0
  1. Trang chủ >
  2. Ngoại Ngữ >
  3. Anh ngữ phổ thông >

Unjustified Enrichment: Key Issues in Comparative Part 5 doc

Unjustified Enrichment: Key Issues in Comparative Part 5 doc

Unjustified Enrichment: Key Issues in Comparative Part 5 doc

... describesthe unwinding of a mutual contract in its totality: A asks for restitutio in integrum and in order to be successful has to offer restitutio in integrum.Restitutio in integrum means that ... 161, 52 , 57 ; Reuter and Martinek, UngerechtfertigteBereicherung, 216; Lorenz in: Staudinger,§ 817, n. 12). A different solution was found in BGH 1990 ZIP 9 15, concerning a bank loan given in ... of almost the same vintage as Singhv. Ali, with Lord Denning once again delivering the opinion of the Board.There, a father owned 139 acres of land. In order to evade administrativeregulations...
  • 80
  • 327
  • 0
Unjustified Enrichment: Key Issues in Comparative Part 2 doc

Unjustified Enrichment: Key Issues in Comparative Part 2 doc

... Svenska International plc[19 95] 1 All ER 54 5 at 55 6 ff.; Kleinwort Benson v. Birmingham City Council [1997] QB 380;Guinness Mahon & Co. Ltd v Kensington & Chelsea Royal LBC [1999] QB 2 15 ... the parties’ mistake?And if a contract is invalid, can the parties recover what they trans-ferred? Regarding mistakes at law, the following distinction is made in 4Birks, Introduction, 153 . 5 Goff ... 351 ; Maskell v. Horner [19 15] 3 KB 106; Lord Goff in Woolwich Equitable Building Society v. IRC [1993] AC 70 at 1 65. 61See, e.g., Rogers v. Ingham [1876] 3 Ch 351 ; Sawyer & Vincent v. Window...
  • 80
  • 281
  • 0
Unjustified Enrichment: Key Issues in Comparative Part 10 doc

Unjustified Enrichment: Key Issues in Comparative Part 10 doc

... does not infringe the policy underlying the rule invalidatingthe contract.2 75 So, after all, enrichment law cannot ignore the reasons267Zweigert and K¨otz, Introduction, 55 6, 55 7. See also ... Bankton, Institutes, Book I, Title 24, 2; Bell, Principles, § 55 7; Reid v. Lord Ruthven(1918) 55 SLR 616 at 618 (admittedly an unsatisfactory case), all citing (or in Bell’scase misciting) Justinian’s ... theory’ in the condictio indebiti;349and(ii) recompense as the lineal descendant of the post-Justinianic actio de in rem verso in its original distinctive role as a remedy redressing indirectenrichment. 350 (a)...
  • 73
  • 465
  • 0
Unjustified Enrichment: Key Issues in Comparative Part 1 potx

Unjustified Enrichment: Key Issues in Comparative Part 1 potx

... 28, 106, 168, 169, 173, 227, 250 ,[1991] 2 AC 54 8 (HL) 51 4– 15, 51 7, 51 8, 51 9, 57 5, 630, 634 5, 641–3, 655 , 668–9, 703, 712, 717, 722Lloyds Bank plc v. Independent Insurance Co. Ltd [2000] QB 110;[1999] ... 187–8Macmillan Inc. v. Bishopsgate Investment Trust plc [1996] 1 WLR 387 (CA) 59 0Madrid v. Spears (1 957 ) 250 F 2d 51 (10th Cir) 3 75 376Magee v. Pennine Insurance Co. Ltd [1969] 2 QB 50 7 250 Magistrates ... 443 55 1Blackburn v. Smith (1848) 2 Ex 783 256 Blacklocks v. J. B. Developments (Godalming) Ltd [1982] Ch 183 51 5Blum v. Dawkins Inc. 683 So 2d 163 (Florida Districts CA,5th District 1996) 55 2Boardman...
  • 80
  • 376
  • 0
Unjustified Enrichment: Key Issues in Comparative Part 3 pot

Unjustified Enrichment: Key Issues in Comparative Part 3 pot

... different meanings depending onwhether it is used in a contractual or restitutionary sense. Viscount Simon in Fibrosa distinguished these meanings in the following manner:13 in the law relating to ... the guiltyparty creates the right in the innocent party to rescind instead of a right in the guilty party to recover, which seems to be a preferable way to viewthe problem. If, following rescission, ... result in the area in question throughout Britain.It is certain that in reaching its decisions in Cantiere and Fibrosa theHouse of Lords saw no distinction between failure of cause in the condictioand...
  • 80
  • 252
  • 0
Unjustified Enrichment: Key Issues in Comparative Part 4 pot

Unjustified Enrichment: Key Issues in Comparative Part 4 pot

... 89 95; Graham v. WesternBank of Scotland (1 854 ) 2 M 55 9 at 56 4 per Lord Ordinary Kinloch; Tennent v. City ofGlasgow Bank (1879) 6 R 55 4 at 55 7 for the defender; Maitland v. Gight (16 75) Mor 9 158 ;Bonnington ... original scope, using it to resolve the problemsit was originally meant to resolve.II. The original scope of the doctrineThese problems become clear if the origin of the doctrine is examined. ... gave the plain-tiff from the value of whatever the plaintiff had given him. For example, in one case in which the doctrine was first applied, the incompetent party,who was supervising the construction...
  • 80
  • 340
  • 0
Unjustified Enrichment: Key Issues in Comparative Part 6 pptx

Unjustified Enrichment: Key Issues in Comparative Part 6 pptx

... innocent landowner, the aggrieved party isconstrained to engage in a transaction he has not freely chosen, for thepurpose of minimising the aggregate loss resulting from the other party’sinfringement. In ... respecting the CIA’s confidential information.Since the agent’s duty of loyalty is aimed, first and foremost, at preservingand vindicating the CIA’s control over the dissemination of such informa-tion, ... the buildings. The samereservation was expressed by Lord President Inglis in Duke of Hamilton v. Johnston(1877) 14 SLR 298. 55 See note 30, above. 56 (1876) 3 R 816. 57 Ibid. at 8 25 6. The...
  • 80
  • 266
  • 0
Unjustified Enrichment: Key Issues in Comparative Part 7 pptx

Unjustified Enrichment: Key Issues in Comparative Part 7 pptx

... consent: instead, the primary distinction is bet-ween performance by a third party with or without an interest in doing so.(a) Performance by interested third partiesWhere the third party whose ... not have a clear interest that payment should notbe made. 54 In certain circumstances a third party can recover even where thedischarge was against the debtor’s wishes 55 In Scots law, negotiorum ... argue in thesame place that this is also the position in French law. 50 Art. 1236, code civil;§ 268 BGB; Friedmann and Cohen, ‘Payment of Another’s Debt’, §§ 3, 45, 46. 51 Principles,§ 55 7. 52 Whitty,...
  • 80
  • 225
  • 0
Unjustified Enrichment: Key Issues in Comparative Part 8 pps

Unjustified Enrichment: Key Issues in Comparative Part 8 pps

... enrichment in english law 52 5means not insisting on a minus to the plaintiff and, broader still, accept-ing the possibility of interceptive subtraction freed from that restrictiverequirement. Interceptive ... appliances’), 57 in which the owner of land (D) 55 1996 (4) SA 19 (A) at 28G–H and 29D–H. I have changed the letters used in thejudgment to maintain consistency in this contribution for ease of reading. 56 In ... in 88Above, 51 8.89Above, n. 85. 90The invocation of tracing in Baroness Wenlock v. River Dee Co. (1887) 19 QBD 155 shouldbe explained in the same way.91Above, 50 2.P1: FCH/FYX P2: FCH/FYX...
  • 80
  • 352
  • 0
Unjustified Enrichment: Key Issues in Comparative Part 9 pdf

Unjustified Enrichment: Key Issues in Comparative Part 9 pdf

... impoverishment were unjustified. 57 53 Req. 15 June 1892, S 1893.1.281 note Labb´e, DP 1892.1 .59 6. 54 At 616. 55 Challies, Doctrine of Unjustified Enrichment, 30. 56 Contrast art. 1494, which establishes ... Fortier Inc. v. Caisse Populaire Desjardins de la Plaine [1998] RJQ 1221at 1227, citing French doctrine.110[1999] 2 AC 349; [1998] 4 All ER 51 3.111The argument was built on points made in P. ... superseded,however, in the case in which it mattered most: when the third partywas insolvent. This was the situation in the root case of the whole bodyof jurisprudence.107It was sometimes explained doctrinally...
  • 80
  • 171
  • 0

Xem thêm

Từ khóa: key issues in i seakey issues in the development ofagriculture in africakey issues in designing epidemiologic and clinical studies in orthodonticsimportant but often overlooked key issues in diabeteskey issues in the testing of dyes and colourskey issues in testing damaged textile samplescurrent developments and key issues in islamic financegiáo trình độc chất học part 5 docxthiết kế bài giảng lịch sử 8 tập 1 part 5 docxthiết kế bài giảng vật lý 11 tập 1 part 5 docship or sheep third edition part 5 doctự học indesign cs2 layout part 5 docxbài tập vật liệu xây dựng part 5 docxa study in scarlet part 2 chapter 5 summaryin sickness and in health a trip to the genetic counselor part 5Nghiên cứu sự biến đổi một số cytokin ở bệnh nhân xơ cứng bì hệ thốngNghiên cứu tổ hợp chất chỉ điểm sinh học vWF, VCAM 1, MCP 1, d dimer trong chẩn đoán và tiên lượng nhồi máu não cấpBiện pháp quản lý hoạt động dạy hát xoan trong trường trung học cơ sở huyện lâm thao, phú thọGiáo án Sinh học 11 bài 13: Thực hành phát hiện diệp lục và carôtenôitGiáo án Sinh học 11 bài 13: Thực hành phát hiện diệp lục và carôtenôitNGHIÊN CỨU CÔNG NGHỆ KẾT NỐI VÔ TUYẾN CỰ LY XA, CÔNG SUẤT THẤP LPWAN SLIDEQuản lý hoạt động học tập của học sinh theo hướng phát triển kỹ năng học tập hợp tác tại các trường phổ thông dân tộc bán trú huyện ba chẽ, tỉnh quảng ninhPhát triển mạng lưới kinh doanh nước sạch tại công ty TNHH một thành viên kinh doanh nước sạch quảng ninhTrả hồ sơ điều tra bổ sung đối với các tội xâm phạm sở hữu có tính chất chiếm đoạt theo pháp luật Tố tụng hình sự Việt Nam từ thực tiễn thành phố Hồ Chí Minh (Luận văn thạc sĩ)Nghiên cứu tổng hợp các oxit hỗn hợp kích thƣớc nanomet ce 0 75 zr0 25o2 , ce 0 5 zr0 5o2 và khảo sát hoạt tính quang xúc tác của chúngTìm hiểu công cụ đánh giá hệ thống đảm bảo an toàn hệ thống thông tinThiết kế và chế tạo mô hình biến tần (inverter) cho máy điều hòa không khíBT Tieng anh 6 UNIT 2Tăng trưởng tín dụng hộ sản xuất nông nghiệp tại Ngân hàng Nông nghiệp và Phát triển nông thôn Việt Nam chi nhánh tỉnh Bắc Giang (Luận văn thạc sĩ)Giáo án Sinh học 11 bài 15: Tiêu hóa ở động vậtGiáo án Sinh học 11 bài 15: Tiêu hóa ở động vậtchuong 1 tong quan quan tri rui roGiáo án Sinh học 11 bài 14: Thực hành phát hiện hô hấp ở thực vậtGiáo án Sinh học 11 bài 14: Thực hành phát hiện hô hấp ở thực vậtMÔN TRUYỀN THÔNG MARKETING TÍCH HỢP