 7 years prior to presentation for an unknown malig- nancy. On physical examination, her abdomen was soft with a palpable and non-tender mass in the mid-epigas- trium. Initial work-up including ultrasonography revealed a large liver lesion, follow-up CT confirmed the presence of a heterogeneous mass 17.5 cm in diameter replacing most of the left lobe of the liver (Figure 1a, 1b) with marked compression of the right biliary tree. Initial Liver function testes showed: total billirubin: 4, direct billirubin: 3.93, alkaline phos- phatase: 942, AST: 124, ALT: 156. The addition laboratory values were within normal limit. The patient was admitted to the hospital for additional work-up. A percutaneous transhepatic cholangiogram Published: 9 May 2008 World Journal of Surgical Oncology 2008, 6:46 doi:10.1186/1477-7819-6-46 Received: 23 October 2007 Accepted: 9 May 2008 This article is available from: http://www.wjso.com/content/6/1/46 © 2008 Radkani et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. World Journal of Surgical Oncology 2008, 6:46 http://www.wjso.com/content/6/1/46 Page 2 of 4 (page number not for citation purposes) was performed, with placement of a right biliary drainage catheter for decompression. The bilirubin and liver function tests at the day before drainage placement were as follow: total billirubin: 4 direct bil- lirubin: 3.93 ALK: 942 AST: 124 ALT: 156. Two days later the labs were as follow: total billirubin: 3.45 direct billirubin: 3.28, alkaline phosphatase: 788 AST: 117 ALT: 123, and 30 days later was: total billirubin: 0.7 direct billirubin: 0.30 alkaline phosphatase: 130 AST: 28 ALT: 25. A core liver biopsy was also done at the time, which demonstrated atypical spindle cells. Immuno-histochemical studies yielded positive CD117, vimentin and actin stains, all consistent with GIST. It was later established that the patient had pre- viously undergone a small bowel resection for a pri- mary GIST. Upper and lower endoscopy as well as small bowel series were subsequently performed. These revealed no tumors of the GI tract, suggesting the liver mass was a late and isolated metastatic man- ifestation of the prior GIST tumor. A multidisciplinary and staged treatment course was rec- ommended. Side effects and benefits of using Imatinib drug were considered by our tumor board, and the patient was started at a dose of 600 mg per day to reduce tumor size. The patient was followed regularly for the next few months as an outpatient. Her jaundice resolved and the biliary catheter was successfully removed four months after placement. A significant clinical improvement was noted, with resolution of the patient's initial symptoms and a 7-pound increase in body weight. Frequent abdom- inal CT scans showed a hepatic mass that diminished in size, but stabilized after 6 months of imatinib therapy at a diameter of 11 cm (Figure 2a, 2b). The patient then underwent portal vein embolization (PVE) in hopes of promoting hypertrophy of the right lobe and further atrophy of the tumor-laden left hepatic lobe, in preparation for surgical resection. Two months following PVE, while still on imatinib, the patient underwent an uncomplicated left hepatic lobec- tomy with cholecystectomy (Figure 3). Intraoperative ultrasonography showed a hypertrophied right liver lobe, and a 11 cm tumor involving liver segments 2, 3, 4A an 4B. Pathologic examination corroborated the diagnosis of metastatic GIST with margins of resection free of tumor. The patient tolerated the procedure well and was sent home after a 14-day hospitalization. The postoperative course was complicated by the formation of a subhepatic abscess that was successfully treated with drainage cathe- ters and systemic antibiotics. Imatinib was discontinued approximately one month after surgery for a total of one year of therapy. Follow-up CT 6 months after surgery demonstrated no residual neoplastic disease (Figure 4a, 4b). At fourteen-months follow up, the patient was found to be doing very well with no evidence of recurrent dis- ease. Discussion Gastrointestinal stromal tumors are the most common mesenchymal neoplasms of the GI tract. They have an overall incidence of 3000–5000 cases per year in the United States [1-3]. It is thought that these tumors differ- entiate from intestinal pacemaker cells, also known as interstitial cells of Cajal [1]. They affect mostly males between the ages of 50 and 70, and are usually found inci- dentally at early stages [1-4]. Large or advanced lesions may present with a variety of clinical findings, including bleeding, abdominal pain, early satiety, bowel obstruc- tion, or perforation. computerized tomography A) and B); mass in the left lobe of the liver has decreased in size with respect to the prior studyFigure 2 computerized tomography A) and B); mass in the left lobe of the liver has decreased in size with respect to the prior study. Computerized tomography A) and B); evaluation of the liver demonstrated a large inhomogeneous mass with multiple areas of cystic component within the left lobe of the liverFigure 1 Computerized tomography A) and B); evaluation of the liver demonstrated a large inhomogeneous mass with multiple areas of cystic component within the left lobe of the liver. The mass measured 17.6 × 14 cm. Mild dilatation of the int- rahepatic biliary radicals in the right lobe liver. World Journal of Surgical Oncology 2008, 6:46 http://www.wjso.com/content/6/1/46 Page 3 of 4 (page number not for citation purposes) GISTs are usually detected by endoscopy, CT or MRI per- formed for abdominal symptoms. The gold standard for diagnosing GISTs is pathological tissue examination, which normally demonstrates atypical splindle cells. A positive stain for CD117 carries a specificity of 95% for these tumors, and will unequivocally establish a diagnosis [1-7]. When GISTs originate in the small bowel, they behave in a more aggressive manner [8]. The most common site for metastases is the liver and the peritoneal cavity, but can also occur in bone, skin, soft tissues, and lymph nodes [5]. Negative prognostic factors for aggressiveness and recur- rence include tumor size, a high mitotic index, or an unknown site of origin [9,10]. Recurrence usually occurs 19–26 months after surgery [3,11,12]. For this reason, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network suggests rou- tine follow-up CT scans of the abdomen and pelvis every 3–6 month for the first 3–5 years after resection [7]. The only definitive treatment for GISTs is surgical resec- tion. This can be done laparoscopically in some cases, or with the traditional open approach. The mainstay of sur- gical therapy in primary or metastatic disease is to achieve a complete resection with negative margins [7]. Conven- tional chemotherapy and radiation therapy may have minor adjunctive benefits in unresectable or metastatic GISTs [2]. Imatinib mesylate (Gleevec ® ), a selective inhib- itor of tyrosine kinase, has revolutionized the manage- ment of this disease in recent years. Imatinib has a significant shrinking effect on GISTs, and can be used when primary GISTs have attained a very large size or are in unfavorable locations, increasing the risk of positive resection margins [1]. Imatinib has also become the first line of treatment for recurrent and/or metastatic GISTs, as described for the patient in this case report [13]. Imatinib is generally very well tolerated; and most patients can tol- erate treatment without interruption. The more common side effects of Imatinib mesylate include [14,15]: nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and muscle cramps. It is common to see a decrease in the neutrophil and platelet counts espe- cially during the first month of therapy [16]. The drug should be stopped to allow recovery if the absolute neu- trophil count (ANC) falls to <1,000/microL and/or the platelet count to <50,000/microL during the first months of therapy [17]. Our patient had no evidence of these side effects during therapy. More recently, sunitinib malate (Sutent ® ), a multikinase inhibitor has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treatment of GISTs that are refractory to imatinib [18]. Resection of GIST liver metastases may be curative when the primary disease has been eradicated and negative sur- gical resection margins are attained. However, a large tumor burden in the hepatic parenchyma may prohibit resection given the risk of insufficient remaining liver tis- sue and subsequent postoperative liver failure [19]. An option to counteract this phenomenon is the use of portal vein embolization (PVE) in cases of unilobular involve- ment of the liver. First used in the 1980s, selective PVE induces atrophy of a selected liver region as well as a com- pensatory hypertrophy of the remaining liver parenchyma [20-23]. Preoperative PVE is recommended if less than 30% to 40% of normal the liver is expected to remain and be functional after resection [24,25]. Conclusion This case, to our best knowledge, represents the first in the literature describing a multidisciplinary approach for the successful management of a large metastasic GIST to the liver. We attribute the success of this case to a well thought out management plan set forth by a dedicated tumor Computerized tomography A) and B); no evidence of meta-static diseaseFigure 4 Computerized tomography A) and B); no evidence of meta- static disease. left lobe of the liver, with falciform ligament gallbladder and xiphoid processsFigure 3 left lobe of the liver, with falciform ligament gallbladder and xiphoid process. Publish with BioMed Central and every scientist can read your work free of charge "BioMed Central will be the most significant development for disseminating the results of biomedical research in our lifetime." Sir Paul Nurse, Cancer Research UK Your research papers will be: available free of charge to the entire biomedical community peer reviewed and published immediately upon acceptance cited in PubMed and archived on PubMed Central yours — you keep the copyright Submit your manuscript here: http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/publishing_adv.asp BioMedcentral World Journal of Surgical Oncology 2008, 6:46 http://www.wjso.com/content/6/1/46 Page 4 of 4 (page number not for citation purposes) board utilizing advanced and evidence-based therapeutic modalities. Timing and resource utilization were key fac- tors in the management of this patient. Perioperative opti- mization of the patient's nutritional status and state of health with biliary drainage was helpful. The pharmaco- logic effect of imatinib reduced the tumor size and improved the surgical resectability. Additionally, PVE facilitated the operation and promoted healthy liver tissue hypertrophy. Lastly, careful operative technique and ded- icated follow up allowed for a good surgical outcome in this patient. A well-planned multidisciplinary approach should be part of the standard management of advanced or metastatic GISTs. Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Authors' contributions TM, JP and MG designed the study. PR carried out the data and bibliographic research and drafted the manuscript. MG carried out the picture acquisition, manuscript revi- sion and editing process. TM and JP did the last manu- script revision and the editing process. Acknowledgements Written consent of the patient was obtained for publication of this case report. The authors would like to thank Antonio Martinez, MD, from the depart- ment of pathology at Mount Sinai Medical Center for his help and contribu- tion in the pathology aspects of this manuscript. References 1. Gold JS, DeMatteo RP: Combined surgical and medical therapy, the gastrointestinal stromal tumor model. Ann Surg 2006, 244:176-184. 2. DeMatteo RP, Lewis JJ, Leung D, Mudan SS, Woodruff JM, Brennan MF: Two hundred gastrointestinal stromal tumors: recur- rence patterns and prognostic factors for survival. Ann Surg 2000, 231:51-58. 3. Langer C, Gunawan B, Schüler P, Huber W, Füzesi L, Becker H: Prog- nostic factors influencing surgical management and out- come of gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Br J Surg 2003, 90:332-339. 4. Miettinen M, El-Rifai W, HL Sobin L, Lasota J: Evaluation of malig- nancy and prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a review. Hum Pathol 2002, 33:478-483. 5. Miettinen M, Lasota J: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors; review on morphology, molecular pathology, prognosis, and differ- ential diagnosis. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2006, 130:1466-1478. 6. Dematteo RP, Maki RG, Antonescu C, Brennan MF: Targeted molecular therapy for cancer: the application of STI571 to gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Curr Probl Surg 2003, 40:144-193. 7. Zwan SM Van Der, Dematteo RP: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: 5 years later. Cancer 2005, 104:1781-1788. 8. DeMatteo RP: The GIST of targeted cancer therapy: a tumor, a mutated gene (c-kit), and a molecular inhibitor (STI571). Ann Surg Oncol 2002, 9:831-839. 9. Emory TS, Sobin LH, Lukes L, Lee DH, O'Leary TJ: Prognosis of gas- trointestinal smooth-muscle (stromal) tumors: dependence on anatomic site. Am J Surg Pathol 1999, 23:82-87. 10. Berman J, O'Leary TJ: Gastrointestinal stromal tumor work- shop. Hum Pathol 2001, 32:578-582. 11. Crosby JA, Catton CN, Davis A, Couture J, O'Sullivan B, Kandel R, Swallow CJ: Malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the small intestine: a review of 50 cases from a prospective data- base. Ann Surg Oncol 2001, 8:50-59. 12. Pierie JP, Choudry U, Muzikansky A, Yeap BY, Souba WW, Ott MJ: The effect of surgery and grade on outcome of gastrointesti- nal stromal tumors. Arch Surg 2001, 136:383-389. 13. Blackstein ME, Rankin C, Fletcher C, Heinrich M, Benjamin R, von Mehren M, Blanke C, Fletcher JA, Borden E, Demetri G: Clinical benefit of imatinib in patients with metastatic gastrointesti- nal stromal tumors (GIST) negative for the expression of CD117 in the S0033 trial. J Clin Oncol 2005, 23(16 suppl9010 [http://www.asco.org/portal/site/ASCO/menu item.34d60f5624ba07fd506fe310ee37a01d/ ?vgnid=76f8201eb61a7010VgnVCM100000ed730ad1RCRD&vmview tail_view&confID=34&abstractID=34173]. 14. Guilhot F: Indications for imatinib mesylate therapy and clin- ical management. Oncologist 2004, 9:271-281. 15. Schiffer CA: BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors for chronic myelogenous leukemia. N Engl J Med 2007, 357:258-265. 16. Deininger MW, O'Brien SG, Ford JM, Druker BJ: Practical manage- ment of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia receiving imatinib. J Clin Oncol 2003, 21:4255-4256. 17. Quintas-Cardama A, Kantarjian H, O'Brien S, Garcia-Manero G, Rios MB, Talpaz M, Cortes J: Granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim) may overcome imatinib-induced neutropenia in patients with chronic-phase chronic myelogenous leukemia. Cancer 2004, 100:2592-2597. 18. Maki RG: Recent advances in therapy for gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Curr Oncol Rep 2007, 9:165-169. 19. Hao CY, Ji JF: Surgical treatment of colorectal cancer: strate- gies and controversies. Eur J Surg Oncol 2006, 32:473-483. 20. Kokudo N, Makuuchi M: Current role of portal vein emboliza- tion and hepatic artery chemoembolization. Surg Clin North Am 2004, 84:643-657. 21. Jaeck D, Bachellier P, Nakano H, Oussoultzoglou E, Weber JC, Wolf P, Greget M: One or two-stage hepatectomy combined with portal vein embolization for initially nonresectable colorec- tal liver metastases. Am J Surg 2003, 185:221-229. 22. Kawasaki S, Makuuchi M, Kakazu T, Miyagawa S, Takayama T, Kosuge T, Sugihara K, Moriya Y: Resection for multiple metastatic liver tumors after portal embolization. Surgery 1994, 115:674-677. 23. de Baere T, Roche A, Elias D, Lasser P, Lagrange C, Bousson V: Pre- operative portal vein embolization for extension of hepatec- tomy. Hepatology 1996, 24:1386-1391. 24. Kubota K, Makuuchi M, Kusaka K, Kobayashi T, Miki K, Hasegawa K, Harihara Y, Takayama T: Measurement of liver volume and hepatic functional reserve as a guide to decision-making in resectional surgery for hepatic tumors. Hepatology 1997, 26:1176-1181. 25. Madoff DC, Abdalla EK, Vauthey JN: Portal vein embolization in preparation for major hepatic resection: evolution of a new standard of care. J Vasc Intrv Radiol 2005, 16:770-790. . with a history of a bowel resection 7 years prior for a primary GIST of the small bowel. The finding of a heterogeneous mass 15.5 cm in diameter replacing most of the left lobe of the liver by ultrasonography. knowledge, represents the first in the literature describing a multidisciplinary approach for the successful management of a large metastasic GIST to the liver. We attribute the success of this case to. BioMed Central Page 1 of 4 (page number not for citation purposes) World Journal of Surgical Oncology Open Access Case report A multidisciplinary approach for the treatment of GIST liver metastasis Pejman